Thanks for the Scriptural Evidence...sorry I asked...Your words are NOT Truth
Thanks for the Scriptural Evidence...sorry I asked...Your words are NOT Truth
Apostle’s and Prophets have direct revelations from God. How would you know if one is truly called? Bill Johnson essentially call himself one and so does Kenneth Copeland.Ask Him.
If prophetic gifts flow through us, we are are used to be prophetic.
If apostolic gifts flow through us we are being used to be apostolic.
I suppose, either way they start with compete humility and surrender.
bless you
He tells you. You are in relationship.[/QUOTE
So anyone who claims to have heard from God directly is a Prophet?
YouTube is a full of those people. It’s almost mockery in my opinion. Many of them might not even be aware of their actions.I believe that while prophets can be used to give a prophecy they are mainly used to inspire encourage and build his church, they are the ones who always point other to Christ who deepen their walk in him who bring them closer to his heart. They are voice of God when you hear that song come on just at the right time they are the people whose wrtings can still a raging soul into a calm sea they are the one that are given inspiration to post a scripture and not have any idea why they were lead to do so
Of course the role of a prophet goes deeper than that they are often times inspired to say something and at the time they say it it feels solid and true but then later they wonder why they said it only to find out it either happened or it deeply impacted a person. I have found that many prophets have a keen sense of his voice they can hear his voice in anything and everything and he speaks to them through most everything even something that seemingly has nothing to do with him.
They also seem to be sensitive people as well easily emotional and able to bear the burden of another persons trials they carry it with them. I think that people with such hearts make the best kind of prophet because they are easily influenced by God easily inspired easily tuned into his voice but this also means they are easily affected by the enemy as well.
I have seen many so called prophets on youtube it doesn't take much these days to convince a lot of people your a prophet and the views you get on your channel are a whole lot but there are many false prophets and if they were wise they would understand that they more so than anyone will be held accountable for what they claim to speak in his name and the price is very heavy.
Many may not know the name Wayne Grudem or his book The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today; or maybe you do. Apparently it's a popular book in charismatic circles.
View attachment 233260
Grudem's main argument is that New Testament prophets differ from Old Testament prophets in the sense that New Testament prophets aren't always right.He says God gives true prophecies to the prophet, but since the prophet is a fallible human the message may get lost in transmission. He even gives an example of why Agabus was wrong when he prophesied Paul would be bound and handed over to the Romans in Acts 21. It's a ridiculous idea that can easily be disproven.
But the story doesn't end there. Recently a Prophetic Standards Statement was issued and signed by a group that's made up nearly entirely of people from the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). I'll post a few of the more ridiculous notions and comment on them; but you really have to read the whole thing for yourself to get a sense of how ominous it really is.
"WE RECOGNIZE that prophets do not serve as spiritual fortune tellers or prognosticators, nor is their role to satisfy our curiosity about the future or reveal abstract information." This statement is directly contradicted by other statements that come later. For example: "WE UNDERSTAND that prophecies can be conditional and that many prophecies will take time to come to pass"; and "On the other hand, if a prophetic word is delivered containing specific details and dates in which the stated prophetic word will come to pass and that prophecy contains no conditions to be met in order to be fulfilled, and that word does not come to pass as prophesied, then the one who delivered the word must be willing to take full responsibility, demonstrating genuine contrition before God and people." Sure sounds like prognosticating to me. It continues: "Any statement of apology and/or explanation/clarification should be delivered to the audience to whom the erroneous word was given. For example, if it was given to an individual, the apology (and/or explanation/clarification) should be delivered to the individual. If the word was delivered publicly, then a public apology (and/or explanation/clarification) should be presented." Notice what it says: the prophet doesn't have to be right, only willing to show genuine contrition. This idea comes directly from Grudem's book.
And there's more, unfortunately:
"Finally, while we believe in holding prophets accountable for their words, in accordance with the Scriptures, we do not believe that a sincere prophet who delivers an inaccurate message is therefore a false prophet." Prophecy falsely? No worries, as long as you're sincere.
