one has the mind of Christ because they believed.Does having the mind of Christ enable us to believe?
one has the mind of Christ because they believed.Does having the mind of Christ enable us to believe?
Both of you are skirting the question! I'll make it simple, it is a yes or no answer.one has the mind of Christ because they believed.
Would you also say God gave man life and since life is a gift and God's gifts are irrevocable then all men must live forever?Okm so we can agree that adam was given choice, and I would add that choice might've been the "kink" in the armor of God's plan for Him.. That is, giving man free will that is bound to make wrong choices. But wait, God makes no mistake, and His gifts are irrevocable so if God gave man free will there is good reason He wanted man to have it and so He would not take it away. Rather, in my perspective, He made it even more precious with Christ.
Sheesh, so I don't get a BillyBob diploma?You failed to answer my simple question!
Jesus said it a little differently. Hearing isn't hearing but not listening, but rather hearing but not understanding, and seeing isn't seeing but not looking but seeing and not understanding the significance and meaning of what they see. In other words, the true meaning is lost to them.Faith comes by hearing, so faith follows hearing. So, if we must believe then I'm supposing that hearing and believing are correlated as opposed to 'having ears but not hearing (that is, hearing but not listening) and "having eyes but not seeing (that is, looking but not seeing), which leads to faith (which is a faith that is the Holy Spirit saying, "Amen" with your spirit.
The pouring out of the Spirit being the tie-in .Yet Proverbs 1 is not Joel 2.
It just came to mind as I was preparing a cup of coffee to assuage this migraine developing, in regard to the making the choice with Christ more precious, Adam is told that if he ate, in dying you will die which alludes to the second death. And I'm not sure dying, twice which seems to imply a complete death, is actually a revocation of a gift or a (what's the other fancy word that alludes to surrendering something over?".Would you also say God gave man life and since life is a gift and God's gifts are irrevocable then all men must live forever?
Jesus said it a little differently. Hearing isn't hearing but not listening, but rather hearing but not understanding, and seeing isn't seeing but not looking but seeing and not understanding the significance and meaning of what they see. In other words, the true meaning is lost to them.
Ok, they didn't receive the understanding or meaning.In communications, I believe it is termed as "receiving."
Since you refuse to answer, I stand by my earlier post.Sheesh, so I don't get a BillyBob diploma?
Thank you! You have thought this out much deeper than I have. It's a lot to take in. I'm not laughing, but it will take some thought on my part.Well, thanks for asking. I have kind of a different take on that verse and John 3:16 too than most do. I posted it some time
ago but it wasn't really recognized, however, for me, in viewing it in this way, it seems to reconcile everything pretty well.
Now don't laugh when I say it, (lol that means you Cameron143), but I believe there are two worlds in view: 1) this current world which is to be destroyed, and 2) the world to come which will be eternal, and is, as I understand it, to be comprised of the saved.
Were it not so, it would mean that either God can't destroy that which He hates nor save that which He loves.
The world in 1John 2:2 and John 3:16, is the world to come, not this current world. That is the world which Jesus saved by
the forgiveness of sin.
I've found generally that the Bible can use the same name for the earthly for the spiritual, so this is where the "no verse of
prophecy is of any private interpretation" and "comparing the spiritual with the spiritual" comes it to play to determine
which one is in view. Okay, you can laugh now, Cameron143.
Hope this helps
The phrase God's gifts are irrevocable is paired with His call in Romans 11:29 ~ For God’s gifts and His call are irrevocable. Any who, Adam was of the natural world. I cannot count the number of times I have seen people say Adam was perfect. Eh? If Adam was perfect, would he have sinned? I don't think so. God called His handiwork good a number of times, and then very good after Eve was made. I don't know how free Adam's will was, and I do not believe slaves to sin have a will that is free either. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and the pride of life—is not from the Father but from the world.It just came to mind as I was preparing a cup of coffee to assuage this migraine developing, in regard to the making the choice with Christ more precious, Adam is told that if he ate, in dying you will die which alludes to the second death. And I'm not sure dying, twice which seems to imply a complete death, is actually a revocation of a gift or a (what's the other fancy word that alludes to surrendering something over?".
That is in regard to the prophet/Scripture writer, not us readers."no verse of prophecy is of any private interpretation"
I answered, it's just that you didn't accept it. But I don't begrudge you that freedom. I only request you ask yourself why actually believe something is so rather than using that particular belief as a "cookie cutter" to compare other perspectives against. Otherwise, you'll only see other cookie cutters as not the same as yours. But sometimes what looks like a star cookie cutter might actually turn out be a sunflower cookie cutter. Or an egg might actually be an egg. It's okay to think beyond what a teacher has shown you. I mean, I still love my kindergarten teacher for what she taught me.Since you refuse to answer, I stand by my earlier post.
Adam was given the ability to choose either good or evil. This ability was lost during the fall. Only the Spirit can restore this ability within fallen man.
The phrase God's gifts are irrevocable is paired with His call in Romans 11:29 ~ For God’s gifts and His call are irrevocable. Any who, Adam was of the natural world. I cannot count the number of times I have seen people say Adam was perfect. Eh? If Adam was perfect, would he have sinned? I don't think so. God called His handiwork good a number of times, and then very good after Eve was made. I don't know how free Adam's will was, and I do not believe slaves to sin have a will that is free either. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh, the desires of the eyes, and the pride of life—is not from the Father but from the world.
no its not. The question you purpose is TRICK ONE OR lacks context Biblically it can never be just yes or no. To you maybe. That is opinionatedBoth of you are skirting the question! I'll make it simple, it is a yes or no answer.
That is in regard to the prophet/Scripture writer, not us readers.
How can you reject Jesus without knowing what He said?Where did He say that?
Jesus said, “Whoever has ears to hear, let them hear.” Mark 4:9
If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear. Mark 4:23
The world cannot receive the Spirit of truth, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him.
Since you did not/would not answer my other question, I looked it up.
A divine appointment is when God arranges someone to witness or provide for another person at the appropriate moment.
It is understood to be an important event or meeting predetermined by divine guidance or ordination for a particular reason.
How many times have you met someone and chose not to be a witness to them?God creates the divine appointment.
Thank you! You have thought this out much deeper than I have. It's a lot to take in. I'm not laughing, but it will take some thought on my part.![]()