Who knew? I didn't.
There are about 50 places I could find where Jesus refuted incorrect beliefs, practices, doctrines, ... and from what I can see, Jesus expects true Christians to evaluate every belief based on whether or not the belief makes complete logical, reasonable rational sense IN EVERY CASE. That said, whenever those with opposing doctrines and beliefs missed a biblical situation, verse or passage that applies to the topic. Jesus also brings those up as well, (Along with a call to use logic and reason and think all the ramifications of their beliefs through and then rethink the ones that do not make sense.
Here are the passages I found. Please let me know if I missed any of the interactions of Jesus with those whose beliefs were off.
This said, the religious lost were unwilling to reconsider their beliefs based on Jesus questioning how they didn't make sense. If we also reject the testing of our beliefs based solely on logic and reason, i.e. do they make sense, are any of the ramifications of a belief ludicrous, contrary to the stated character of God, ... are we in the same exact position the religious lost were in when Jesus stated this was enough to prove their beliefs inaccurate? If we take this position, are we not saying Jesus' opposition should have rejected His points and reasoning as superfluous and laughable?
Not only these things, but if we hold to Jesus reasoning, what does it do when we think various popular doctrines and beliefs through? What does this say about our modern hermeneutical teachings? Should most of them be greatly revised in the light of Jesus standard practices for determining correct beliefs?
Think it through. What are the ramifications for pre-trib, mid-trib and post tribulation rapture? How about water baptism as a requirement for salvation? Calvinism?
What opinions do you have on the validity of reconsidering beliefs solely based on whether or not they make complete sense when all the ramifications of them are considered?
What beliefs do you "believe" fall short of truth when Jesus methodology is applied, and why do you suggest they fail the logic, reason, "Does that make any sense", test?
I'm looking forward to the discussion, and thanks for your input.
There are about 50 places I could find where Jesus refuted incorrect beliefs, practices, doctrines, ... and from what I can see, Jesus expects true Christians to evaluate every belief based on whether or not the belief makes complete logical, reasonable rational sense IN EVERY CASE. That said, whenever those with opposing doctrines and beliefs missed a biblical situation, verse or passage that applies to the topic. Jesus also brings those up as well, (Along with a call to use logic and reason and think all the ramifications of their beliefs through and then rethink the ones that do not make sense.
Here are the passages I found. Please let me know if I missed any of the interactions of Jesus with those whose beliefs were off.
Mat. 9:1-7, 10-13, 14-17, 11:15-20, 12:1-8, 10-14, 22-32, 33-37, 15:2-9, 21:23-27, 22:16-21, 41-46, Mar. 2:7-12, 16-17, 18-22, 24-28, 3:1-5, 22-30, 11:29-33, 12:14-17, 26-27, 35-37, Luk. 5:30-32, 33-35, 36-39, 6:1-5, 6-11, 39, 40, 41-42, 43-45, 46-49, 7:36-50, 44-50, 11:17-23, 38-44, 46-52, 13:14-16, 14:2-5, 8-11, 15:2-7, 8-10, 11-32, 16:13, 20:2-8, 22-25, 37-38, 41-44, Joh. 7:21-24, 8:7
This said, the religious lost were unwilling to reconsider their beliefs based on Jesus questioning how they didn't make sense. If we also reject the testing of our beliefs based solely on logic and reason, i.e. do they make sense, are any of the ramifications of a belief ludicrous, contrary to the stated character of God, ... are we in the same exact position the religious lost were in when Jesus stated this was enough to prove their beliefs inaccurate? If we take this position, are we not saying Jesus' opposition should have rejected His points and reasoning as superfluous and laughable?
Not only these things, but if we hold to Jesus reasoning, what does it do when we think various popular doctrines and beliefs through? What does this say about our modern hermeneutical teachings? Should most of them be greatly revised in the light of Jesus standard practices for determining correct beliefs?
Think it through. What are the ramifications for pre-trib, mid-trib and post tribulation rapture? How about water baptism as a requirement for salvation? Calvinism?
What opinions do you have on the validity of reconsidering beliefs solely based on whether or not they make complete sense when all the ramifications of them are considered?
What beliefs do you "believe" fall short of truth when Jesus methodology is applied, and why do you suggest they fail the logic, reason, "Does that make any sense", test?
I'm looking forward to the discussion, and thanks for your input.
One rule of hermeneutics is,
" When the plain sense makes common sense, seek no other sense lest it becomes nonsense, to quote Dr Gary Haring. "
In this regards, perhaps it supports your own reasoning.
It's a good rule to keep in mind as some preachers continually seek the unusual interpretations or hidden meanings in order to sound profound and impress their audience with intellect or special insights. There's nothing wrong with seeking insights, however
reading into the text what is not plainly there can be a trap to the arrogant communicator of God's Word.
Pride puffs up and this was rebuked by the Lord about the rabbis and their commandments that superceded God's law. The worse thing they did with the law was to misapply it as a requirement for salvation.
Most do likewise today and add to faith in Christ an obedience to the law by "turning from sins." This is a works based method that was rebuked sternly or put in a context of a command that the one who claimed to keep, certainly did not...is the rich young ruler.
-
1
- Show all