Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Luke4-18-19s.png

Luke 4 v 18-19 The Spirit of the Lord is on Me, because He has anointed Me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to release the oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
Pulling verses out of context is basically superficial proof texting and those verses especially require context.
There are many times when this several chapters are required to grasp intent.
But as we both know, the entire Bible must be integrated one way or the other.

Case in point: The entire Bible relates to Genesis ch 3 and Genesis ch 15.
And if it doesn't then you are wrong in your interpretation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
The point is the order.
Believe first >>> Regeneration second

You know the logical, coherent, moral order Jesus taught.
He's not talking about being made alive, but possessing eternal life. There's a difference between regeneration and eternal life.
 
Many that teach this correct order.
It didn't say believe and live. It said believe and be saved. You misrepresented the verse. Every other verse you gave was talking about life in Christ. That isn't regeneration, but eternal life.
 
There are many times when this several chapters are required to grasp intent.
But as we both know, the entire Bible must be integrated one way or the other.

Case in point: The entire Bible relates to Genesis ch 3 and Genesis ch 15.
And if it doesn't then you are wrong in your interpretation.
Every verse relates to Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jordon
For the record, I believe people have always been saved by grace through faith. And I believe the same Spirit that indwells us, indwelt them.
It is true to say that OT covenant Israel would have done works because they were also in a covenant of works. And obedience brought blessings and disobedience brought cursing. But the old covenant was meant to show the people their inability to remain faithful and was to point them to Christ. Before they covenant of Sinai, there was already a covenant of grace operating as early as Adam and Eve. We find it extended through Seth, Enoch, and Noah, before it becomes pronounced to Abraham. So there were 2 covenants operating at the same time. The covenant of works was always secondary and designed to preserve Israel and point to the need of something more. That something more was Christ and grace.
You know cam im still wondering why you disagreed with most of what I said.

I mainly talked about the unsaved.

I did make a brief mention that some may have been saved in the old t when I said some may have excelled in the examination..

But to what number I do not know. Also I believe that through Grace this occured, and through excelling of the examination of the heart...


I believe there is ot saints.

But mainly i was expressing the condition of the fallen man.

But obviously the heart which is excelling in the examination is obviously going to treated better and even experience Gods grace better. Even in the ot sir

As for the covenant of works sir are you refering to the mosaic covenant ?

Is it you feel there is only a covenant of grace that exists today.

That would be so for the saved sir...

But the unsaved are judged by the law. Would they not still be bound to the mosaic covenant. ?


But also the Jewish people who are promised are also still under the abrahamic covenant. And they will inherit sir


Which as I've stated sir as to what number have excelled in that covenant I do not know sir
 
1Cor2:14

@Cameron143 was recently loading logic about the natural man, creating his own Premise which forced a Conclusion and challenging another re: the logic. @HeIsHere called him on it. It's easy to create a Premise that forces a Conclusion. The answer to that challenge was simply to replace the Premise with another one that we see FROM the Bible.

In 1Cor2:14 the word being translated as "natural man" is "psuchikos". Here's the basic definition from the BDAG Lexicon:

pertains to the life of the natural world and whatever belongs to it, in contrast to the realm of experience whose central characteristic is pneuma (spirit), natural, unspiritual, worldly​
Honestly, I think this whole category of words could use more work. A more typical translation might be "soulish" but even then, this is only somewhat correct. If we look at references like this, we can see that the word is more pointedly speaking of "breath". If you've never done the study, it's very difficult IMO to fully understand what constitutes a man and there is extensive overlap between spirit and soul for example.

In physics there is much talk about "entanglement". There seems to be more and more theoretical discussion about the concept of man being an entanglement between the physical and non-physical - the brain and the soul - the brain and the spirit and the body.

