M
Musilany
Guest
I know it's very very scary!!!!relativismm is in the church now, nobody cares what the bible says anymore!!!
My cousin was gay before he accepted jesus, and he did struggle at first But the Lord healed. Now he is happily married with a women and he became a pastor...Nothing is impossible for God...The bible says that God confused their hearts because of their disobedience but it also says that if they turn from their evil ways and repent that God will heal them, and my cusin is a proof of that.
I love this insight! I haven't heard this argument for a sinner's life before. Do you know where exactly in the Bible this is?
ok, i know pretty much nothing on this topic but as far as i have observed (nobody please take offince to this) People are not gay.They simply search for whats new, diffrent, sexy, and rebellious. The lust is when you can experience sothing new just to see if it feels better.
What about those gay people who haven't ever tried heterosexual sex?
You're offensive because you haven't bothered testing your opinion but think we need to hear it anyway. We shouldn't have to do your critical thinking for you. This is a special kind of lazy.
There are people who simply delve into homosexuality because they want to try something new. This is how you end up with some (notice the word "some" there) bisexuals, and some (note the word "some" again) homosexuals. Her hypothesis isn't completely off-base. I think you are overreacting.
Homosexuality isn't something you learn about in school, so where exactly did you expect this 15-year-old girl to test her opinion? You want her to walk up to every homosexual she knows and ask "So, how did you end up being homosexual?" Yeah, that'd go over real great.
At the age of 15, I knew how to say "some" if that is what I meant. I imagine you did too. Besides, if we're playing doctor and diagnosing lust in other people, we can't all the sudden hide behind our age. If she's too young to take criticisms of her opinion, she's too young to give it. I don't think she's too young, however - I think she can afford to think more deeply, even if she's only 15.
It certainly is better than saying, "you know, people are gay because they're lusty and looking for something new." Asking is always better than asserting.
Regardless, if she hasn't tested her opinions, why does she feel empowered to share them as fact? As she says: "i know pretty much nothing on this topic." When I recognize that I'm ignorant about something, I tend to listen, not tell people what sounds pretty.
I am not saying she is too young to take criticism. I am saying your brand of criticism was unnecessarily harsh, and coming from me that is saying alot because I can be rather harsh on this site.
There is no place in her post that she tried to pass off her beliefs of the matter as fact.
Try responding to her like the child that she is instead of treating her like some sort of evil politician that is trying to pass lies as truth.
Given what she was saying about all gay people, I think the tone fits. She does not get to make such sweeping and, in my opinion, cruel generalizations without opening herself up to equally harsh criticisms. She can tell a an entire subculture they're deluded by lust, but I can't tell one 15 year old girl she's been too lazy in critical thinking?
Why am I wearing kid gloves with somebody already throwing punches at any gay person who happens to stumble across this thread?
Then we're reading different posts. Not only is she passing it off as fact, she's using her beliefs as a recommendation for those around her.
I will take her as seriously as what she's said warrants.The opinions she's giving here and to her friends have the potential to do a lot of harm. Are you not worried about the children she's telling these things to? By her own admission, after all, she's spreading this among her peers.
What's so wrong with telling people they are living in lust exactly?
Someone who is homosexual is bound to have had lustful thoughts before, or else that person would not be a professing homosexual.
In order to know you are homosexual you have to have had lustful thoughts toward someone of the same sex before. You can't just say "I've never been attracted to someone of the same sex as me, but I know I'm a homosexual." That makes no sense. Upon what is this person basing his feelings?
Quite honestly, I really don't understand what was so horrible about this girl's post.
Honestly, I think she is on the right track, and I appreciate the fact that she is at least willing to spread her spiritual beliefs to her friends instead of hiding them or trying to water them down to make them more socially acceptable.
I'm not sure why you're asking this question. Her post indicates much more than that, that the person investigates homosexuality because they were so lustful that they had to seek out new experiences. This is not the same thing as telling somebody they're living in lust. She said: I'm explaining the genesis of homosexuality. You ask: Why is it wrong to tell someone they're lustful?
Apples, oranges.
How did her actual post apply to the virgin homosexual? When did he or she get a chance to get bored? Or what did it have to do with the 40 or 50 year old celibate who prays daily for God to burn the desires out of him? How many homosexuals are so bored with all the straight sex they've had that they go out seeking a new kind of titillation? How about the kid who senses same sex attraction before he has any idea what goes where?
Now "living in lust" is "having had lustful thoughts before."
And now "having had lustful thoughts" is "being attracted to someone of the same sex."
In any case, I'll answer the question directly - the person is definitely not basing his feelings on "I'm bored with chicks." The original post wasn't suggesting that the person called himself gay because he was attracted to a member of the same sex, but because he was bored and wanted something more. I don't know why you're on this tangent.
This is a false dichotomy. It would be best for her to refine them, then spread them. It is clear to me, however, that she hasn't spent much time testing her ideas, so I don't feel bad suggesting that she go back to that stage.
I understand you have a point you'd like to make about my style, but my goal isn't necessarily to convert this one girl to my way of thinking. Perhaps I'd like to blow off some steam at something very stupid that I read. In any case, I believe that her disregard for reality and the feelings of those who might actually not have bored themselves gay deserves the sort of response I gave.
You may differ, but, with your style, I don't see how I'll be convinced otherwise. (See how that works?)
I know it's very very scary!!!!relativismm is in the church now, nobody cares what the bible says anymore!!!
YES- BEING GAY IS A SIN! NO I AM NOT GAY! Why are gay people always trying to justify their sin! IT IS SIN. Not sayin you are,as you have said you arent: but homossexuality is an abomination before God and man alike-unless you are gay,of course! (or so they would have people believe).
When god created us it wasn't adam and steve-it was adam and eve!! also note that most gay people are also Catholic=think about this when the catholic priests are caught MOLESTING YOUNG BOYS! There is nothing to be unclear about,this is exactly right-homos will all be judged by God-and it won't go well for them. I'll get away from this now,or I will get vexed even more..
I understand you have a point you'd like to make about my style, but my goal isn't necessarily to convert this one girl to my way of thinking. Perhaps I'd like to blow off some steam at something very stupid that I read. In any case, I believe that her disregard for reality and the feelings of those who might actually not have bored themselves gay deserves the sort of response I gave.