Next time she tells you to go get it elsewhere, tell her, "Phew, I was kind of worried you'd be upset that I did. She's a real hottie," and then ask her if she made your sammich.
You need to address this issue before anything else.I had mentioned how I'm a workaholic at work 80 hours a week. I'm unsupported by my wife and my endeavors.
good points, though on number two, that's a terrible oversimplification, our swing shift is on 4 10 hour days a week, and longer hour days are sometimes a given in certain occupations.You need to address this issue before anything else.
1. God says you should work for only six days in the week.
2. Common sense and general observation will tell you that you should work only eight hours per day. That is the standard work day for most people.
3. Let's say we round out 6 x 8 = 48 to 50. Which means you are spending 60% more time at work than you should.
4. So if you took those extra 30 hours and divided them by 6, you would be spending 5 hours per day with you wife. Do you think you would then get her support since you are giving her time and attention?
Sorry for the long post.I wish it were that simple.
I am trying to decide how much is appropriate to share.
As a child my wife's parents highly abused her in every way imaginable. Stuff that makes your brain freeze in disbelief. We have always dealt with the demons from her past, DID, demonic oppression. Heck her mother at one point was on a rampage about how our first born must be dedicated to Satan before she turned 2. Fortunately the Lord provided a way. They had money and influence. Looking back He orchestrated events perfectly for us to go to another country and for my wife to realize without my forcing or even suggesting that she needed to cut ties with her family. Which she did of her own. Obviously the Lord was involved.
Even when I wasn't working such long hours. In fact mostly managing her...personality and issues and taking care of the kids. She would rarely participate in physical contact. And was harsh, making accusations of infidelity and everything else. Telling me I needed to get my physical needs fulfilled elsewhere. Every business venture or job I had was sabotaged, honestly I allowed it to be by always putting her needs first for almost 15 years.
One day I was reflecting on all this and realized that I didn't feel like a man. I looked at myself in the mirror and saw a simp. And decided no more. I was performing the definition of insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. I had to change and quit worrying so much about what my wife thinks. Placing her in effect as an idol. So I started this business while working for someone else.
At one point about 4 and 1/2 years ago she was going to a church group in another town and she came back with the idea that because I desire to have an intimate relationship with her there is sexual deviancy involved and she needed to cut off all physical intimacy in order to "fix me". I think that's the way she put it. I got the impression all the women in this group had made some kind of pact to do this. I have tried broaching the subject many a time and lips are sealed.
So forget the intimacy, I'm 50 this year and it's been so long now I'm kinda over it.
I can't continue talking about this at the moment, my finger needs a break from the phone.
I'm posting this thread in order to not completely hijack another thread.
I had mentioned how I'm a workaholic at work 80 hours a week. I'm unsupported by my wife and my endeavors. She does not work. Yada yada yada. I thought perhaps a good discussion could ensue and perhaps we could encourage each other concerning marriage and Helen general. It's just tough. It's hard enough with two people from two different backgrounds becoming one. Much less dealing with all the baggage that each has had from their past. And we all have baggage.
I'm driving on my way to a job so please forgive the bad grammar, misspelling etc because I'm letting Google do the typing while I have paid attention to the road .
That is not sound Biblical advice.I understand, you work so hard and for no real appreciation. God alone knows your heart and motives, so put your feelings at His feet and ask Him to show you what to do.
On a practical level, could you reduce your hours and spend more time with your wife and family?
If this doesn't work, then propose to your wife that you separate and she finds a life that satisfies her better. Perhaps she could work.
Many pastors say stuff like "if husbands would be 'leaders', wives would just automatically fall into their roles and everything would be fine". No it won't: wives are individuals with minds of their own. Too many pastors are afraid to teach what the Bible says: that the man is the "head" and wives are to "submit". They are afraid of the pushback from the women in their churches and afraid of being called "sexist" or "bigots".
That is not sound Biblical advice.
Stay faithful, sir. I Corinthians 7: 10-13
Agreed: everyone's behavior, specifically bad behavior, is a result of the fall. But in a Christian family, there should be no dynamic of "punishment" and no need for "ruling". Husbands are to love their wives, and wives are to love their husbands. Whether "ruling", loving or submitting, it should all be done voluntarily and intentionally; not by force. A wife is never going to force her husband to love her by complaining or by withholding affection and the husband is never going to force the wife to submit by being overbearing and mean. Needs are to be met by showing love to the other person.Remember God punished women in two ways as a result of the Fall:
"I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
The second punishment, to put it bluntly, is submitting to the husband. No matter how wonderful the husband is, women want to have their own way when there is disagreement. In the New Testament, Paul explains that everyone has to submit to someone. However, I believe the "feeling" of punishment still lingers over from the Fall for women with respect to their relationships with their husbands. I think it would be helpful for husbands to realize that their wives' behavior, just like pain in childbearing, may actually be a result from the Fall.
God did give permission for divorce, in the Old Testament "because of the hardness of people's hearts". But the only 'grounds" I've ever seen mentioned by Christ is for "fornication". You know, doing stuff like molesting the kids, committing sex crimes, homosexual stuff etc etc.If she is refusing him he already has grounds for divorce. The Bible speaks on that and I believe that would be considered a Biblical reason for divorce.