When it comes to psuchikos from psuchē, in my experience it's best just to see if and how God may define or explain the word in Scripture. I think He does the most with it in Jude. Under the beginning assumption that Jude and Paul may think similarly about the word, I'm starting where we seem to get the most information. Then I'll track the word and see what else we're told about it elsewhere. In the end I'd like to know more precisely what we're dealing with in 1Cor2:14 re: the psuchikos man - for now the soulish man:

Jude’s Description of the ψυχικοί (psuchikoi - plural of psuchikos - soulish men – v.19)
  1. Ungodly people (asebeis) – v. 4, 15, 18
    1. Irreverent toward God, lacking devotion.
  2. Pervert the grace of God into sensuality – v. 4
    1. Twist grace into a license for immorality.
  3. Deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ – v. 4
    1. Refuse Christ’s authority.
  4. Cause divisions (apodiorizontes) – v. 19
    1. Set up boundaries, fragment the community.
  5. Do not have the Spirit – v. 19
    1. Clear statement: Spirit-less.
  6. Grumblers (goggustai) – v. 16
    1. Habitual complainers against God or others.
  7. Fault-finders / malcontents (mempsimoiroi) – v. 16
    1. Dissatisfied, blaming their lot.
  8. Walk according to their lusts – v. 16, 18
    1. Conduct ruled by desires, not by God.
  9. Speak arrogantly – v. 16
    1. Use inflated words of pride.
  10. Flatter others for the sake of advantage – v. 16
    1. Manipulate through praise to gain benefit.
  11. Mockers (empaiktai) – v. 18
    1. Scoff at God and His truth.
  12. Follow the way of Cain – v. 11
    1. Like Cain, showing hatred and unbelief.
  13. Rush for profit into Balaam’s error – v. 11
    1. Driven by greed, like Balaam.
  14. Destroyed in Korah’s rebellion – v. 11
    1. Share in Korah’s arrogant rejection of God’s appointed leaders.
  15. Examples of judgment given in history (applied to them) – v. 5–7
    1. Israel’s unbelief, angels who left their domain, Sodom’s immorality.
  16. Hidden reefs in your love-feasts – v. 12
    1. Dangerous presences within the fellowship, unseen threats.
  17. Shepherds who feed only themselves – v. 12
    1. Self-serving leaders.
  18. Clouds without water – v. 12
    1. Empty, promising refreshment but giving none.
  19. Autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, uprooted – v. 12
    1. Barren, lifeless, and judged.
  20. Wild waves of the sea – v. 13
    1. Chaotic, foaming up their shame.
  21. Wandering stars – v. 13
    1. Misleading lights, destined for darkness.
  22. For whom the blackest darkness has been reserved forever – v. 13
    1. Their final destiny: eternal judgment.
I will tell you that I do have an inclination from much personal study in the Word mainly in the Greek, that #1, 3, 5 tell us the majority of the issue. I'll go through other references to psuchikos as I have time.
 
1Cor2:14 continued re: the psuchikos-soulish man

James3:15 also speaks of soulishness. He uses the adjective form of the word "psuchikē" which is applies to "wisdom" thereby describing a form of wisdom as soulish - soulish wisdom. So, from James3:15-18 we learn this about being psuchikos-soulish. The first 3 points are descriptions James provides. Points 4-5 are manifestations of soulish wisdom and point 6 is what it lacks in contrast to wisdom from above - from God.

James 3:15 – Description of ψυχική (psuchikē - soulish) Wisdom:
  1. Wisdom not from above – v. 15
    • Soulish wisdom does not originate from God; it is not divine in source.
  2. Earthly wisdom (epigeios) – v. 15
    • Soulish wisdom focuses on worldly, human concerns; its perspective is bound to the earth.
  3. Demonic / devil-like wisdom (daimoniōdēs) – v. 15
    • Soulish wisdom is influenced by demonic powers; it opposes God’s ways and purposes.
  4. Produces disorder and every evil practice – v. 16
    • Soulish wisdom leads to strife, envy, selfish ambition, and harmful actions in community life.
  5. Revealed in speech and conduct – v. 1–12
    • Soulish wisdom manifests in boasting, discord, and uncontrolled speech, contrasting with the fruit of wisdom from above.
  6. Lacks peaceable, gentle, and righteous fruit – v. 17–18
    • Soulish wisdom does not produce the qualities of wisdom from above, which are peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits (results), impartial, and sincere; it does not lead to righteousness and peace among people.
 
