You are making claims for which there is no evidence in the text. NOTHING is said about forgiveness in this passage. There is not even a hint that the sacrifices were any sort of offering for sin.There are basic things we all understand. We know it takes blood and grace for forgiveness of our sin. We know we can't do this ourselves, it takes the blood shed by Christ. We all understand.
Cain wanted forgiveness, as he sacrificed to the Lord from his own hand. That is clear. Abel wanted forgiveness and he gave the blood of a lamb, symbolic of Christ. That is clear. Works of our hands do not save, the blood of Christ saves. Abel and Cain clearly show this.
Sorry, there is no Biblical evidence for this. In fact, there is evidence against it.Cain's offering was accepted
This is the key to Abel's offering. Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins. From the time of Adam to the time of Christ clean animals were to be sacrificed and their blood poured out so that there would be an atonement for sins. At the same time human beings were forbidden to consume blood, and that still applies to Christians. But atonement means a "covering".Abel's offering also pre-figured the need for a blood sacrifice...
I should think that when the Lord tells us of a sacrifice we would know what the Lord means by that, It was as a sacrifice that Cain and Abel acted.You are making claims for which there is no evidence in the text. NOTHING is said about forgiveness in this passage. There is not even a hint that the sacrifices were any sort of offering for sin.
I agree. However, it was not a sacrifice for sins committed.I should think that when the Lord tells us of a sacrifice we would know what the Lord means by that, It was as a sacrifice that Cain and Abel acted.
What was it a sacrifice for if not like the other sacrifices?I agree. However, it was not a sacrifice for sins committed.
The text doesn't tell us. We can look at Leviticus and Deuteronomy to see the various kinds of sacrifices/offerings; most had nothing to do with sin or forgiveness.What was it a sacrifice for if not like the other sacrifices?
In the past, I've just read this and not understanding it, passed it up. Does this mean that God likes Cattlemen, and not Farmers? I've heard others confidently offer explanations that made no more sense to me.
God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.I have tried to dissect this verse also.
I have looked at it and ask myself, is this a form of favoritism?
If it is a form of favoritism, there must be a reason.
It would also conflict other verses in the Bible.
Fast forward in the Bible and we learn and know that there is no favoritism with God.
Definitely a verse to study and look at it from every angle possible
self-taught is the problem there's love in i,,,We would say. Start with the first 4 in the new testament but if u r directed buy god...it won't matter where u start at..
You know what's disturbing? This is only the fourth chapter of the very first
book of the Bible.
When folks experience problems with the Bible so early-on, they should
probably expect things to become even more difficult with the remaining
65 books; most especially folks who are self-taught instead of instructed.
_
.
You know what's disturbing? This is only the fourth chapter of the very first
book of the Bible.
When folks experience problems with the Bible so early-on, they should
probably expect things to become even more difficult with the remaining
65 books; most especially folks who are self-taught instead of instructed.
_
Why do you look at what God wrote to you from your point of view and not as something God gives you from God's view of the world? From God's point of view, God determines if our sacrifices are correct s, God gives grace based on them. There is only one sacrifice that God accepts, and that is Christ, or the blood that was a symbol of Christ, God said blood was required for forgiveness of sin. Without blood, no forgiveness. God is eternal, so God does't change. What is true in the gospels is true at the beginning.I have tried to dissect this verse also.
I have looked at it and ask myself, is this a form of favoritism?
If it is a form of favoritism, there must be a reason.
It would also conflict other verses in the Bible.
Fast forward in the Bible and we learn and know that there is no favoritism with God.
Definitely a verse to study and look at it from every angle possible