What precisely did he say that is objectionable, and upon what basis do you object to it?
His explanation of Romans in between 45:00 and 50:00 - to me, that's clearly wrong. National Israel is being heavily discussed in chapters 9, 10, and 11.
He seems to think that if chapter 11 is talking about national Israel, then there is a contradiction with chapter 9.... but that's not the case at all.
He totally breaks up the flow of this scripture in his "explanation" (which doesn't really explain anything).
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Now, I'm not going to pretend like I know 100% what this means... but this suggests to me that there is a partial blindness on Israel as a nation... UNTIL (yeah, Paul's talking about an event that is, relative to
him, IN THE FUTURE) the fullness of the gentiles be come in. The blindness is TEMPORARY. So, I don't know what this guy is ranting about. I'm pretty sure Paul is not referring to the church as Israel in these particular Romans passages- this guy is just trying to insert the context of other epistles into Romans.
So, then he goes on to say "Don't confuse the 'fullness of the gentiles' with the 'times of the gentiles'."
They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
He insists they must be different, but doesn't say why... Jerusalem has been trampled on by gentiles since it's destruction... but I think he's trying to say it's destruction was the fulfillment of the "times of the gentiles", but he doesn't really make a good case for it.
He put's his theological opponents on blast for "pride", but he is awful presumptuous himself. If he was actually a former believer of the dispensationalist interpretation, he should have been way better at debunking it. He doesn't make good arguments at all.