Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
2 Thessalonians 2:10 KJV
"And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish;
because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved."

I think the verse speaks for itself.
However, if you need me to walk you through what it already says in plain English, I am happy to help.
2 Thessalonians 2:10 KJV tells us that the reason those who perish face destruction is because they refuse to receive the love of the truth, even though they might be saved if they accepted it. The responsibility for their perishing is on their refusal to receive the love of the truth so that they could be saved, not because God did not choose to regenerate them against their free will.



....
So what is God allowing here ?

And Is this your definition of God allowing a person to reject his ways,

The only thing i can see that God is allowing, is his punishment to happen for them rejecting Him.

Which in Thessalonians 2 all the people who have rejected his ways all get decieved by the devil and believe the devil.

Did God allow that to ?

Nope God gave his one and only son to free people from the devils snare.

You've very much got scripture backwards
 
2 Thessalonians 2:10 is not going anywhere. Whenever you can, that would be great.
But like I said, no Calvinist has ever truly addressed the plain meaning of this verse word-for-word.



.,,,,
What's the big deal? They didn't receive the love of truth. Pretty straightforward. No reason is given for why.
 
John Calvin laid the groundwork. The heart of this theological system comes directly from John Calvin himself. While Calvin drew deeply from Augustine’s emphasis on the sovereignty and grace of God, he shaped a distinct and influential teaching on salvation. In Calvin’s writings, we already find the major doctrines later associated with Calvinism: the deep moral inability of fallen man, God’s unconditional choice to save, a redemption designed for the elect, the effective drawing of God that brings sinners to faith, and the perseverance of those truly born again. These core ideas were present from the beginning, even though Calvin never arranged them into the later TULIP format or listed them as five points.

After Calvin’s death, Theodore Beza continued to carry forward and better articulate the same doctrines with greater clarity and detailed reasoning, strengthening the theological structure already laid down by Calvin. In his works, the themes that would one day be summarized as TULIP appear with strong definition. Yet Beza likewise did not create the TULIP acronym or publish a tidy five-point summary.

The familiar five-point expression did not arise until the Synod of Dort in 1618–1619, when Reformed leaders needed a concise response to the five points raised by the Arminian Remonstrants. Dort did not invent new theology. It simply organized existing Reformed teaching into a clear and memorable response that later came to be known as TULIP.



....
I told you the other day I've changed my mind about isms being permitted in Christianity because Evangelism and anglicism is allowed how do you know John Calvin wasn't practicing both 😁
 
What's the big deal? They didn't receive the love of truth. Pretty straightforward. No reason is given for why.
He claiming That God allows people to reject his way and hes using Thessalonians 2 as the reason ?

He's absolutely nuts
 
He claiming That God allows people to reject his way and hes using Thessalonians 2 as the reason ?

He's absolutely nuts
The verse doesn't say why an individual doesn't receive the love of the truth; only that they don't. No different than Romans 1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jordon
Had to just check it was Romans 1 Cameron

Yep and it is

power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
 
power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.