Only in your own mind.
In light of the last couple of immensely edifying posts, to that I would say have a blessed day.

  1. Lacks peaceable, gentle, and righteous fruit – v. 17–18
    • Soulish wisdom does not produce the qualities of wisdom from above, which are peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits (results), impartial, and sincere; it does not lead to righteousness and peace among people.
  2. Speak arrogantly – v. 16
    1. Use inflated words of pride.
 
In light of the last couple of immensely edifying posts, to that I would say have a blessed day.

  1. Lacks peaceable, gentle, and righteous fruit – v. 17–18
    • Soulish wisdom does not produce the qualities of wisdom from above, which are peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits (results), impartial, and sincere; it does not lead to righteousness and peace among people.
  2. Speak arrogantly – v. 16
    1. Use inflated words of pride.

Are you noticing how we all retain some of this soulishness? It's quite the battle this human condition. I'm thankful for the human volition that can choose to become something different by the Grace, Word, Spirit of God.
 
What you describe is a partial spiritual birth, enough to understand enough to make a decision. Decide yes, and the birth is fully completed. Decide no, and you are spiritually partial-birth aborted and go back to being spiritually dead. That's not scriptural, and certainly isn't the reformed view.

So going back to where this particular discussion started, no, you don't agree with "some" reformed doctrine.
I am merely stating my position is the fact one can choose even as you have explained. That is my belief simply that at some point of what God wants to do we can choose to allow it or shut our ears.
 
You're still not paying attention. I know why those who stopped their ears did so. They were natural men. They always stop their ears and suppress the truth.

Now let's talk about those who respond positively. What changed. If the natural man always responds negatively, what happened that someone would respond positively?
They [Acts 7 people] were those who lived their lives abiding by the LAW and under every circumstance before Jesus they were saved.

To the Acts 2 people:
For one they witnessed the 120 and what was happening to them. Even Paul writes in Corinthians about how Speaking in Tongues is for the unbeilever and that's absolute proof of what he said.

Then being full of the Holy Ghost Peter preached the Gospel + made it personal to them like Stephen did but they responded positively. I wonder had Stephen Spoke in Tongues like the other 3,000 witnessed would have changed some reactions since we know what the 3,000 witnessed and Paul explains it's for the purpose of the non believers?

But ultimately the 3,000 did fulfill the Verse written by Paul about hearing the Gospel brings Faith.
 
But the do the tenets of the Reformed Tradition relate to Genesis 3 and Genesis 15?
Because most of them do not. On the contrary, they stand opposed.
Every reformed tenet magnifies Christ and His work of salvation.
 
1Cor2:14

@Cameron143 was recently loading logic about the natural man, creating his own Premise which forced a Conclusion and challenging another re: the logic. @HeIsHere called him on it. It's easy to create a Premise that forces a Conclusion. The answer to that challenge was simply to replace the Premise with another one that we see FROM the Bible.

In 1Cor2:14 the word being translated as "natural man" is "psuchikos". Here's the basic definition from the BDAG Lexicon:

pertains to the life of the natural world and whatever belongs to it, in contrast to the realm of experience whose central characteristic is pneuma (spirit), natural, unspiritual, worldly​
Honestly, I think this whole category of words could use more work. A more typical translation might be "soulish" but even then, this is only somewhat correct. If we look at references like this, we can see that the word is more pointedly speaking of "breath". If you've never done the study, it's very difficult IMO to fully understand what constitutes a man and there is extensive overlap between spirit and soul for example.

In physics there is much talk about "entanglement". There seems to be more and more theoretical discussion about the concept of man being an entanglement between the physical and non-physical - the brain and the soul - the brain and the spirit and the body.

