Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The Calvinists have abused this passage more than any other.
Completely de-Calvinized by reading 5 verses onward.
What do you think @HeIsHere @studier ?


[Jhn 14:17, 22-26 KJV]
17 [Even] the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. ...

22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?

23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.

25 These things have I spoken unto you, being [yet] present with you.

26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
 
The Calvinists have abused this passage more than any other.
Completely de-Calvinized by reading 5 verses onward.
What do you think @HeIsHere @studier ?


[Jhn 14:17, 22-26 KJV]
17 [Even] the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. ...

22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?

23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.

25 These things have I spoken unto you, being [yet] present with you.

26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: *****and***** ((43x), then ) my Father will love him, *****and***** ((43x), then ) we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

and
g2532
καὶ καίkai
((43x), then )
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
Except faith comes by hearing and by hearing the word of God so unless one somehow hears his words or he stirrs thir hearts they will not have faith because faith as the scriptures say comes from hearing the word of God.

The flesh does not produce faith because faith is spiritual


Hi Blain,

I'm not super interested in the topic of this thread, i loosely follow it once in a while.
But when you said, "the flesh does not produce faith because faith is spiritual," i felt bound to reply.

My reply isn't just for you only, its for all of us that has been deceived into thinking this way because of the mistranslation of pisteuo into the English.

Lets start with the first part of your statement, " the flesh does not produce faith."

In the Greek, we have the word pistis, which is where we get our english word "faith." But the Greek also has a corresponding verb to pistis, and that's pisteuo. Pisteuo, couldn't be translated into the english, because the English has no corresponding verb to our noun Faith. Pisteuo used 248 times in the Nt, is a verb, an action word, and communicates to us how Pistis or faith is applied.

Pisteuo and every other verb is an act, based upon a belief, sustained by confidence. So with that in mind let me ask you some questions.

1) When you ate your dinner last night, did you check and make sure your food was safe to eat? No, you fulfilled an act of Faith or pisteuo or what should have been called faithing when you chose to eat the food, based upon the belief the people who are invisible to you did their job correctly, sustained by consuming the meal even though there's a chance you could die from eating it. the hanging of your life on that meal was part of the equation.

2) When you went to sleep last night, did you check to make sure the air in your room was safe to breath? No, you fulfilled an act of pisteuo or what should have been called faithing when you chose to get into bed and fall asleep, based upon the belief the air was safe, sustained by a confident sleep that if the air was not safe, and your life was at risk.

3) When you got into your car to go to work, did you check your car for gas leaks or if the brake line was working right? No, you fufilled an act of faith and faithing when chose to start the car, based upon the belief your car was safe, sustained by confidently driving the car, even though if you were wrong your life was at stake.

4) When you drove your car through that busy intersection, did you make sure that guy getting the red light was doing what he was supposed to be doing? No, you fulfilled an act of faith and faithing when you drove through the intersection, based upon the belief everyone getting a red light was doing what they were supposed to be doing, sustained by confidentially driving through the intersection, even though if you were wrong you life was at risk.

I could give examples of this all day long, we fulfill (in the flesh) hundreds of acts or faith and faithing everyday. In fact, I'll go so far as to say we were created (in the flesh) to be faithers. But because the english doesn't have a word to correctly communicate this activity, it's virtually unknown. And what makes it worse, is the translators chose the words "believe, believer, and believing" to communicate this important word.

So, like i said, i'm not just calling you out, but trying to highlight a major problem in how we look at faith and faithing.

As faith and faithing relates to the living God. the vines Greek dictionary gives the best definition of this activity. "A personal surrender to Him, and a life inspired by such surrender." the act, making a personal surrendering of our lives to Him, based upon the belief that He will accept the surrendered life, sustained by the many little confident decisions we make everyday that show God we really do consider our lives to be His now, not ours.

I don't really care about how these daily choices play out in the topic of this thread. i just felt compelled to share this.

As for the spiritual component you highlighted, Faith and faithing are always based upon something we can't see. once our specific act of faith or faithing is fulfilled, it's not faithing anymore , it becomes a fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blain
Hi Blain,

I'm not super interested in the topic of this thread, i loosely follow it once in a while.
But when you said, "the flesh does not produce faith because faith is spiritual," i felt bound to reply.

My reply isn't just for you only, its for all of us that has been deceived into thinking this way because of the mistranslation of pisteuo into the English.

Lets start with the first part of your statement, " the flesh does not produce faith."

In the Greek, we have the word pistis, which is where we get our english word "faith." But the Greek also has a corresponding verb to pistis, and that's pisteuo. Pisteuo, couldn't be translated into the english, because the English has no corresponding verb to our noun Faith. Pisteuo used 248 times in the Nt, is a verb, an action word, and communicates to us how Pistis or faith is applied.

