What I found interesting is they said around 5 minutes in that there will not be any progress on election reform or police reform without activism.
There is a whole range of things that can be considered "activism" including get out the vote drives, campaigning, peaceful rallies, election audits, etc. Yet they are portraying that the riot that we saw in Kenosha as necessary to get "election reform" and "police reform" and people defending their business and themselves threatens these riots. It is astonishing the way the language can be twisted so that good is evil and evil is good.
Now consider the hypocrisy in arguing for the defense of the riots in Kenosha by making it illegal to defend yourself when attacked by a mob with their outrage at the Jan 6th "riot" in which there was no rioting, violence, no dumpster fires, and the only person killed was an unarmed woman who was not threatening anyone.