How do angels jibe with the Holy Spirit?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
My point is that having/asking questions does NOT indicate unbelief,
but rather not asking GOD questions does that, which A&E exemplified.
I understand that, but you mentioned you had a website, where by you allow atheists to ask you questions.

So I'm just asking are you asking questions here based on what they've asked or are they all your own questions ,?
 
Perhaps, although A&E should have asked God about what Satan said instead of believing it.
It is okay to wonder about problematic passages as long as we do not demand answers before dying.
In the meantime, we should interpret/harmonize problematic OT passages in light of the NT if possible.
When the NT is silent, we might be able to infer possible answers using right reasoning.

For example, we can infer that the angels had MFW, because some of them chose to do what warranted hell.
We can also infer that the angels in heaven accept Jesus as Messiah and cooperate with the HS. Thus, they
DO have a history of salvation that is somewhat different from that of humanity.

Regarding my other questions:

1. OT references to the "angel of God" might mean an actual angel.
2. The ministry of angels before Pentecost might be comparable to the ministry of John the Baptist before Jesus' baptism.
3. Thus, angels jibe with the HS (not sure about Revelation yet :^)
The angel where created for one purpose is my best answer to be servants, meaning they where created to follow Gods commands and be servants for him, by his creation his will, by his way, Does that mean Angels had moral free will to ? Well it doesn't rule it out, as How could they decide to rebel if they never had any inner freedom to say no.

At that point of rebellion do they stop being spirit is your question ?

Nope but they do become possessed with sin, impure spirit,

No longer clean spirits, but because there created with a different purpose to us there held more accountable and expelled forever.

and they where expelled for ever.

I don't think any angels can be saved, they where held more a accountabke than us.

It's no joke ignoring Gods will
 
Thanks, but my question was not about whether the HS was God. Here are some questions I have:

1. Are OT references to the angel of God NOT to God?

2. If angels are ministering spirits, does this not conflict with the ministry/work of the Holy Spirit?

3. Do angels jibe with the HS? Do they have a salvation history? Did Christ atone for their sins?
Are the good angels filled with the HS?

4. Etc.

the answer to 1. is a play on words God made angels for his will and pleasure. "The Angel of the Lord " seen in the Old Testament is more than anglos which is messenger. there are different works angels do and names they have like Cherubim's, ones who cry Holy holy holy Lord God Almighty. There are angels who watch, protect, and present to the throne of GOD.

2. No. angels ministering do not conflict with the work of the Holy Spirit.

3. do angels jibe with the Holy Spirit? not sure what that is meaning. do angels have salvation? no they obey or don't . Christ atone for the sins of man kind. God Spirit is in , with and upon the Believer. As God choose Himself to be with man and not angels he created.
 
The angel where created for one purpose is my best answer to be servants, meaning they where created to follow Gods commands and be servants for him, by his creation his will, by his way, Does that mean Angels had moral free will to ? Well it doesn't rule it out, as How could they decide to rebel if they never had any inner freedom to say no.

At that point of rebellion do they stop being spirit is your question ?

Nope but they do become possessed with sin, impure spirit,

No longer clean spirits, but because there created with a different purpose to us there held more accountable and expelled forever.

and they where expelled for ever.

I don't think any angels can be saved, they where held more a accountabke than us.

It's no joke ignoring Gods will

Re "you mentioned you had a website, where by you allow atheists to ask you questions": I don't mention that any more because it was deemed to be disallowed by CC rules.

Re "So I'm just asking are you asking questions here based on what they've asked or are they all your own questions?": Most are mine,
because most atheists are not interested in angelology.

I see we agree that angels must have MFW and that the fallen angels cannot be saved. I think that because the just consequence
for rejecting GW was consignment to hell, God planned a better way to create souls who could be redeemed from sin via Christ's atonement: humanity.

Also, my belief is that finite sinners suffer finite consequences for their sins in hell, after which their spirits/souls are destroyed.