Pisteuo and every other verb is an act, based upon a belief, sustained by confidence. So with that in mind let me ask you some questions.

1) When you ate your dinner last night, did you check and make sure your food was safe to eat? No, you fulfilled an act of Faith or pisteuo or what should have been called faithing when you chose to eat the food, based upon the belief the people who are invisible to you did their job correctly, sustained by consuming the meal even though there's a chance you could die from eating it. the hanging of your life on that meal was part of the equation.

2) When you went to sleep last night, did you check to make sure the air in your room was safe to breath? No, you fulfilled an act of pisteuo or what should have been called faithing when you chose to get into bed and fall asleep, based upon the belief the air was safe, sustained by a confident sleep that if the air was not safe, and your life was at risk.

3) When you got into your car to go to work, did you check your car for gas leaks or if the brake line was working right? No, you fufilled an act of faith and faithing when chose to start the car, based upon the belief your car was safe, sustained by confidently driving the car, even though if you were wrong your life was at stake.

4) When you drove your car through that busy intersection, did you make sure that guy getting the red light was doing what he was supposed to be doing? No, you fulfilled an act of faith and faithing when you drove through the intersection, based upon the belief everyone getting a red light was doing what they were supposed to be doing, sustained by confidentially driving through the intersection, even though if you were wrong you life was at risk.

I could give examples of this all day long, we fulfill (in the flesh) hundreds of acts or faith and faithing everyday. In fact, I'll go so far as to say we were created (in the flesh) to be faithers. But because the english doesn't have a word to correctly communicate this activity, it's virtually unknown. And what makes it worse, is the translators chose the words "believe, believer, and believing" to communicate this important word.

So, like i said, i'm not just calling you out, but trying to highlight a major problem in how we look at faith and faithing.

As faith and faithing relates to the living God. the vines Greek dictionary gives the best definition of this activity. "A personal surrender to Him, and a life inspired by such surrender." the act, making a personal surrendering of our lives to Him, based upon the belief that He will accept the surrendered life, sustained by the many little confident decisions we make everyday that show God we really do consider our lives to be His now, not ours.

I don't really care about how these daily choices play out in the topic of this thread. i just felt compelled to share this.

As for the spiritual component you highlighted, Faith and faithing are always based upon something we can't see. once our specific act of faith or faithing is fulfilled, it's not faithing anymore , it becomes a fact.
Ok fair points, but now I have a question is there is a difference between dleshly faith and spiritual faith? Because in scripture and by scripture it speaks of faith by hearing the word of God now in every instance you mentioned there was no word of or from God so why did the scriptures say faith is produced by that if faith itself can be produced without that?
 
Ok fair points, but now I have a question is there is a difference between dleshly faith and spiritual faith? Because in scripture and by scripture it speaks of faith by hearing the word of God now in every instance you mentioned there was no word of or from God so why did the scriptures say faith is produced by that if faith itself can be produced without that?

[Gal 5:22 KJV] 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blain
The Calvinists have abused this passage more than any other.
Completely de-Calvinized by reading 5 verses onward.
What do you think @HeIsHere @studier ?


[Jhn 14:17, 22-26 KJV]
17 [Even] the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. ...

22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?

23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.

25 These things have I spoken unto you, being [yet] present with you.

26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

It is obvious that Christ Jesus is not teaching any sort of doctrine about total inability.
They read that idea into the text.
I too see the concept of "receive" as key in the text.

Jesus is speaking to people who have believed and because they have believed they can receive the "Comforter."

Of course the world cannot receive the Comforter because first they have to Believe In/Trust In Christ Jesus first!!!

When they do hear the Good News and if they decide to Trust in/Believe in Christ Jesus and His work on their behalf, they will also receive The Comforter.

I think Jesus is just saying The Comforter/Spirit of Truth is for those who believe, nothing about not being able to believe.

Disgusting how they take this out of context once again, they just makes a mess of scripture, another verse twisted to support an non-existent system! 🥀
They should come back to this thread and repent of spreading a false system, but they will not.
 
Hi Blain,

I'm not super interested in the topic of this thread, i loosely follow it once in a while.
But when you said, "the flesh does not produce faith because faith is spiritual," i felt bound to reply.

My reply isn't just for you only, its for all of us that has been deceived into thinking this way because of the mistranslation of pisteuo into the English.

Lets start with the first part of your statement, " the flesh does not produce faith."

In the Greek, we have the word pistis, which is where we get our english word "faith." But the Greek also has a corresponding verb to pistis, and that's pisteuo. Pisteuo, couldn't be translated into the english, because the English has no corresponding verb to our noun Faith. Pisteuo used 248 times in the Nt, is a verb, an action word, and communicates to us how Pistis or faith is applied.

Pisteuo and every other verb is an act, based upon a belief, sustained by confidence. So with that in mind let me ask you some questions.

