here's a short homework page for you to work on while you investigate:
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/SMIII_Problem7.pdf
FLAT EARTH
- Thread starter mcubed
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
here's a short homework page for you to work on while you investigate:
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/SMIII_Problem7.pdf
lol
have you actually 'investigated' this old fable?
it is clear you have not.
years ago a senile old man claimed to have had a moon rock. he gave it to a small museum which didn't know any better and didn't investigate it at all at the time. later, upon investigation they discovered it wasn't. they also discovered there is nothing to back up the old man's story in the first place.
the old man, Drees, used to be the prime minister but had been out of office for 11 years by the date he claimed he had been given this rock, when he was 83 years old. he claimed that an US ambassador gave it to him, not an astronaut. this was only about 3 months after apollo 11 had returned to earth. ambassadors were not giving out moon rocks 3 months to anyone after apollo 11 returned; the whole thing was this older statesman's bad memory or wishful imagination from the beginning. also as we've previously covered, out of all three of the apollo 11 astronauts only Buzz Aldrin is a freemason, but no one ever said he had given this rock to Drees in the first place.
Ed, you're repeating a bunch of lies that even the smallest amount of actual investigation would uncover.
why are you doing this?
besides that, here is the gist of the argument you're making with this:
one person has an apple they claim is an orange.
you look at it and it is obviously not an orange.
you therefore claim there is no such thing as orange trees.
Gary looks at your argument and decides since there is obviously no such thing as orange trees, there must not be any such thing as Florida.
the person who claimed their apple is an orange turns out to be half blind & have alzheimers - he can't even remember his own name or tell the difference between a lemon and a potato.
what kind of 'investigation' is this supposed to be???
Once again you miss the MAIN point.
DECEPTION. Something that was ASSUMED as fact, was in fact, a deception. You left out pertinent facts of the account. The ex Prime Minister was given the rock by OUR ambassador, who doesn't deny that. Here is the story. But the MAIN point is the DECEPTION.
AMSTERDAM — It's not green cheese, but it might as well be.
The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.
Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity.
"It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," she said. "We can laugh about it."
The museum acquired the rock after the death of former Prime Minister Willem Drees in 1988. Drees received it as a private gift on Oct. 9, 1969, from then-U.S. ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their "Giant Leap" goodwill tour after the first moon landing.
Middendorf, who lives in Rhode Island, told Dutch broadcaster NOS news that he had gotten it from the U.S. State Department, but couldn't recall the exact details.
"I do remember that (Drees) was very interested in the little piece of stone," the NOS quoted Middendorf as saying. "But that it's not real, I don't know anything about that."
Advertise
He could not immediately be reached for comment Thursday.
The U.S. Embassy in the Hague said it was investigating the matter.
The museum had vetted the moon rock with a phone call to NASA, Van Gelder said.
She said the space agency told the museum then that it was possible the Netherlands had received a rock: NASA gave moon rocks to more than 100 countries in the early 1970s, but those were from later missions.
Ancient rock art from around the world"Apparently no one thought to doubt it, since it came from the prime minister's collection," Van Gelder said.
The rock is not usually on display; the museum is primarily known for its paintings and other works of fine art by masters such as Rembrandt.
A jagged fist-size stone with reddish tints, it was mounted and placed above a plaque that said, "With the compliments of the Ambassador of the United States of America ... to commemorate the visit to The Netherlands of the Apollo-11 astronauts." The plaque does not specify that the rock came from the moon's surface.
It was given at the opening of an exhibition on space exploration.
It was on show in 2006, and a space expert informed the museum it was unlikely NASA would have given away any moon rocks three months after Apollo returned to Earth.
Researchers from Amsterdam's Free University said they could see at a glance the rock was probably not from the moon. They followed the initial appraisal up with extensive testing.
"It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," Geologist Frank Beunk concluded in an article published by the museum.
He said the rock, which the museum at one point insured for more than half a million dollars, was worth no more than 50 euros ($70).
Van Gelder said one important unanswered question is why Drees was given the stone. He was 83 years old in 1969 and had been out of office for 11 years. On the other hand, he was the country's elder statesman, the prime minister who helped the Netherlands rebuild after World War II.