Re "ignoring GW is no joke": You got that right, brother!
 
the answer to 1. is a play on words God made angels for his will and pleasure. "The Angel of the Lord " seen in the Old Testament is more than anglos which is messenger. there are different works angels do and names they have like Cherubim's, ones who cry Holy holy holy Lord God Almighty. There are angels who watch, protect, and present to the throne of GOD.

2. No. angels ministering do not conflict with the work of the Holy Spirit.

3. do angels jibe with the Holy Spirit? not sure what that is meaning. do angels have salvation? no they obey or don't . Christ atone for the sins of man kind. God Spirit is in , with and upon the Believer. As God choose Himself to be with man and not angels he created.

Thanks for your answers, CS, which I understand as follows, with my comments in brackets:

1. "The Angel of the Lord" in the OT refers to God. There are other "angels" who watch, protect, and present to the throne of GOD.
[I agree that the most obvious meaning of "The Angel of the Lord" (Gen. 22:11) is to God Himself, but in the NT "the" is "an", which
indicates it is NOT God Himself but rather someone like Gabriel (Luke 1:19). In Matt. 1:20 & 24 "an" IS "the", and in Gal. 4:14 Paul writes as though "an" angel of God were "the" Christ Jesus himself.]

2. No. angels ministering do not conflict with the work of the Holy Spirit, the HS does not watch, protect and present.
[Matt. 4:11 mentions that angels "attended" Jesus after he was tempted by the devil, whatever that means, but Matt. 18:10
and Acts 12:15 mentions angels as though they are avatars of believers. Heb. 1:14 says angels are spirits sent to serve those
who have the Holy Spirit. In John 14-16 the HS is described as teaching GW to believers, whereas in Heb. 2:1-4 it is angels
who are described as conveying GW and the HS is described as the distributor of gifts. Such passages make it difficult
for me to develop a doctrine of angelology; I don't know about you.]

3. Not sure whether angels jibe with the HS, but angels do not have salvation; they obey or don't. Christ only atoned
for the sins of mankind. God's Spirit is only in, with and upon the Believer. God did not choose Himself to be with angels.
[I am not sure whether they jibe either, but do you believe they are programmed to obey or not obey? I agree that the Bible
does not teach a POS for angels.]

Over...
 
Re "you mentioned you had a website, where by you allow atheists to ask you questions": I don't mention that any more because it was deemed to be disallowed by CC rules.

Re "So I'm just asking are you asking questions here based on what they've asked or are they all your own questions?": Most are mine,
because most atheists are not interested in angelology.

I see we agree that angels must have MFW and that the fallen angels cannot be saved. I think that because the just consequence
for rejecting GW was consignment to hell, God planned a better way to create souls who could be redeemed from sin via Christ's atonement: humanity.

Also, my belief is that finite sinners suffer finite consequences for their sins in hell, after which their spirits/souls are destroyed.

Re "ignoring GW is no joke": You got that right, brother!
you don't have to mention your website to simply ask if your asking questions for yourself or someone else.

If you throw in questions of your own mixed in with questions from atheists, you should make it clear you are , so we don't think what the hec is this about.

The rule you broke was you broke was promoting your website,

The reason you were just given a ticking of was, because of your good intension to reach out to atheists.

But still im a having a hard time wondering, if theses questions from Unbelievers are making you unsure about things to much yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
you don't have to mention your website to simply ask if your asking questions for yourself or someone else.
If you throw in questions of your own mixed in with questions from atheists, you should make it clear you are , so we don't think what the hec is this about.
The rule you broke was you broke was promoting your website,
The reason you were just given a ticking of was, because of your good intension to reach out to atheists.

But still im a having a hard time wondering, if theses questions from Unbelievers are making you unsure about things to much yourself.

I address the questions asked by atheists in the Apologetics thread.
The questions asked here are those begged by references to angels in Scripture.
As I indicated, I no longer even mention uno what just to be safe.

Apparently you do NOT get my point that having/asking questions of God does NOT indicate unbelief,
but rather NOT asking God for answers does that, which A&E exemplified.
 
