logic and Reason Alone Can Prove Beliefs Inaccurate

[HealthAndHappiness]

Who knew? I didn't.

There are about 50 places I could find where Jesus refuted incorrect beliefs, practices, doctrines, ... and from what I can see, Jesus expects true Christians to evaluate every belief based on whether or not the belief makes complete logical, reasonable rational sense IN EVERY CASE. That said, whenever those with opposing doctrines and beliefs missed a biblical situation, verse or passage that applies to the topic. Jesus also brings those up as well, (Along with a call to use logic and reason and think all the ramifications of their beliefs through and then rethink the ones that do not make sense.

Here are the passages I found. Please let me know if I missed any of the interactions of Jesus with those whose beliefs were off.

Mat. 9:1-7, 10-13, 14-17, 11:15-20, 12:1-8, 10-14, 22-32, 33-37, 15:2-9, 21:23-27, 22:16-21, 41-46, Mar. 2:7-12, 16-17, 18-22, 24-28, 3:1-5, 22-30, 11:29-33, 12:14-17, 26-27, 35-37, Luk. 5:30-32, 33-35, 36-39, 6:1-5, 6-11, 39, 40, 41-42, 43-45, 46-49, 7:36-50, 44-50, 11:17-23, 38-44, 46-52, 13:14-16, 14:2-5, 8-11, 15:2-7, 8-10, 11-32, 16:13, 20:2-8, 22-25, 37-38, 41-44, Joh. 7:21-24, 8:7​

This said, the religious lost were unwilling to reconsider their beliefs based on Jesus questioning how they didn't make sense. If we also reject the testing of our beliefs based solely on logic and reason, i.e. do they make sense, are any of the ramifications of a belief ludicrous, contrary to the stated character of God, ... are we in the same exact position the religious lost were in when Jesus stated this was enough to prove their beliefs inaccurate? If we take this position, are we not saying Jesus' opposition should have rejected His points and reasoning as superfluous and laughable?

Not only these things, but if we hold to Jesus reasoning, what does it do when we think various popular doctrines and beliefs through? What does this say about our modern hermeneutical teachings? Should most of them be greatly revised in the light of Jesus standard practices for determining correct beliefs?

Think it through. What are the ramifications for pre-trib, mid-trib and post tribulation rapture? How about water baptism as a requirement for salvation? Calvinism?

What opinions do you have on the validity of reconsidering beliefs solely based on whether or not they make complete sense when all the ramifications of them are considered?

What beliefs do you "believe" fall short of truth when Jesus methodology is applied, and why do you suggest they fail the logic, reason, "Does that make any sense", test?

I'm looking forward to the discussion, and thanks for your input.

One rule of hermeneutics is,
" When the plain sense makes common sense, seek no other sense lest it becomes nonsense, to quote Dr Gary Haring. "

In this regards, perhaps it supports your own reasoning.
It's a good rule to keep in mind as some preachers continually seek the unusual interpretations or hidden meanings in order to sound profound and impress their audience with intellect or special insights. There's nothing wrong with seeking insights, however
reading into the text what is not plainly there can be a trap to the arrogant communicator of God's Word.

Pride puffs up and this was rebuked by the Lord about the rabbis and their commandments that superceded God's law. The worse thing they did with the law was to misapply it as a requirement for salvation.
Most do likewise today and add to faith in Christ an obedience to the law by "turning from sins." This is a works based method that was rebuked sternly or put in a context of a command that the one who claimed to keep, certainly did not...is the rich young ruler.

 

[Gideon300]

The lack of fruit was not the fault of Jesus and Paul (Matt. 13:14-15, Acts 28:26-27).
Right reasoning is godly wisdom, not IQ (1Cor. 1:10 & 25, 2:6, 11 & 16).
In Scripture "heart" means mind/will/motive/desire (1Cor. 4:5, 14:25, Mark 7:21, Rom. 1:24).
The HS convicts of sin via the mind/conscience (Rom. 2:15, 3:20, Tit. 1:15, 1Tim. 4:1-2).
Blind eyes refers to foolish thinking (Matt. 23:17).

Fine. You rely on your intellect and I will seek revelation from God by the Holy Spirit. I've tried it both ways and I know which one works. I had to fail before I woke up. Maybe you will have to fail as well. The wise man learns from his mistakes. If you are really smart, you learn from other people's mistakes.

