I think you just contradicted yourself. ?Yes, but voting none of the above lends credibility to the election because they will say how many people voted. You would be better off not voting at all.
I think you just contradicted yourself. ?Yes, but voting none of the above lends credibility to the election because they will say how many people voted. You would be better off not voting at all.
If they are going to steal the election, then it doesn't matter how one votes.The problem with not voting is it makes it easier for them to steal the election.
That's interesting. Which candidate meets with your criteria and why?If they are going to steal the election, then it doesn't matter how one votes.
I do vote, for third party, not expecting them to win, but to register a vote that went to neither of the mainstream candidates.
Sadly, our entire electoral system is but a huge joke these days.All the good jokes have already been taken, like saying Trump turned into rambo, overpowered the Secret service and from the backseat of the presidential limo took control of the limo and turned it around.
Or how about the absurd -- suing Trump for $450 million because he borrowed money from a bank and paid it back with interest!
Or the raunchy, coming up with names like Fanny and Nathan's hot dog to have the key stone cops admit to election fraud, perjury, etc.
Unfortunately none of them do.That's interesting. Which candidate meets with your criteria and why?
This is interesting as well. Seems your voting for a bad candidate is noble while others doing the same thing is ignoble.Unfortunately none of them do.
My vote is to make a statement, not promote a choice. Because there is no good choice.
Nor, according to scripture, should we expect one.
Then you're missing my pointThis is interesting as well. Seems your voting for a bad candidate is noble while others doing the same thing is ignoble.
Oh, I think I get it.Then you're missing my point
Unfortunately none of them do.
My vote is to make a statement, not promote a choice. Because there is no good choice.
Nor, according to scripture, should we expect one.
The problem with not voting is it makes it easier for them to steal the election.
Voting "none of the above" sends a message, but the downside is they will not report what you voted, only the percentage of people voting and so all you accomplish is you lend credibility to the person elected. Notice, they report % of the vote. Suppose 36% votes one candidate, and 35% votes another, and 29% vote none of the above. They may simply ignore 29% vote and report that 50.7% of the vote went for one candidate and 49.3% for the other, and then say that turn out was strong, again ignoring a third of the voters or that the number of those who voted for the winning candidate was close to 16% of all registered voters.I think you just contradicted yourself. ?
Combine this comment with what you said in Post 84 and to me it undermines or all but negates your comment about Christians voting for Trump. If none of the candidates are an ideal choice for a Christian then it is unreasonable to condemn Christians for voting for one or the other on that criteria.Unfortunately none of them do.
My vote is to make a statement, not promote a choice. Because there is no good choice.
Nor, according to scripture, should we expect one.
The way the last election was stolen is after the polls close they can see who didn't vote and how many votes they need and then make phony ballots to change the outcome.No, if they are going to steal the election it matters not how many people vote.
Stealing an election only works if people believe it.
It is the Lord's judgement on this country for rebelling against Him and the word of God.
One side threatens communism (rme). The other side threatens peoples faith.Well here's the problem. One IS actually worse than the other. And we have a chance to stop communism in this country we ought to do everything we can to do so. When peoples freedoms are being taken away, we need to stand against tyranny as was done years ago against Britain. This is a very serious time in American history, there is a difference between the two. It's a stark one and I can't see how some are missing it. I hope people sincerely seek the Lords will this time around. I hope people will be smart enough to vote against the radical left.
You mean red hat, right?The so called "white hat Christian patriots" are not going to stop this come coming forth.
You have a point there, but not voting at all is considered apathy, not protest. And they're going to divide the vote between the two major parties like you pointed out anyway, so whether you vote third party or not at all the numbers will be the same.Voting "none of the above" sends a message, but the downside is they will not report what you voted, only the percentage of people voting and so all you accomplish is you lend credibility to the person elected. Notice, they report % of the vote. Suppose 36% votes one candidate, and 35% votes another, and 29% vote none of the above. They may simply ignore 29% vote and report that 50.7% of the vote went for one candidate and 49.3% for the other, and then say that turn out was strong, again ignoring a third of the voters or that the number of those who voted for the winning candidate was close to 16% of all registered voters.
However if those 29% of those who vote "none of the above" simply stayed home the message would still be "none of the above" but this time it would be much harder to ignore the low turnout or the very low number of people who voted for the winner.
You mean red hat, right?
Well, yes, voting is pretty moot at this point, even a protest vote. What's prophesied to happen will happen no matter how one votes, even a vote in protest.Combine this comment with what you said in Post 84 and to me it undermines or all but negates your comment about Christians voting for Trump. If none of the candidates are an ideal choice for a Christian then it is unreasonable to condemn Christians for voting for one or the other on that criteria.
My attitude is that only Jesus brings salvation, that is not the job of an elected official. You vote for those who you think will best restrain evil. They are not saviors, at best they can be an instrument of righteousness.
I also believe all things are under the Lord's sovereignty and that includes Joe Biden's presidency. I feel the election was stolen, but like Mike Lindell it was done in such a blatant, brazen way that everyone must see it and those who refuse to admit it are willfully holding down the truth. It is the Lord's judgement on this country for rebelling against Him and the word of God.