Yes, we know what you mean. Some of those people are called heretics, Pelagian heretics, sir, and they proliferate here...some people say I don't need to be told to be good because you say so. I am good, you know what i mean sir.
Yes, we know what you mean. Some of those people are called heretics, Pelagian heretics, sir, and they proliferate here...some people say I don't need to be told to be good because you say so. I am good, you know what i mean sir.
Oh dear, Roger, those who scream so much against God's sovereignty are really gonna go into conniptions about Him causing us to obey. Their attitude regarding God acting unilaterally = He is an unjust tyrannical monster kidnapping people against their free will.
![]()
From Romans 7 verses 18-19 Journey from Inability to Ability I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out... I keep on doing the evil I do not want to do. Praise be to God for circumcising my sinful nature, causing me to obey by putting His Holy Spirit in me, and giving me a new heart.
![]()
I have just made pot number two, as I am at work and sharing my coffee-making skills with others.Yes, Magenta, I figured they would but thought it important to stated anyway. I poured myself a cup of strong coffee
in preparation for the coming onslaught.
You clearly didn't read what I posted and went directly to assumption.How does a dead man accept, submit, and yield? He is spiritually dead and must be made alive before he can do such things!
I have just made pot number two, as I am at work and sharing my coffee-making skills with others.
They do like the way I make the coffee so strong. LOL.
Doesn't matter because the BIBLE says their hearts were cut. So don't give me your man made reasoning because the Bible didn't lie. Their hearts were cut.A heart of stone cannot be cut. The heart must first be changed to one of flesh. That occurs only from/by the New Covenant and salvation, whereby, God gives a new heart of flesh. So, by being cut, it meant that salvation had already occurred for them. The repenting and acceptance of Jesus therefore came after the fact and is result, not before being cause.
[Eze 11:19,20 KJV]
19 And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh:
20 That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God.
[Eze 36:26,27 KJV]
26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do [them].
Yes, 2 possible reactions to the one condition.The Greek word in Acts 2 has the connotation of sorrow, whereas the Greek word in Acts 7 has the connotation of rage. Not the same word or result.
Doesn't matter because the BIBLE says their hearts were cut. So don't give me your man made reasoning because the Bible didn't lie. Their hearts were cut.
Right, but the natural man is always hostile in his mind towards God. So how is it that some don't act in accordance with the natural man's propensity when the gospel is preached? Why are some under conviction while others are not? What happened that caused some to be placed under conviction and respond in obedience? Who put them under conviction?Yes, 2 possible reactions to the one condition.
yes sir a covenant of grace as always existed sir and before the foundations of the world.For the record, I believe people have always been saved by grace through faith. And I believe the same Spirit that indwells us, indwelt them.
It is true to say that OT covenant Israel would have done works because they were also in a covenant of works. And obedience brought blessings and disobedience brought cursing. But the old covenant was meant to show the people their inability to remain faithful and was to point them to Christ. Before they covenant of Sinai, there was already a covenant of grace operating as early as Adam and Eve. We find it extended through Seth, Enoch, and Noah, before it becomes pronounced to Abraham. So there were 2 covenants operating at the same time. The covenant of works was always secondary and designed to preserve Israel and point to the need of something more. That something more was Christ and grace.
You don't agree with the reformed view of natural man (total depravity). Anything else?I agree about Natural Man.
But like the Book of Acts explains in Chapter 2 when Natural Man was cut to the heart they Repented and accepted Jesus. And we have Chapter 7 when Natural Man was cut to the heart they [shut off their ears from hearing] the Gospel preached and stoned Stephen to death. The fact Natural Man was nothing until they were cut to the heart shows us how true the other Verses about Natural Man are correct. But the fact when cut to the heart Natural Man could either accept Jesus or Reject Jesus and kill Stephen shows once Natural Man is awakened he has the free will or the ability to choose between accepting Jesus or rejecting Him.
That is one thing and there's others but interested in how you respond to the Biblical TRUTHS I just presented found in the Book of Acts.
A former pastor of mine was known to say to the congregation on occasion, "I'm paid to be good. You're good for nothing."But then maybe just maybe, some people say I don't need to be told to be good because you say so. I am good, you know what i mean sir.
They erase the natural man from Scriptures and rewrite 1 Cor 2:14. Or they simply do not know who the natural man is,Right, but the natural man is always hostile in his mind towards God. So how is it that some don't act in accordance with the natural man's propensity when the gospel is preached? Why are some under conviction while others are not? What happened that caused some to be placed under conviction and respond in obedience? Who put them under conviction?
Did he mean my debt had been payed.A former pastor of mine was known to say to the congregation on occasion, "I'm paid to be good. You're good for nothing."
It meant he was paid as a pastor... the congregation wasn't paid. It's a joke ;-)Did he mean my debt had been payed.
Or is he no longer your pastor for that reason ?
oops I'm so gullible lol.It meant he was paid as a pastor... the congregation wasn't paid. It's a joke ;-)
Why bother patching up an old garment?That's not an answer. You said you agree with some reformed doctrine. Which parts do you agree with?
I love to put a strong coffee in my car of a morning shut the doors then go back in the car five mins later m, the smell just blows my mind all the way to work.My family calls my coffee "black hole coffee" - it's so strong that light can't escape from it.
I love to put a strong coffee in my car of a morning shut the doors then go back in the car five mins later m, the smell just blows my mind all the way to work.
Right, but the natural man is always hostile in his mind towards God. So how is it that some don't act in accordance with the natural man's propensity when the gospel is preached? Why are some under conviction while others are not? What happened that caused some to be placed under conviction and respond in obedience? Who put them under conviction?