What is your point?
My point was to see if you could get the gist of what I was saying, but you went directly to where Satan is at lol
But don't worry, some of the supposedly more educated here did the same hahahahahaha
What is your point?
You just further confirmed what I already suspected.The ad hominem is your only defense, isn’t it? You refuse to answer the question as asked and instead attack my character.
My intention is to show as many as love the truth the scriptural and logical flaws in the false doctrine. The fruit in your responses is also indicative. The lack of common curtesy is common, although the whole of US culture employs this.
Are you Hebrew Roots?
Yes, my family heritage belongs to Sephardim![]()
My point was to see if you could get the gist of what I was saying, but you went directly to where Satan is at lol
But don't worry, some of the supposedly more educated here did the same hahahahahaha
God will not be mocked
You know full well the intent of his/her questions. It’s to point out your hypocrisy.
The context of willful sin in Hebrews 10:26 is practicing sin.
Waiting is not Doing something but doing NOTHING. Second, the father says the son was to him DEAD. So he wasn’t waiting for him to return but assumed he NEVER WOULD. You are in error.
Exactly, that is my point. Sin is not defined by whether the intention was or wasn't a mistake. You proposed that it is not a SIN if the action was a mistake. I merely pointed out that this is not supported by the definition of sin.Hmmm, I don’t see anything in the definitions saying SIN does include mistakes.
Nonetheless anyone who doesn't agree with you (Reformed, OSAS deniers, others) is insulted, lied about, slandered and attacked by you and those you follow, a fact many have been victims of and can attest to.
Woe is me. The continued assault on the Power of God to give eternal life for those who accept it. The deniers pursue Salvation as a condition with terms. God did not offer it that way. Living the life of a child of Jesus is a different matter.
So many false doctrines it is difficult for me to keep up.
You’re a sinner regardless of what semantic excuses you claim to make.God’s words will not be mocked.
You rather believe there’s something wrong with scripture that claims you can stop sinning willfully instead of standing convicted by the word that you are in disobedience to the word.
I didn’t read past this. What benefit of the doubt do you think you were giving him?That was my assumption. But I gave him the benefit of the doubt.
“If you deny Him, he will deny you”.... only one of many NT conditional promises. If you forgive others, then God will forgive you...another one.God's promises are not conditional upon anything if one is a Christian. If you live under the Old Covenant that's one thing but if you are born again God's grace to you is not conditional.
Mistakes are unintentional; sins are of the heart. I like hot dogs. If you cooked me a hot dog and it was lousy, would insulting your cooking, even delicately, be a sin or would lying to spare your feelings be a sin? Or is the correct answer, neither/both?Re: What is sin ... dictionary: an immoral act considered to be a transgression against divine law.
What is immoral per dictionary: not conforming to accepted standards of morality.
Exactly, that is my point. Sin is not defined by whether the intention was or wasn't a mistake. You proposed that it is not a SIN if the action was a mistake. I merely pointed out that this is not supported by the definition of sin.
Illustration: I can say I cannot SIN if I hold a hotdog in my hand. I have arbitrarily changed the definition of SIN. I merely pointed out that you did the same thing when you arbitrarily said an event is not a SIN if it is a MISTAKE (like I said it is not a sin when holding a hotdog).
Wrong. Doing NOTHING uses a verb too and means no action. “Waiting” is an inactive verb.Wrong, waiting is verb, it is an action.
He never took any action to get his son back........delay action until a particular time or until something else happens.
As long as the son did ALL. the work of coming....on his own....with no help whatsoever from the father.While the father had thought him dead and lost... he still welcomed him back ... a perfect picture of God's unfailing love and grace.
You’re a sinner regardless of what semantic excuses you claim to make.
As did you. OSAS believers are unable to defend their peculiar theology but attack personally anyone who dares offer the obvious questions. I didn’t question your character but instead your theology. You cannot say the same. It is the major defense you have.You just further confirmed what I already suspected.![]()