P
Polar
Guest
You are not listening.
The irony is literally mind blowing
six without 's' is 9
You are not listening.
When God shows you the truth - that will be "mind blowing"...The irony is literally mind blowing
This has 'occult' [influence] written all over it.six without 's' is 9
@Moses_Young : Your 'Disagree' tells me that you have not examined the evidence.Again, your model has been refuted by photographic evidence.
I understand your model, but it has been refuted. Please, demonstrate your intelligence by abandoning it.No - I wouldn't use the word 'stupid'; albeit, the word 'pride' could possibly be in-the-mix somewhere...
You are not listening.
You are not "lending yourself to learning" so that you may understand it better.
Whether or not you choose to believe that any of it is true is a different matter altogether.
He is not playing games; rather, he is trying to help you understand how it works in the Flat Earth model.
Stop trying to understand Flat Earth from a Ball Earth point of view.
The Flat Earth model is not based on the Ball Earth model. It is a totally separate model.
The Flat Earth model does not depend on the Ball Earth model. It stands on its own.
Stop trying to understand Flat Earth from a Ball Earth point of view.
To understand it properly, you must look at it from a Flat Earth point-of-view.
Neither is it [straight] in the Ball Earth model - unless you disregard the curvature under the line.
(a truly 'straight line' = "end up in outer space" - right?)
Of course, it is okay to do this on a map - in which case, we would be talking about a geographic straight line.
In the image below, the 'X' at the center would be the 'North Pole'. Every point on the circle is 'South' from/of there.
In the Flat Earth model, East-West at a particular location is in reality a tangent point of a circle.
The distance from that location to the 'North Pole' is the radius of the circle.
When God shows you the truth - that will be "mind blowing"...
This has 'occult' [influence] written all over it.
Have you been influenced by the 'occult'?
It is the influence of the 'occult' that has "turned everything around and upside down" on earth.
Believe the Bible?
Don't forget:
Revelation 12:
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
No - I wouldn't use the word 'stupid'; albeit, the word 'pride' could possibly be in-the-mix somewhere...
You are not listening.
You are not "lending yourself to learning" so that you may understand it better.
Whether or not you choose to believe that any of it is true is a different matter altogether.
He is not playing games; rather, he is trying to help you understand how it works in the Flat Earth model.
Stop trying to understand Flat Earth from a Ball Earth point of view.
The Flat Earth model is not based on the Ball Earth model. It is a totally separate model.
The Flat Earth model does not depend on the Ball Earth model. It stands on its own.
Stop trying to understand Flat Earth from a Ball Earth point of view.
To understand it properly, you must look at it from a Flat Earth point-of-view.
Neither is it [straight] in the Ball Earth model - unless you disregard the curvature under the line.
(a truly 'straight line' = "end up in outer space" - right?)
Of course, it is okay to do this on a map - in which case, we would be talking about a geographic straight line.
In the image below, the 'X' at the center would be the 'North Pole'. Every point on the circle is 'South' from/of there.
In the Flat Earth model, East-West at a particular location is in reality a tangent point of a circle.
The distance from that location to the 'North Pole' is the radius of the circle.
I'm not as stupid as you seem to think I am. Stop playing games.
Anyone can travel in circles, even in a small space. That doesn't equal going east or west in a straight line.
![]()
![]()
Finding a point on a disc and going around it like a needle on a record isn't a straight journey. It's constantly turning.
This is a straight line across a disc.
View attachment 244804
View attachment 244803

I'm not trying to understand fiction. Much less a conspicuous internet hoax like FE.
The photos from Sydney refute your flat Earth.


Peace and Good Morning
Good Morning!
It's afternoon for me though. That's due to the beautiful spherical Earth God made for us to live on. Praise The Lord!
![]()
Globalist propaganda = CGI = Computer Generated Imagery (movie industry/NASA/science fiction)
Love you in Christ and no offense take or given as it cannot separate us from the Love of God in our hearts thru Christ Jesus our Lord.
AND
Thank You for the kind response
You must know that the graphic I posted isn't a propaganda tool. It is not pretending to be an image from space.
It is a graphic which simply illustrates reality. The rotation of The Earth is fact. This is proven by our experience and observation
of the day/night cycle. That reality is not possible on a flat Earth.
We have pictures from space programs other than NASA. Some are private companies and show the same reality of a spherical Earth.
We have constant observation from The International Space Station. The eyewitnesses of the spherical earth are many. Flat earth witnesses are 0. NASA didn't have CGI in 1969. No one did.
I urge you to reassess this FE fooloishness. Pray for discernment. It's counter-productive to your Christian witness.
If you convince others that The Bible teaches a FE, why would they believe anything in The Bible is truth?
You must know that the graphic I posted isn't a propaganda tool. It is not pretending to be an image from space.
It is a graphic which simply illustrates reality. The rotation of The Earth is fact. This is proven by our experience and observation
of the day/night cycle. That reality is not possible on a flat Earth.
We have pictures from space programs other than NASA. Some are private companies and show the same reality of a spherical Earth.
We have constant observation from The International Space Station. The eyewitnesses of the spherical earth are many. Flat earth witnesses are 0. NASA didn't have CGI in 1969. No one did.
I urge you to reassess this FE fooloishness. Pray for discernment. It's counter-productive to your Christian witness.
If you convince others that The Bible teaches a FE, why would they believe anything in The Bible is truth?
None that say the earth is flat, thoughI'm not on either side, but scripture is always right even when it goes against what we see
or experience. You have to admit that there are scriptures that are intriguing to think about.
None that say the earth is flat, though![]()
Psalm 17:10-14And yet, none that say it’s not.![]()
Psalm 17:10-14
Their hearts are hard as nails, their mouths blast hot air. They are after me, nipping my heels,
determined to bring me down, Lions ready to rip me apart, young lions poised to pounce. Up,
God: beard them! break them! By your sword, free me from their clutches; Barehanded, God,
break these mortals, these flat-earth people who can’t think beyond today. I’d like to see their
bellies swollen with famine food, The weeds they’ve sown harvested and baked into famine
bread, With second helpings for their children and crusts for their babies to chew on.
I checked 60 (61?) versions. That's the only one that has those two words together.