Isaiah 55:6-7,6 Seek יהוה while He is to be found, call on Him while He is near."7 Let the wrong forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts. Let him return to יהוה, who has compassion on him, and to our Mighty One, for He pardons much."
Please put the scriptural verse not just a, b or c. Say whatever you want scripture is clearly addressing the meaning of Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. I am only quoting scripture. So, your "HAHAHAHA" is not TOWARD ME but TOWARD THE WORD. It is clear the word is addressing a possible thing, or else Christ would not have said it. You act like I am saying this OP person has done such a thing. Again only giving the CORRECT meaning of the verses in question and have even done so with St. Peter.HAHAHAH the more you speak the more you prove you don't know much....
Judas was never saved
a. