Georgia man murdered while jogging. Judge declines to press charges
- Thread starter Dude653
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
In my opinion it was unconstitutional. A trial by jury should occur as that is our law system. A judge wasn't designed to be both judge and jury in cases like this. A judge can give their opinion based on law and evidence but ultimately it is the jury to decide. I took criminal justice for 3 years. This case is a mess.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Aubrey had walk through a construction site
The owner was contacted and issued a statement that nothing was taken and no property was damaged
There had been no recent burglaries in the area Few things to consider here
Arbery walked through an open construction site
Other people have been seen walking through also
According to the property owner nothing was taken and no property was damaged
the story about the rash of break-ins was also a lie as there were no recent break-ins in the area
The video shows Arbery jogging while confronted by two men and a truck
One of which blocks his pants holding a shotgun
Arbery,seeing a man come and get him with a shotgun fights back
demanding accountability of a judge who appears to be guilty of obstruction is not attacking him
The owner was contacted and issued a statement that nothing was taken and no property was damaged
There had been no recent burglaries in the area Few things to consider here
Arbery walked through an open construction site
Other people have been seen walking through also
According to the property owner nothing was taken and no property was damaged
the story about the rash of break-ins was also a lie as there were no recent break-ins in the area
The video shows Arbery jogging while confronted by two men and a truck
One of which blocks his pants holding a shotgun
Arbery,seeing a man come and get him with a shotgun fights back
demanding accountability of a judge who appears to be guilty of obstruction is not attacking him
Was Arbery a worker on the construction site? Did he own the construction site? Is he the same person seen at the construction site over a period of nights?
So now we've gone from innocently jogging down the road to within the sight of a crime. Whether he took anything or not, it's not unreasonable for the locals to be suspicious and ask questions.
Two white men try to stop him and ask him questions, he attacks them. He is the one at fault.
So now we've gone from innocently jogging down the road to within the sight of a crime. Whether he took anything or not, it's not unreasonable for the locals to be suspicious and ask questions.
Two white men try to stop him and ask him questions, he attacks them. He is the one at fault.
A crime might have been committed to your knowledge, either way it sure shows the white men weren't hunting him and had a reasonable suspicion at least enough to ask a question. Ultimately though indeed this is only support, the real meat is that assault is a crime, and Arbery committed assault and they had to defend themselves.
Incorrect, it is not illegal to own a gun nor to ask a question. They weren't holding him at gunpoint, he is the one that rushes them and attacks them. If you assault someone with a gun and they shoot you, that's your fault.
I'll ask again what I asked a few pages a go, I hate I have to ask it because it's such a stupid question, but it seems society is pretty far gone. Should the men just have let Arbery beat them and take their gun and possibly kill them because he thought he was above question?
I'll ask again what I asked a few pages a go, I hate I have to ask it because it's such a stupid question, but it seems society is pretty far gone. Should the men just have let Arbery beat them and take their gun and possibly kill them because he thought he was above question?
Calling him names doesn't mean anything, they could have called him everything and it wouldn't matter. It's not illegal to talk, especially in a public place like the road. I find you to be the subjective one rather. Objectively he assaults the men, that is a crime, and his attack is so savage it necessitated self defense. Hurting the feelings of the wicked isn't a crime.
-
1
- Show all
This young man looks like a very pleasant young man to me, with no ill intent toward anyone, I think this is a clear cut case of good ole boys from Georgia taking the law into their own hands, if I was a young black man and white men in a pickup truck with shotguns was chasing me, I would most def. try to get away from them and if that failed I would try to fight my way out, and it looks like that is just what he did. I believe he is innocent, and the perpetraters are evil people, with malicious intent.
-
1
- Show all