Even demons know that!
Demons are spirits and know spiritual things that man naturally does not.
Even demons know that!
That's pretty stupid, equivalent to saying unbelievers believe religious/theological premises.Yes is true, some do care to know thankfully.
To persuade the "reformed crew" on the correct soteriology seems futile and wasted effort,
however to defend the correct biblical soteriology is important always, imho.
If we did not stand against their erroneous system, the impact of the true Gospel would be diminished over time and people would all be inert, waiting to be called out of the grave like Derek Webb.
everything.3 And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.
So Moses was curious.
What does that have to do with the fact that God used the burning bush to draw him near?
non issue ... all agree that the glory goes to God ...BillyBob said:How does that give Moses credit for what took place?
exactly ... and Ex 3:4 says when the LORD saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him ... so it was not until Moses turned to the Lord that God spoke.BillyBob said:If I saw a bush burning without being destroyed, I would be curious as well!
he's been told many, many times ...@Rufus banged out one verse of Exodus 4......and promptly fell flat on his face.
Somebody tell him that when the Bible says that God hardens a heart, it is a judgement of WALKING/TURNING AWAY and WITHHOLDING grace, truth and light.
It is reactionary.......for the most part.
how many times has it been iterated and reiterated that it is God Who makes the first move ...cv5 said:The Bible indicates that both God and men are capable of doing it. But when God does it it is righteous. When we do it.....not so much
if the only thing that is taught from the pulpit is "religious/theological premises", that is what is believed in the congregation ...That's pretty stupid, equivalent to saying unbelievers believe religious/theological premises.
if the only thing that is taught from the pulpit is "religious/theological premises", that is what is believed in the congregation ...
have you ever considered the woes the Lord Jesus Christ pronounced against the scribes and pharisees ? ... all the times the Lord Jesus Christ pointed out their failure ... the fact that they taught the doctrines of men ?
have you ever considered that the believer is to behave as the Bereans ?
Acts 17:11 KJV - 11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
It amazes me that the Bible is very specific about Moshe or Moses saying, I WILL TURN AND LOOK and we still have deniers trying to claim this is not a free will act.
In every definition of the terms I WILL has [(always and will never change)] indicate a SELF chosen made ACT that only the person saying I WILL can decide and do.
No one is saying Moses didn't make a choice. We all make choices. The question is whether the will is free to make choices or is impinged upon by the nature of the individual. In other words, does nature play a role in the choices we make? And if so, is the will actually free?It amazes me that the Bible is very specific about Moshe or Moses saying, I WILL TURN AND LOOK and we still have deniers trying to claim this is not a free will act.
In every definition of the terms I WILL has [(always and will never change)] indicate a SELF chosen made ACT that only the person saying I WILL can decide and do.
Which goes to show you. God does not have to make a person to be spiritual to get saved.
That is why the Gospel is not what 1 Corinthians 2:14 is referring to.
1 Corinthians 2:14 speaks of the doctrines that a regenerate is to learn to grow spiritually with.
But the person without the Spirit does not receive what comes from God’s Spirit, because
it is foolishness to him; he is not able to understand it, since it is evaluated spiritually.
.
No one is saying Moses didn't make a choice. We all make choices. The question is whether the will is free to make choices or is impinged upon by the nature of the individual. In other words, does nature play a role in the choices we make? And if so, is the will actually free?
Who the hell cares?
What are you proving?
Without this pet doctrine of yours, you would have nothing to talk about!
It keeps others locked in the house unable to go out and explore the neighborhood.
Just drop it!
So... You got your perspective.
We think it's idiocy.
And, you think you are too wise for us.
That's been firmly established.
There you have it.
Give me a break! Sure Moses turned to look. Who would not have? But, your thoughts are so shallow concerning the reason for him taking notice.It amazes me that the Bible is very specific about Moshe or Moses saying, I WILL TURN AND LOOK and we still have deniers trying to claim this is not a free will act.
In every definition of the terms I WILL has [(always and will never change)] indicate a SELF chosen made ACT that only the person saying I WILL can decide and do.
Predisposition!No one is saying Moses didn't make a choice. We all make choices. The question is whether the will is free to make choices or is impinged upon by the nature of the individual. In other words, does nature play a role in the choices we make? And if so, is the will actually free?
You clearly have never lived with tumbleweed. It dries up and will burst into fire spontaneously. So seeing a bush on fire without being on fire would be something spectacular. Just knowing that you know so little about such things reveals why you are easily manipulated by your Doctrines.Give me a break! Sure Moses turned to look. Who would not have? But, your thoughts are so shallow concerning the reason for him taking notice.
What was so special about this bush? Oh, my gosh, it was on fire! How did that happen?
So Moses said I WILL, which caused him to make a free-will decision to point his feet in the direction of the bush. He also decided what sandals to wear that day! Again, a free-will choice.
Your theology seems to go nuts every time it is mentioned that God is the reason why men are drawn to Him. I guess that is because it would speak against your free-will belief.
Anytime you place a requirement that man must do anything to become saved – you have just proclaimed that salvation is not by grace, it is not a gift, I earned it!
There you go making assumptions again!You clearly have never lived with tumbleweed.
Looks like someone got up on the wrong side of the bed today. If an individual has no patience, gentleness, or self control, why would anyone think said individual was mature in the faith and value what they say? There are plenty of people who can espouse doctrine. It seems there are few who actually manifest it.Who the hell cares?
What are you proving?
Without this pet doctrine of yours, you would have nothing to talk about!
It keeps others locked in the house unable to go out and explore the neighborhood.
Just drop it!
So... You got your perspective.
We think it's idiocy.
And, you think you are too wise for us.
That's been firmly established.
There you have it.
If this were the only passage of scripture on the subject, I would agree with you. However, there is ample scripture that teaches that the will is not free, but impacted in a variety of ways.Predisposition!
Interesting concept and idealism to connect the act of free will to the science of natural instinct.
In other words, Moses chooses to LOOK but many different people would ignore or not understand that the Bush was not really burning.
One could say because of the information we know about Moshe being trained to become a Pharaoh he had the best teachers, best education, best environment to succeed that when it came time for God to use him God used the training of Moshe [a Thinker seeing a bush on fire but not actually burning up] to encapsulate him by capturing Moshe's intellect and adaptive training\instincts.
Of course people in that region have seen bushes dry up and burst into fire on a daily basis. So when a bush appears to be burning but never implodes into a flaming ball of fire could be easily recognized as something unusual and would cause a similar reaction we read like that of Moshe.
Nevertheless, the Bible simply states that Moshe chose to Look and it doesn't go into great detail about it. That leaves a lot of speculation to discuss but all we really know is that Moshe chose to Look because the Bible tells us so.
No one is saying Moses didn't make a choice. We all make choices. The question is whether the will is free to make choices or is impinged upon by the nature of the individual. In other words, does nature play a role in the choices we make? And if so, is the will actually free?