It's okay to disagree. But I believe the scriptures speak for themselves.
Yes absolutely they do. That is why I wonder where you got the idea that curses are no longer in effect if you are a believer. Scripture does not back that up. I included the passage from Romans 8 and you ignore it. In fact, you say you don't know why I posted it even though it is 100% attuned to your op. Those verses illustrate the fact that ALL of creation is waiting for redemption; it's not just about the human creation. How can you read that, let alone study it, and conclude that after the flood there were no more curses in effect from the garden?
I didn't ignore, I refuted your interpretation.
Well no you did not. Ignoring scripture I posted is not refuting. You come back with just more of the same. You do not address the scriptures I posted.
Brush off? Like what? To be honest I'm not even sure what you are referring to. What is unbiblical? That Christ became the curse? That the origin of curses are both God and demonic or only God? What exactly are you not understanding? I know you had an issue with land curse but have yet to address Genesis 8. Instead you have reverted to red herrings, strawmen, and ad hominems. But I'm glad you find humor in the Bible being read in it's totality.![]()
It sounds like you are trying to divert from what I actually said. I explained with detail why your post is not biblical and you just brush it off. I do not have issues with scripture as you are trying to say. I don't even have an issue with the fact you try to twist what I said. I do have concerns with the fact you do not reply to the FACTUAL acount of the actual story of Balaam. I addressed Genesis 8 several times. Reading the Bible does not make you a scholar or correct. There is no humor there since you chose to point out the fact you read the entire thing as though you now have authority over everyone else here that disagrees with your op.
In one part yes, the goal is to teach. I have discussed the last 19 posts. So again not sure what you mean. Just as Romans 8. You just posted it with no understanding of why you posted it. What was the reason or point?
That is not true. Anyone can read what I said about it. What do you hope to achieve by saying something about what I wrote that is not true? I can never understand why people think they can get away with pretending another person did not say what in fact they did say, and in some detail.
Oh was this the point? You do understand that the OP was about our spiritual nature right? The condition of the soul?
Your op:
Can we experience curses today? The op was about curses. You can talk about the other topics in another thread if you like.
I believe I understand the confusion now. We are having a categorical error. The OP was describing what Christ has done in us, not what we must deal with around us. Obviously the things and people still affected by the curse, will be around us.
This place isn't even considered home as a child of God, we are passing through as ambassadors or sojourners.
This is simply a contrived distraction. Not working though.
just fine? Lol okay. Literally my post ended about needing Christ to be protected.
Your op is short on facts as found in scripture.
Another strawman. I never said this
Perhaps you could try explaining why putting on the armor as described in Ephesians is a strawman?