"WE REJECT the notion that a contemporary prophetic word is on the same level of inspiration or authority as Scripture or that God always speaks inerrantly through prophets today, since the Bible says we only know in part and prophesy in part (1 Cor. 13:9). It is the written Word alone that can lay claim to being "the Word of God" (2 Tim. 3:16); prophecies, at best, are "a word from the Lord," to be tested by the Word of God." But again this is directly contradicted by their very first statement: "WE BELIEVE that the gifts of the Holy Spirit, including the gift of prophecy and the ministry of the prophet, are essential for the edification of the Body of Christ and the work of the ministry, which is why Scripture exhorts us to earnestly desire spiritual gifts, especially that we may prophesy." So apparently God's word isn't sufficient after all, since prophecy is also "essential." If everything must be tested against God word, what need do we have for prophecy?
"WE RECOGNIZE the unique challenges posed by the internet and social media, as anyone claiming to be a prophet can release a word to the general public without any accountability or even responsibility. While it is not possible to stop the flood of such words online, we urge all believers to check the lives and fruit of those they follow online and also see if they are part of a local church body and have true accountability for their public ministries and personal lives. We also urge prophetic ministers posting unfiltered and untested words purportedly from the Lord to first submit those words to peer leaders for evaluation." The internet poses a serious threat to these false prophets, and so we see their contempt for it.
Throughout the Statement, there's talk of prophets needing to fall under the authority of peer groups and other ministers to have their "prophecies" evaluated.
What this Statement amounts to simply is a power grab by the NAR to tighten its grip on the prophetic community, bringing it under their control; and to recruit new supporters.
A lot of people signed this. Many names are unfamiliar but they have ties to the NAR. You may recognize some of them. Notice Wayne Grudem among them.
My problem is that they are the blind leading the blind except if you tell an actual blind person they will be like duh but if you tell these people you are attacked by a swarm of followers.YouTube is a full of those people. It’s almost mockery in my opinion. Many of them might not even be aware of their actions.
Having known a true prophet for 30 years or so, I think I can answer your question.I'm just curious. If a prophet must be grounded in the word, and not prophecy anything that contradicts God's word, why do we need prophets? Teachers, yeah. But it seems prophecy is irrelevant if it must always conform to God's word. Why not just study God's word? Am I making sense?
Okay, but I don't see how you really addressed the actual question, though you did a nice job of dancing around it.
The question is: If modern-day prophecy must line up with scripture, what need is there for prophets?
How would one know if they are truly called to be an Apostle or Prophet?
What would be the measure to use to see if they are genuine?
He also had a gift of insight into the personal condition of people around him. He could read them like a book. That drew a lot of people who were fascinated by this gift. However, when it got too close to seriously wrong attitudes, they often left rather than deal with the problem. In our small fellowship, there was no place to hide. So some people pulled out, including one who was committing adultery. He was the least likely looking womaniser imaginable. But God knew. My friend confronted this man and that was the last we saw of him.
The prophet is usually very much alone. He may be a "people person" as my friend was, but telling people the truth does not endear the prophet to the hearer. His first pastor recognised this gift. He said that my friend would be one of the most despised people in Christendom. And that turned out to be true.
Then people don't know what a prophet is. Firstly if they call you that for stating the facts then perhaps they meant false teacher secondly remember Jesus was also called horrible things for speaking the truthBecause I described the facts, I may also be described as a false prophet by others.
I am sorry you had to go through this, his post is eerly similar to me I am a people person but often times am alone and have lost many people who I considered close friends because they thought I was calling myself a prophet when I told them some of the things I have seen and heard. Now I don't like to call myself a prophet as I don't consider myself worthy to be one but I do walk in the prophetic and that can be a very hard and lonely roadStarting to grow concerned about this myself, quite frankly. There is also the problem of the enemy going after people who walk with you, and if those walking with you are not strong enough to endure what will come (most are not) the enemy turns them against you, or at the very least causes them to distance themselves from you, which can be painful.
Thanks for sharing. It's encouraging to know I am not the only one.
I am sorry you had to go through this, his post is eerly similar to me I am a people person but often times am alone and have lost many people who I considered close friends because they thought I was calling myself a prophet when I told them some of the things I have seen and heard. Now I don't like to call myself a prophet as I don't consider myself worthy to be one but I do walk in the prophetic and that can be a very hard and lonely road
plus in my opinion if you really are a prophet you won't need to say you are people will just recognize it in you
Grudem's main argument is that New Testament prophets differ from Old Testament prophets in the sense that New Testament prophets aren't always right.He says God gives true prophecies to the prophet, but since the prophet is a fallible human the message may get lost in transmission. He even gives an example of why Agabus was wrong when he prophesied Paul would be bound and handed over to the Romans in Acts 21. It's a ridiculous idea that can easily be disproven.