 

[GWH]

Fine. You rely on your intellect and I will seek revelation from God by the Holy Spirit. I've tried it both ways and I know which one works. I had to fail before I woke up. Maybe you will have to fail as well. The wise man learns from his mistakes. If you are really smart, you learn from other people's mistakes.

It is NOT fine for you to claim that I rely on my intellect, when what I said was:
Right reasoning is godly wisdom, not IQ (1Cor. 1:10 & 25, 2:6, 11 & 16).

It also is not fine for you to suggest that I do not seek revelation from God via the HS, when what I said was:
The HS convicts of sin via the mind/conscience (Rom. 2:15, 3:20, Tit. 1:15, 1Tim. 4:1-2).

I agree that a wise man learns from his mistakes and those of other people.
One you just made was to deny the truth of what I shared, which was based on the Scripture cited.
Please reply again by addressing what I actually shared. Thanks.

 

[JohnRH]

logic and Reason Alone Can Prove Beliefs Inaccurate

It seems that "logic & reason alone" would be a requirement for obtaining accurate belief that unenlightened man can't fully exercise. I would have to say that God's revelation (Scripture) alone can prove beliefs accurate/inaccurate.

8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, ... saith the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are ... my thoughts [higher] than your thoughts. 10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: 11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it. Isaiah 55:8-11 (KJV)

So then faith [accurate belief] cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God [revelation]. Romans 10:17 (KJV)

For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. 20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching [revelation] to save them that believe. 1 Cor 1:19-21 (KJV)

 

[Gideon300]

It is NOT fine for you to claim that I rely on my intellect, when what I said was:
Right reasoning is godly wisdom, not IQ (1Cor. 1:10 & 25, 2:6, 11 & 16).

It also is not fine for you to suggest that I do not seek revelation from God via the HS, when what I said was:
The HS convicts of sin via the mind/conscience (Rom. 2:15, 3:20, Tit. 1:15, 1Tim. 4:1-2).

I agree that a wise man learns from his mistakes and those of other people.
One you just made was to deny the truth of what I shared, which was based on the Scripture cited.
Please reply again by addressing what I actually shared. Thanks.

It is NOT fine for you to claim that I rely on my intellect, when what I said was:
Right reasoning is godly wisdom, not IQ (1Cor. 1:10 & 25, 2:6, 11 & 16).

It also is not fine for you to suggest that I do not seek revelation from God via the HS, when what I said was:
The HS convicts of sin via the mind/conscience (Rom. 2:15, 3:20, Tit. 1:15, 1Tim. 4:1-2).

I agree that a wise man learns from his mistakes and those of other people.
One you just made was to deny the truth of what I shared, which was based on the Scripture cited.
Please reply again by addressing what I actually shared. Thanks.

You say that logic and reason alone are sufficient. You also say that you seek revelation via the Holy Spirit. If logic and reason are sufficient, why do you need revelation?

The conscience is in the spirit of man, not his mind. God's word is spiritual and can only be understood spiritually. I've already stated references that show that truth.

If the mind was adequate, there would be far less deception in the body of Christ. "Let no one deceive you with empty words" Ephesians 5:6.

"Words" here is "logois", which is where we get our word logic from. For example, how many people fall for the false prosperity gospel? String several scriptures together, ignore those that do not fit the prosperity message and voila! People flock to give their money to make someone else rich.

As I said, the mind is a good servant, but a terrible master. This is how it is supposed to work:

The spirit is where God communicates with us. God is Spirit, so that is how He relates to us. The mind should be used to take the revelation in the spirit and turn it into words that we and others can understand.

I was deceived by the prosperity message. It's most appealing, especially when you are raising four kids and times are tough. All I got was poorer. I'm glad because it's a false doctrine and I learned that, even if it was the hard way.

I had a pastor who started preaching a false concept of leadership. My spirit rang an alarm bell, but I did not know why. And that's where the mind comes in. I began to study the scriptures and so was able to confirm what I felt my spirit was saying.

Many others in that church just went along with the pastor. It ended up in catastrophe a few years later. I'd pulled the pin by then. That was nearly 50 years ago. Satan used logic and reason to deceive Eve.