When it comes to psuchikos from psuchē, in my experience it's best just to see if and how God may define or explain the word in Scripture. I think He does the most with it in Jude. Under the beginning assumption that Jude and Paul may think similarly about the word, I'm starting where we seem to get the most information. Then I'll track the word and see what else we're told about it elsewhere. In the end I'd like to know more precisely what we're dealing with in 1Cor2:14 re: the psuchikos man - for now the soulish man:

Jude’s Description of the ψυχικοί (psuchikoi - plural of psuchikos - soulish men – v.19)
  1. Ungodly people (asebeis) – v. 4, 15, 18
    1. Irreverent toward God, lacking devotion.
  2. Pervert the grace of God into sensuality – v. 4
    1. Twist grace into a license for immorality.
  3. Deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ – v. 4
    1. Refuse Christ’s authority.
  4. Cause divisions (apodiorizontes) – v. 19
    1. Set up boundaries, fragment the community.
  5. Do not have the Spirit – v. 19
    1. Clear statement: Spirit-less.
  6. Grumblers (goggustai) – v. 16
    1. Habitual complainers against God or others.
  7. Fault-finders / malcontents (mempsimoiroi) – v. 16
    1. Dissatisfied, blaming their lot.
  8. Walk according to their lusts – v. 16, 18
    1. Conduct ruled by desires, not by God.
  9. Speak arrogantly – v. 16
    1. Use inflated words of pride.
  10. Flatter others for the sake of advantage – v. 16
    1. Manipulate through praise to gain benefit.
  11. Mockers (empaiktai) – v. 18
    1. Scoff at God and His truth.
  12. Follow the way of Cain – v. 11
    1. Like Cain, showing hatred and unbelief.
  13. Rush for profit into Balaam’s error – v. 11
    1. Driven by greed, like Balaam.
  14. Destroyed in Korah’s rebellion – v. 11
    1. Share in Korah’s arrogant rejection of God’s appointed leaders.
  15. Examples of judgment given in history (applied to them) – v. 5–7
    1. Israel’s unbelief, angels who left their domain, Sodom’s immorality.
  16. Hidden reefs in your love-feasts – v. 12
    1. Dangerous presences within the fellowship, unseen threats.
  17. Shepherds who feed only themselves – v. 12
    1. Self-serving leaders.
  18. Clouds without water – v. 12
    1. Empty, promising refreshment but giving none.
  19. Autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, uprooted – v. 12
    1. Barren, lifeless, and judged.
  20. Wild waves of the sea – v. 13
    1. Chaotic, foaming up their shame.
  21. Wandering stars – v. 13
    1. Misleading lights, destined for darkness.
  22. For whom the blackest darkness has been reserved forever – v. 13
    1. Their final destiny: eternal judgment.
I will tell you that I do have an inclination from much personal study in the Word mainly in the Greek, that #1, 3, 5 tell us the majority of the issue. I'll go through other references to psuchikos as I have time.
Simply false. Every verse she shared was dealing with eternal life, and not regeneration. If she was dealing with regeneration, she would have chosen verses that spoke of quickening and being made alive. Instead, she chose verses that spoke of experiencing the benefits of belief. She also changed the wording of at least 1 verse to say something other than it said.
 
In light of the last couple of immensely edifying posts, to that I would say have a blessed day.

  1. Lacks peaceable, gentle, and righteous fruit – v. 17–18
    • Soulish wisdom does not produce the qualities of wisdom from above, which are peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits (results), impartial, and sincere; it does not lead to righteousness and peace among people.
  2. Speak arrogantly – v. 16
    1. Use inflated words of pride.
...
Nighttwister said: "If you won, as you have stated so many times, why are you still here?"
...
cv5 said: To revel in the spoils of war? Admittedly, there are slim pickings among your crew
It would seem that the above definitely applies to you.
 
I am merely stating my position is the fact one can choose even as you have explained. That is my belief simply that at some point of what God wants to do we can choose to allow it or shut our ears.
So we can dispense with the notion that you agree with "some" of reformed doctrine. That was my only point to this particular discussion. Have a nice weekend.