Thanks for your reply , I think maybe my point is being lost . I'm simply trying to remind us all , but in particular those who would condemn a brother or sister for masturbation , that before they do that they should look at their own behaviour in regard to sex , even inside marriage . Contraception is not Biblical . It was invented by man so that we could all have intercourse without the consequence of pregnancy . So , if contraception isn't Biblical , and I'm guessing that very many married Christians use it , those who do should not b so quick to judge and condemn those who engage in masturbation .
That's all I'm trying to say , before u cast a stone......
My thoughts on this. In the Greek version of the Old Testament, where it says 'thou shalt not covet' uses a word for lust or covet. It is a grammatically infected form of the same word Matthew 5:28 uses where it tells how Jesus warned that a man that looks at a woman to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart.
We are talking about covetousness here. If I want to drive my own car, it's mine, so I don't covet it. If I am thankful to God and have a good attitude, it's okay to drive my car. If I want to have sex with my own wife, she's my own wife, so it's okay for me to desire that. If I were to use some kind of piece of rubber (no thank you) or something like that.... how does that somehow make it covetous? She's still MY wife birth control or not. She's not some other man's wife or someone else's daughter who is not married to me.
Does masturbation 'satisfy the lust of the flesh.' I'm not sure how that fits into the covetous concept one way or another. I can't find any specific scripture on masturbation, one way or another. Onan didn't raise up seed to his brother. That seems like coitus interruptus. Whether he used a bit of masturbation to make that happen, I don't know. Having sex with the woman, but not being willing to raise up seed to his brother... taking the sex... robbing her of the chance to have a child if he'd passed up on her and she'd gone to another relative... there is a lot going on her. But later theologians latched onto the non-reproductive sexual act aspect of it and named masturbation as 'Onanism.' I don't see anything in the passage that indicates that this is why God was displeased with him.
The man who has a seminal emission in the night in an Israeli war camp has to wash his clothes and be unclean until even and whatever it says in that passage. Normally, that might be an involuntary thing during sleep, but would the wording fit if the guy just did that. But the guy is unclean. A man and woman are unclean after the sexual act... assuming he 'finishes' in Jewish law, then they wash their whole body with water and are unclean until evening (which sounds to me like it encouraged couples having sex around 4 to 7 PM depending on the season of the year, about an our or a half hour before sundown so they didn't have to walk around a whole day unclean.) Being unclean isn't sinning. Jesus touched lepers.
I remember a guy in college thinking the verse about cutting off the hand or eye that causes you to sin being about masturbation, and he was glad it didn't say to chop off the other part. The idea of those verses being about masturbation had never occurred to me, and probably had more to do with his on guilt and conscience than the text. There is a verse about cutting of hand or foot, too.
I'm not going to tell someone to go masturbate, but I don't see from scripture that I have any right to condemn people for it, or for using birth control. I do see 'be fruitful and multiply' and if you have three kids between two people, that's multiplying. It doesn't say 'Thou shalt not use birth control.' If it's wrong to use birth control, then is it wrong for the married to abstain from sex during ovulation without a good reason (sickness, periods, etc.) because they are avoiding pregnancy? Is it wrong, then, to not have every sex every night because a couple could be missing out on having a baby...or every hour.... or during some sort of time where she would become pregnant at all times if she happened to ovulate during that interval. Of course, if everyone did that last approach, I think we might have all nearly girls because the XX cells hang around longer and the XYs swim faster. Is it wrong to delay marriage until you are ready to have a baby?
Basically, I think it helps to root the rational behind the questions to the teaching of scripture, not someone's thoughts or opinions about lust.