1) When you ate your dinner last night, did you check and make sure your food was safe to eat? No, you fulfilled an act of Faith or pisteuo or what should have been called faithing when you chose to eat the food, based upon the belief the people who are invisible to you did their job correctly, sustained by consuming the meal even though there's a chance you could die from eating it. the hanging of your life on that meal was part of the equation.

2) When you went to sleep last night, did you check to make sure the air in your room was safe to breath? No, you fulfilled an act of pisteuo or what should have been called faithing when you chose to get into bed and fall asleep, based upon the belief the air was safe, sustained by a confident sleep that if the air was not safe, and your life was at risk.

3) When you got into your car to go to work, did you check your car for gas leaks or if the brake line was working right? No, you fufilled an act of faith and faithing when chose to start the car, based upon the belief your car was safe, sustained by confidently driving the car, even though if you were wrong your life was at stake.

4) When you drove your car through that busy intersection, did you make sure that guy getting the red light was doing what he was supposed to be doing? No, you fulfilled an act of faith and faithing when you drove through the intersection, based upon the belief everyone getting a red light was doing what they were supposed to be doing, sustained by confidentially driving through the intersection, even though if you were wrong you life was at risk.

I could give examples of this all day long, we fulfill (in the flesh) hundreds of acts or faith and faithing everyday. In fact, I'll go so far as to say we were created (in the flesh) to be faithers. But because the english doesn't have a word to correctly communicate this activity, it's virtually unknown. And what makes it worse, is the translators chose the words "believe, believer, and believing" to communicate this important word.

So, like i said, i'm not just calling you out, but trying to highlight a major problem in how we look at faith and faithing.

As faith and faithing relates to the living God. the vines Greek dictionary gives the best definition of this activity. "A personal surrender to Him, and a life inspired by such surrender." the act, making a personal surrendering of our lives to Him, based upon the belief that He will accept the surrendered life, sustained by the many little confident decisions we make everyday that show God we really do consider our lives to be His now, not ours.

I don't really care about how these daily choices play out in the topic of this thread. i just felt compelled to share this.

As for the spiritual component you highlighted, Faith and faithing are always based upon something we can't see. once our specific act of faith or faithing is fulfilled, it's not faithing anymore , it becomes a fact.
Lovely...

As faith and faithing relates to the living God. the vines Greek dictionary gives the best definition of this activity. "A personal surrender to Him, and a life inspired by such surrender." the act, making a personal surrendering of our lives to Him, based upon the belief that He will accept the surrendered life, sustained by the many little confident decisions we make everyday that show God we really do consider our lives to be His now, not ours.
 
It is obvious that Christ Jesus is not teaching any sort of doctrine about total inability.
They read that idea into the text.
I too see the concept of "receive" as key in the text.

Jesus is speaking to people who have believed and because they have believed they can receive the "Comforter."

Of course the world cannot receive the Comforter because first they have to Believe In/Trust In Christ Jesus first!!!

When they do hear the Good News and if they decide to Trust in/Believe in Christ Jesus and His work on their behalf, they will also receive The Comforter.

I think Jesus is just saying The Comforter/Spirit of Truth is for those who believe, nothing about not being able to believe.

Disgusting how they take this out of context once again, they just makes a mess of scripture, another verse twisted to support an non-existent system! 🥀
They should come back to this thread and repent of spreading a false system, but they will not.
As you can see, the Calvinists have vacated the premises.
They have no answer.

And what about their bizarre notion that there is no such thing as "freewill" in terms of Bible content?

https://christianchat.com/threads/can-we-really-exercise-free-will.218061/post-5659445

https://christianchat.com/threads/can-we-really-exercise-free-will.218061/post-5659451
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
[Gal 5:22 KJV] 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
Any of this sinking in buddy? Hope so.
Time for you to abandon ship huh?
 
As you can see, the Calvinists have vacated the premises.
They have no answer.

And what about their bizarre notion that there is no such thing as "freewill" in terms of Bible content?

https://christianchat.com/threads/can-we-really-exercise-free-will.218061/post-5659445

https://christianchat.com/threads/can-we-really-exercise-free-will.218061/post-5659451
you where given a real good reason in my last reply to you which you've ignored

Now you've added to scripture here and included something that is not there heres how it reads

13 Now I decree that any of the Israelites in my kingdom, including priests and Levites, who volunteer to go to Jerusalem with you, may go.

Those who will offer a good will gestures will have the fathers devine mercy in there hearts, The lords children whom the father is building up.
 
It is obvious that Christ Jesus is not teaching any sort of doctrine about total inability.
They read that idea into the text.
I too see the concept of "receive" as key in the text.

Jesus is speaking to people who have believed and because they have believed they can receive the "Comforter."

