Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Is this not their doctrine in its simpliest format.

god created people so they cannot believe the Good News, so therefore god regenerates first those he has especially created for salvation and then he bestows belief.

What is there to misrepresent, what is not acceptable is laying bare the "system" for what it is.
Wrong right off the bat, but then as a Pelagian heretic you and your ilk reject what Scripture says about man. Adam is responsible for the fall man and the estate that man gets born into. Please read your Bible. Start with Genesis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
Level with me, please.

Do you understand what TULIP declares?

Do you agree with it?
All doctrines are open for interpretation ? The labeling of doctrine could not have gots it's message across without making people see the harsh reality we all face. The labelling of the doctrine is the meat of the word, whilst the full understanding is a mixture of the milk and the meat

The truth is in your level playing field you deem the meat to be to harsh,

I suggest you get over it

One discrepancy I have with tulip is irresistible grace should probably be enabling grace.

But it's neither here or there for me.
No biggy really.

Totally depraved is 100 percent true,,, for the naturally wicked heart is totally depraved without God.
 
Is this not their doctrine in its simplest format....


>>>>>god created people so they cannot believe the Good News, so therefore god regenerates first those he has especially created for salvation and then he bestows belief on those he created for salvation.

What is there to misrepresent, what is not acceptable, is laying bare the "system" for what it is.

That teaching is Satan making a fist at God, telling God, that He made Satan to reject Him.

It's Satan's big excuse!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
Show it to me. You made an accusation. Now show me from my posts where I have deliberately misrepresented other people's beliefs.

So did God determine the human nature after the fall, in a post, many pages back, you agreed that god was responsible/determined the fallen nature of man?
 
All doctrines are open for interpretation ? The labeling of doctrine could not have gots it's message across without making people see the harsh reality we all face. The labelling of the doctrine is the meat of the word, whilst the full understanding is a mixture of the milk and the meat

The truth is in your level playing field you deem the meat to be to harsh,

I suggest you get over it

One discrepancy I have with tulip is irresistible grace should probably be enabling grace.

But it's neither here or there for me.
No biggy really.

Totally depraved is 100 percent true,,, for the naturally wicked heart is totally depraved without God.


Enabling grace is what I have been arguing for.
Irresistible grace is what they have been trying to rub in our noses.

Irresistible grace denies the person his right to choose.
One must cease being who they are and be replaced by a programmed clone.
Therefore, God does not save you.
He only saves the clone.

That is what they leave us with.
 
So did God determine the human nature after the fall, in a post, many pages back, you agreed that god was responsible/determined the fallen nature of man?
I didn't agree that god did anything. The nature of man post-fall is the result of actions God took. He isn't responsible for man's fall, but who do you think brought about the results of the fall if not God?
 
I didn't agree that god did anything. The nature of man post-fall is the result of actions God took. He isn't responsible for man's fall, but who do you think brought about the results of the fall if not God?

I am not asking about the cause of the fall, I am asking about the nature of fallen man, did God determine that nature?
 
The fact that you could insult a unicorn sir, is testimony to your inability to see your errors as far as I'm concerned

Did not catch the horn till later on.
Only was concentrating on the weird spirit that emanates from the image.

Unicorns are for fairy tales. Not truth.
 
More gobbledygook. Knowing Christ is much more than mere doctrine.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God. Jn 1:1
And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory
as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. Jn 1:14

..... You still have no idea what it is all about.
You can not know Him unless you have accurate, sound teachings from the Word.



......
 
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God. Jn 1:1
And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory
as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. Jn 1:14

..... You still have no idea what it is all about.
You can not know Him unless you have accurate, sound teachings from the Word.



......
I met Christ long before I understood doctrine. I will grant you that I have grown to know Him more fully as I have grown in the knowledge of Him, but that knowledge of Him is both the truth about Him as well as the experience of Him. As I said, it is more than simply doctrine. It is doctrine experienced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rufus
I appreciate the thank you but would rather you answer my question.

I agree God determined it, but I do not agree with Augustine's view of the fallen human nature.

I think the church fathers before him had the correct view.