I address the questions asked by atheists in the Apologetics thread.
The questions asked here are those begged by references to angels in Scripture.
As I indicated, I no longer even mention uno what just to be safe.

Apparently you do NOT get my point that having/asking questions of God does NOT indicate unbelief,
but rather NOT asking God for answers does that, which A&E exemplified.
why is it you can't answer my simple question and assume something else ?

I'm asking you if any the questions you have asked already to me is based on what someone else as asked you ?

It's a simple question

Could you answer please.
 
why is it you can't answer my simple question and assume something else ?

I'm asking you if any the questions you have asked already to me is based on what someone else as asked you ?

It's a simple question

Could you answer please.

No.
 
You won't even take no for an answer!?
Let's move on.
what are you saying no to is the question.

We can move on when you've answered,

Because I can't move on because you have made an assumption of my question.
 
what are you saying no to is the question.

We can move on when you've answered,

Because I can't move on because you have made an assumption of my question.

I have no idea what you are talking about. You were communicating fine through #202,
but then you went off the rails, so happy trails unless you reply to #204 in a way that moves the discussion forward.
 
I have no idea what you are talking about. You were communicating fine through #202,
but then you went off the rails, so happy trails unless you reply to #204 in a way that moves the discussion forward.
back with the same old same old, ok well don't answer then,

It's really is remarkable how you hold people to account with other peoples views, and not even disclose they are your own questions.

Leading people into unnecessary obligation, may be a happy trail to you, but not me.

If I knew I was addressing you, it would make it better,

But you just playing this game, that we should be held account to answer the hidden questions, to help some imaginary idea out
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
In Rev. 13:1-10 John says the dragon was by the sea and a beast came out of the sea that had ten horns with crowns and seven heads (cf. Rev. 12:3) with a blasphemous name on each. (This will be explained in Rev. 17:7-18.) One of the heads had what seemed to be a fatal wound that had been healed (cf. Gen. 3:15). The beast resembled a leopard but had feet like a bear and a mouth like a lion (cf. Dan. 7:1-7). The dragon gave the beast his power and throne, and the whole world worshipped the dragon and the beast, asking "Who can defeat the beast?"

The beast was allowed to blaspheme God and exercise authority for 42 months (Rev. 11:2-9, 12:6&14), defeating the saints and all inhabitants of earth whose names were not written in the Lamb's book of life from the creation of the world. The book of life was introduced in Rev. 3:5 and will be mentioned again in Rev. 17:8, 20:12&15, 21:27 and 22:19. This defeat and falling away initially occurred during the reign or Emperor Nero, who persecuted Christians almost to extinction (cf. 1Tim. 4:1, 6:20-21, 2Tim. 3:1&12, 4:17, 1John 2:18-19), but it may also have a final fulfillment before the end of history.

John concluded this passage by saying, "He who has an ear, let him hear", a phrase spoken many times by Jesus (Matt. 11:15, Mark 4:9, Luke 14:35). What John wanted people to hear here is this: "Anyone bound for captivity will go into captivity, and anyone bound to be slain will be killed. This calls for faithful endurance [perseverance] by the saints."

In Rev. 13:11-18 John saw another beast coming out of the earth that looked like a lamb with two horns and spoke like a dragon (cf. Rev. 13:1, 16:13, 19:20), which made Earthians worship the first beast whose wounds had been healed (Rev. 13:3) by deceiving them with miracles such as causing fire to fall from heaven (cf. 2Kings 1:10). This deception was foretold by Jesus (in Matt. 24:5&11, cf. Matt. 7:15, John 8:42-44, Deut. 13:1-5.) Chilton thinks the first beast represents Rome and the second is Pharisaic/Talmudic Judaism (p. 336-337, cf. Acts 4:25-27).

This beast ordered Earthians to set up an image of the first beast (cf. Dan. 3:1-7, Rom. 2:22), and he was given power to make the image speak (cf. Psa. 135:15-16) and command that all who refused to worship him be killed. At this juncture it is important to realize that all false ideologies are dictatorial and murderous, whereas God wants to persuade sinners to convert/repent and freely embrace the Christ and the Gospel (Acts 18:4, 2Cor. 5:11).