Of course the world cannot receive the Comforter because first they have to Believe In/Trust In Christ Jesus first!!!

When they do hear the Good News and if they decide to Trust in/Believe in Christ Jesus and His work on their behalf, they will also receive The Comforter.

I think Jesus is just saying The Comforter/Spirit of Truth is for those who believe, nothing about not being able to believe.

Disgusting how they take this out of context once again, they just makes a mess of scripture, another verse twisted to support an non-existent system! 🥀
They should come back to this thread and repent of spreading a false system, but they will not.
Maybe it is just because I am tired and could not sleep last night but what exactly is the point you are making here? and also can you explain this?

  1. 1 Corinthians 2:14
    The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.
    Learn more:
    1
    1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not a…

    biblehub.com

    2
    1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not a…

    biblehub.com

    3
    1 Corinthians 2:14-3:15,1 John 1 NKJV - But the n…

    biblegateway.com

    4
    What does 1 Corinthians 2:14 mean? | BibleRef.c…

    bibleref.com

    5
    oremus Bible Browser : I Corinthians. 2:6-16

    bible.oremus.org

    6
    1 Corinthians 2:14,Romans 8:5-10 KJ…

    biblegateway.com

    7
    1 Corinthians 2:14 KJV: But the natural man rec…

    biblehub.com


  2. Bible Hub
    https://biblehub.com

    1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not accept the things that …
    But the natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he is not able to understand them, because spiritually they are discerned.
 
Maybe it is just because I am tired and could not sleep last night but what exactly is the point you are making here? and also can you explain this?

  1. 1 Corinthians 2:14
    The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.
    Learn more:
    1
    1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not a…

    biblehub.com

    2
    1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not a…

    biblehub.com

    3
    1 Corinthians 2:14-3:15,1 John 1 NKJV - But the n…

    biblegateway.com

    4
    What does 1 Corinthians 2:14 mean? | BibleRef.c…

    bibleref.com

    5
    oremus Bible Browser : I Corinthians. 2:6-16

    bible.oremus.org

    6
    1 Corinthians 2:14,Romans 8:5-10 KJ…

    biblegateway.com

    7
    1 Corinthians 2:14 KJV: But the natural man rec…

    biblehub.com

  2. Bible Hub
    https://biblehub.com

    1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not accept the things that …
    But the natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he is not able to understand them, because spiritually they are discerned.

Do you believe that all writings, especially scripture need to be read/interpreted using the principles of hermeneutics?
 
Do you believe that all writings, especially scripture need to be read/interpreted using the principles of hermeneutics?
Well I don't know what hermeneutics is but I believe that scripture is to be taken as is it says what means and means what it says
 
Well I don't know what hermeneutics is but I believe that scripture is to be taken as is it says what means and means what it says

Well, maybe that is something you should read, find a video, about that first.
 
Well, maybe that is something you should read, find a video, about that first.
The mere fact it is a form of interpreting literature especially scripture tells me that I likely do not subscribe to it, if interpretation is in the picture then to me that is adding our own understanding to scripture which we are told not to do in the bible.

So if one needs to overcomplicate or add to scripture then maybe they should rethink about their way of studying the word of God

Honestly scripture is supposed to be able to be understood even by children so if it doesn't say something then that isn't what it is saying, I learned from Jesus himself how to read scripture and believe me it was not in a good way I got a very stern look from him when I tried adding my interpretation to his teaching so I take scripture as is no interpretation no fancy methods of understanding just take it as it is
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
Honestly scripture is supposed to be able to be understood even by children

You sure?

NKJ 2Pet3:15-16 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation-- as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, 16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.

As one very dedicated and high energy student and pastor-teacher said after studying and teaching the Text for several decades: 'no man can learn this Book in a lifetime...'
 
The mere fact it is a form of interpreting literature especially scripture tells me that I likely do not subscribe to it, if interpretation is in the picture then to me that is adding our own understanding to scripture which we are told not to do in the bible.

So if one needs to overcomplicate or add to scripture then maybe they should rethink about their way of studying the word of God

Honestly scripture is supposed to be able to be understood even by children so if it doesn't say something then that isn't what it is saying, I learned from Jesus himself how to read scripture and believe me it was not in a good way I got a very stern look from him when I tried adding my interpretation to his teaching so I take scripture as is no interpretation no fancy methods of understanding just take it as it is


The written word has meaning, hermeneutics is the method to make sure the reader has the correct/right meaning.

The Gospel/Good News can be understood by children, not all of scripture.

Denouncing critical thought and analysis is not a good look for any Christian, imo.
Really sad.
 
Well I don't know what hermeneutics is but I believe that scripture is to be taken as is it says what means and means what it says
Great. You have plenty of fine non-Calvnist fodder here to ruminate on.

If in fact you have the appetite for it....