My post was sort of an almagamation addressing all the points brought up as I was following the recent post within this thread, and I do understand the underpinnings that hold your conclusion together. That is, they could not have eaten of the tof or they could've never died. But this leaves me the question , 'why did had they refrained from eating of it, since there was only a restriction from the tree of tkogae?'
I meant to address this within the post I started which ended with the verse, "they were naked and they were not ashamed."
I tend to think of multiple planes, as exampled by my quirky writings, and this offers me the perspective that their nakedness was not only speaking of their physical condition but also their vulnerability, their exposure to 'outside' influences, forces other than the sun, wind, and rain. But, relative to that idea, and considering the definition of ashamed, that they were not ashamed implies they were not "embarrassed or guilty because of one's actions, characteristics, or associations," and there is an additional entry within the definition, "(ashamed to do something) reluctant to do something through fear of embarrassment or humiliation." (Data from Oxford languages)