Does Bible commentary not fall under the heading of theology?
It can but that's not what I use Adam and Clarke for
Does Bible commentary not fall under the heading of theology?
Premillennialism believe Zechariah 8:23, Amos 9:15, and Jeremiah 32:37-44 have not been fulfilled.
I will put the fear of me in their hearts, that they may not turn from me.
I wonder what free willers make of that verse.
Do they say, oh, God turned me into a puppet?
Do they scream about how unfair He is to act unilaterally to cause people to obey?
It does make me wonder...
Premillennialism believe Zechariah 8:23, Amos 9:15, and Jeremiah 32:37-44 have not been fulfilled.
The fear of the Lord is described as a "fountain of life" that turns people away from death.He puts the spirit of the fear of God into our hearts that warns us there is a bad consequence for doing works of the flesh. After that it's our choice what they do.
Ok. So...give me an outline of the book of Revelation and we'll see.Can't explain? Who can't explain?
I'm a premillennialist and I CAN "explain" all of those prophecies and concatenate them with the book of revelation accurately without breaking a sweat.
You see little buddy, it is YOU that "can't explain" those prophecies or the book of revelation. You can't. Not me can't not they can't.....YOU can't.
It takes decades of sustained effort to get there. And as you well know, family, work, other distractions can impede progress.I admire your confidence in your belief. I hope I can be as confident in my understanding of them some day.
Trolls just do what they do friend, enlightening, mutually beneficial spiritual discussion, isn't what floats their boat. They want to control discussion, impose their interpretation of Scripture etc, i do wonder if some of them are genuine Christians.I know it's not pleasant sometimes m, but what can we do when in where disagreement
There are some people who have been Relentless here as in having zero reasoning to stop assigning everything we discuss to ideologies of the wrong kind. Despite asking them nicely to stop on several occasions, and explaining why they shouldn't, responding in kindness, rather than Sooner or later m when confronted with this no end, you end up saying something you wish you didn't have to.
Sending thousands of posts to then only have some new member come along and it's back to square 1 again, and people in this thread are being very tolerant in this thread towards that as well as being tolerant of unnecessary comments before calling it out for what it is.
Such as people behaving incredibly unfair, and acting like trolls that like to bully along with acting like hypocrites m
How much should you take before you call it out for what it is. Because you tried reasoning even humoring, as well showing them clearly how the will of man lives in the flesh m,.. and how the lords will is above all.![]()
Are you unaware of all the blather about how God acting unilaterally makes us puppets, and/or Him a monster?He puts the spirit of the fear of God into our hearts that warns us there is a bad consequence for doing works of the flesh. After that it's our choice what they do.
impose their interpretation of Scripture etc, i
And there is only one narrow path and one gate and one way to enter, a Christian should always support, teach and preach the correct, accurate and authentic Gospel, it is not open to interpretation at all.
Of course there's only one actual interpretation, but people often have different interpretations of particular scriptures. Hence why there are the *thou-shalt-nots* you hang out with and the more *rejoice in the Lord* types like me.And there is only one narrow path and one gate and one way to enter, a Christian should always support, teach and preach the correct, accurate and authentic Gospel, it is not open to interpretation at all.
Precious friend, if you are talking to / trying to (in love) encourage different people, that isI know it's not pleasant sometimes m, but what can we do when in where disagreement
Do what?
Of course there's only one actual interpretation, but people often have different interpretations of particular scriptures. Hence why there are the *thou-shalt-nots* you hang out with and the more *rejoice in the Lord* types like me.
i have read some interesting comments from you about other things, however, think you're pretty dogmatic spiritually. Well, at least on this thread, s'pose we'll find out whether one or both of us got it right in the nearish future.
How many Brides does he have?I don't believe it only refers to the church age; simply revealed during the church age. This is why Christ revealed the truth concerning Abraham that Abraham saw His day and rejoiced. It is also why Job recognized God as his redeemer. While they understood less than we do today, they had to be in Christ in order for Christ to be their mediator. Otherwise, they remained in Adam. There is no third option.
Of course there is a distinction between believing gentiles and unbelieving Jews.
And of course, Jews that come to believe AFTER THE RAPTURE are not part of the Church per se.
Church is one and done....starts at Pentecost ends at the rapture.
Those who believe post-rapture are categorized in different classes of saints.
Truth and dogmatism are two different things.
It is good to be dogmatic with truth and not good to be dogmatic with error.
There is one objective, consistent teaching in scripture about spiritual salvation and how it is received.