The second beast also forced all Earthians to receive a mark on the right hand or forehead, without which no one could conduct business. The mark was the name of the beast or the number of his name, 666, which represents humanity/Earthians (cf. 1Kings 10:14). Numerous places in Scripture associate the number six with humanity (Gen. 1:24-31, Exo. 20:8-11, 21:2, Num. 35:9-15, Dan. 3:1) and the number seven with divinity. We can see that 666 is 6 x 10 x 10 (and what Chilton notes on p. 347-349 is the "triangular" of the square of 6 that contains 12 triangles representing 12 months or 1,260 days), which signifies the ultimate Antichrist.
 
In Rev. 14:1-13 John saw the Lamb on Mount Zion (cf. Psa. 2:6-7, Matt. 21:5, John 12:15, Rom. 9:33, 11:26, Heb. 12:22, 1Pet. 2:6) with 144,000 disciples (Israelites per Rev. 7:4-8, cf. Rom. 11:5), and he heard a loud sound from heaven like that of harpists (Rev. 5:8), who sang a new song (Rev. 5:8-9, Psa. 98:5, 96:1, 40:3, 149:1) before the throne that only the redeemed could learn. John described the redeemed as those who were sexually pure or were not adulterers (Rev. 14:8, 2:14&20-22), the firstfruits (Rom. 8:23, 1Cor. 15:23) of those who followed the Lamb (Matt. 9:9, 10:38, 16:24) and as those who never lied (Zeph. 3:12-13, cf. Rom. 1:22-25, Eph. 4:24-27).

Then John saw an angel flying to every nation on earth with the eternal gospel (Mark 1:14-15, Matt. 24:14, Rom. 10:15-18) and urging people to glorify God the Creator at this hour of final judgment (Heb. 9:26-28). A second angel announced the fall of Babylon the Great, which had made all nations mad with the wine of adultery. It is not clear whether this refers to Jerusalem or to Rome or is symbolic of worldwide anti-Christian atheism.

A third angel warned that anyone who worshipped the beast and received his mark (Rev. 13:8&16) would drink the wine of God's wrath (Rev. 6:16, 19:15, Isa. 51:17, Jer. 25:15, Ezek. 20:18, Zeph. 1:15, Rom. 1:18) and be tormented forever with no rest (Matt. 11:28-30, 25:46). Enduring persecution calls for persevering faith in Jesus and obeying God's commandments (Matt. 10:22, 24:45-51, Jam. 5:7-9). Then John was told to write: Blessed are those who die in the Lord, for they will rest from their labor and reap reward for their deeds (cf. Matt. 5:10-12, Rom. 2:5-13, Heb. 4:9-11).
 
In Rev. 14:14-20 John saw the one like a son of man seated on a white cloud (Dan. 7:13, cf. Zeph. 1:15, Acts 1:9&11, Luke 21:27) holding a sickle (used to harvest wheat and mentioned seven times in this passage). Then three more angels appeared one at a time.

The fourth angel came out of the temple and said to reap, for the time is ripe, so the son of man swung his sickle and harvested the earth (mentioned six times in this passage), as Jesus portrayed via the Parable of the Weeds (Matt. 13:24-30, cf. Matt. 24:40-41).

A fifth angel appeared, also holding a sharp sickle, but he was told by yet another angel who was in charge of the altar fire to gather the grapes (Joel 3:13, cf. Isa. 5:1-7), which he did, throwing them into the winepress of God's wrath that was outside the city (in the Valley of Jehoshaphat per Joel 3:12?), where they were trampled, causing blood to flow out of the press rising as high as horses bridles for a distance of 1,600 stadia, which is about the length of Israel (per Chilton, p. 376). Thus, the Jordan River would run red as it flowed into the Dead Sea, which is reminiscent of the death of Pharaoh's soldiers in the Red Sea (cf. Exo. 14:23, 15:19-21), but this time Israel would not be spared.