Genesis 3:16 already says husband ruling over wife is intended as punishment for the woman. I think it is more wise to understand wives from this perspective and go from there, instead of saying there is no punishment at all. I think this helps men understand women more. God's design for marriage is that husband is head of family, but that doesn't mean He got rid of the punishment from the Fall just like with childbearing pain. A wive can still love and submit despite feeling this punishment, but Genesis 3:16 suggests it will be an internal battle at least because her desire is to do what she wants instead.Agreed: everyone's behavior, specifically bad behavior, is a result of the fall. But in a Christian family, there should be no dynamic of "punishment" and no need for "ruling". Husbands are to love their wives, and wives are to love their husbands. Whether "ruling", loving or submitting, it should all be done voluntarily and intentionally; not by force. A wife is never going to force her husband to love her by complaining or by withholding affection and the husband is never going to force the wife to submit by being overbearing and mean. Needs are to be met by showing love to the other person.
I strongly disagree. Punishment was not a factor in the "Proverbs 31" family. In this model family, the wife was an entrepreneur and had full freedom to do things like making and selling goods, buying real estate: She even had servants. Her husband and children praised her. That is a family that sustains, prospers and builds each other up through love for one another instead of tearing one another down with conflict and strife.. Notice again, that this woman has no "boss" to order her around on the job: she is an entrepreneur and happily submits to her husband only. By contrast to many men, the "proverbs 31" man is a well known man in his community, and he doesn't have to beg for intimacy with his wife. He trusts her fully to "have his back" and to meet all his needs as he meets hers. Read it bro. I see no "punishment" in any of that.Genesis 3:16 already says husband ruling over wife is intended as punishment for the woman. I think it is more wise to understand wives from this perspective and go from there, instead of saying there is no punishment at all. I think this helps men understand women more. God's design for marriage is that husband is head of family, but that doesn't mean He got rid of the punishment from the Fall just like with childbearing pain. A wive can still love and submit despite feeling this punishment, but Genesis 3:16 suggests it will be an internal battle at least because her desire is to do what she wants instead.
I Cor 7:15.God did give permission for divorce, in the Old Testament "because of the hardness of people's hearts". But the only 'grounds" I've ever seen mentioned by Christ is for "fornication". You know, doing stuff like molesting the kids, committing sex crimes, homosexual stuff etc etc.
I strongly disagree. Punishment was not a factor in the "Proverbs 31" family. In this model family, the wife was an entrepreneur and had full freedom to do things like making and selling goods, buying real estate: She even had servants. Her husband and children praised her. That is a family that sustains, prospers and builds each other up through love for one another instead of tearing one another down with conflict and strife.. Notice again, that this woman has no "boss" to order her around on the job: she is an entrepreneur and happily submits to her husband only. By contrast to many men, the "proverbs 31" man is a well known man in his community, and he doesn't have to beg for intimacy with his wife. He trusts her fully to "have his back" and to meet all his needs as he meets hers. Read it bro. I see no "punishment" in any of that.
No, Proverbs 31 is a model, an example for us as to how a Christian family is supposed to be. I never said it was common nor did I say it existed. But this is the model of a family which God WANTS people to have. If He didn't he wouldn't have put it in there for us to read. It's our choice whether or not to aspire to and pursue that lifestyle. It's not God's intentions for a Christian woman to endure "punishment" through submission to her husband, simply because she's a female. That's absurd and unbiblical.Any honest woman will say she is nowhere close to being the Proverbs 31 wife. The Proverbs 31 wife is not based on a real woman. The verses also say this type of woman is as rare as rubies.
Any honest woman will say she is nowhere close to being the Proverbs 31 wife. The Proverbs 31 wife is not based on a real woman. The verses also say this type of woman is as rare as rubies.
No, Proverbs 31 is a model, an example for us as to how a Christian family is supposed to be. I never said it was common nor did I say it existed. But this is the model of a family which God WANTS people to have. If He didn't he wouldn't have put it in there for us to read. It's our choice whether or not to aspire to and pursue that lifestyle. It's not God's intentions for a Christian woman to endure "punishment" through submission to her husband, simply because she's a female. That's absurd and unbiblical.
Yes, there is "ruling", "obeying". disrespect, nagging, arguing and physical abuse and all that; a constant battle for control in marriages all over the world as we speak. But God's model in Proverbs 31, and for New Testament Christians, is for wives to do the submitting and obeying willingly out of love and obedience to Christ instead of by force or punishment.(see 1 Peter 3) Unfortunately our Feminist society hates that and wants no submission at all. In a Christian family. I think it's actually supposed to be more about order, than punishment. Hence, the husband is designated as the "head" and he is to perform his duty out of love and obedience to Christ as well.What are your thoughts/interpretation of Genesis 3:16?
God punished Adam by cursing the ground which resulted in toiling and struggling, something we would not have faced in the Garden.
Genesis 3:17:
To Adam he said, 'Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You must not eat from it,' 'Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.
Many people including I consider work a blessing and gift. Nevertheless, despite work being a blessing, there is an element of toiling especially evident to farmers or people who grow their own food, but also in other professions as well.
Or broadly speaking, despite life being a blessing, we have to deal with physical decline and death.
Along the same thought, women were cursed with the husband ruling over them. Things were much better before the Fall in that regard. Paul gives some instructions on how husbands and wives should treat and view eachother, nevertheless women have to deal with the "curse-fueled itch" to control due to the Fall.
How is a woman’s desire for her husband a curse (Genesis 3:16)? | GotQuestions.org