Middendorf was treasurer of the Republican National Committee from 1965 until 1969, when President Richard Nixon dispatched him to the Netherlands.
I don't need to investigate. I did that. I did NOT intend to prove the landings were a hoax. Wasn't my intent at all.
As I said, I thought it absurd. But too many things didn't add up, and for me, the silver bullet was the Belts. I saw some attempts by different people to explain them away, they were blatantly feeble at best.
As far as the money goes that may be the biggest joke yet in this whole thing.
I think Einstein said, "If you torture the stats long enough they will confess to anything". (Psst that was a joke) But a valid joke nonetheless. But that's what your chart looks like. A tortured stat.
That WE as a nation are EVER worried about, or constrained by money is ludicrous. Over 20 trillion in debt on the books. And in actual dollars, we have spent ENORMOUS amounts of cash on NASA. So much so that apparently they need to focus on space, but instead perpetrating the global warming hoax. Yup. That's a hoax too. Remember that god of this world deceiver thing?
Yes.
You said it was given by astronauts. False. Deception.
You said it was given by freemasons.
False. Deception.
You implied this calls into question the veracity of the apollo program.
False. Deception.
Earlier:
You promoted a video full of lies.
False. Deception.
You concluded that earth orbit isn't outer space.
False. Deception.
You said all astronauts were freemasons.
False. Deception.
You said a quote came from Einstein.
False. Deception.
You denied you had said so.
False. Deception.
Who is the liar here, dude?
I’m forced to use another Einstein quote. “You can lead a horse to water....”
I find it just easier to attribute all the sayings to him. He probably even started “Have a nice day”. And by all means. Do that.
UNLIKE the moon landing hoax, with all the evidence supporting that it is a hoax, especially the impenetrable radiation belts (gee. You could almost call that a firmament!), although compelling, the flat earth position doesn’t have enough evidence.
In fact, there may be a silver bullet against it. And that would be flights taken from Santiago Chile, to points in Australia or New Zealand. Apparently there are, and they fly exclusively over water. You can also mathematically figure out how long the flight should take. On a flat earth model you would have to fly over some land or have extraordinary long flights.
But even with the flat earth stuff, it shouldn’t be just poo pooped away.
In fact, there may be a silver bullet against it. And that would be flights taken from Santiago Chile, to points in Australia or New Zealand. Apparently there are, and they fly exclusively over water. You can also mathematically figure out how long the flight should take. On a flat earth model you would have to fly over some land or have extraordinary long flights.
But even with the flat earth stuff, it shouldn’t be just poo pooped away.
I have. It's beautiful! Saw the sunrise over the water, AND the sunset under the water on the same day in Cape May NJ recently. Pretty cool.
Hydrogen is everywhere lol, it’s abundant in human body’s, animals, planets, the atmosphere, the earth the universe it’s everywhere
What are you talking about the Radiation belt?, there’s no radiation belts, radiation that as well streams out from the sun in a 360 degrees flow from it.
what protects the earth from its atmosphere being stripped away is the magnetic sphere which the core of the earth Melton iron is generating.
Why can't the explanation be similar to ball-Earth? A wandering-star type object generally too far away to see, which comes into view every 76 years?
Pieces of sky?
In a dome-sky model, there is no place from which the meteorites can fall, and no place for the comets to "hide" when they aren't close to the sun. I don't see how physical laws permit it.
In a dome-sky model, the meteor(ites) can simply be pieces of sky (i.e. the dome).
The stars move within a shell or shells inside the firmament (dome), so comets would simply be on a different trajectory, similar to the planets, but far enough out to be invisible most of the time. Remember, Flat Earth theory doesn't require that light can be seen at vast distances as in ball-Earth theory. Indeed, the reason for day and night in Flat Earth theory is that light (even sunlight) is significantly impacted when travelling through atmosphere, as a torch light at night will eventually blur into darkness at distance.
As I said, I don't see how physical laws permit it. I reject the theory of light failing over distance as counterfactual.
It's easily demonstrable. Heard of fog-lamps, and why they are used? Fog is the same amount of atmosphere, just packed into a much smaller space.