I said two thirds never needed salvation. Not sure what speculation you think I said. You wondered if our Messiah is also their Messiah and I said I didn't think God would have ever made that promise.
I did give you the reasons why the male sperm is responsible for the sin nature and not the female ova. I don't mind if you disagree with the reasoning but to say there is no justification I think is pushing it a little far especially when you don't give an argument as to why my reasoning is faulty. Also I never blamed Adam for our sins, I said he was responsible for our sin nature. The sin nature, or what scripture calls "another law" Rom.7:23, is not the same thing as our personal sins we commit, we are responsible for those.
The worst of the cyclone should hit in about 10 hours so I may not be able to respond tomorrow. We will see how well the infrastructure stands.![]()
I think it is speculation to say that any imperfect creature does not need salvation.
And thus I reasonably infer that all creatures including angels must need Messiah.
Similarly, regarding our speculation about Mary's insemination, I think it more reasonable
to think that the HS implanted an untainted specially created zygote rather than using Mary's egg
and specially creating only the sperm.
I am glad you do not use our sin nature as an excuse to blame Adam for our sins,
but I think Eve should be given equal credit for our sin nature because they were one flesh.
Hope to hear from you tomorrow with no problem.
Have a nice night.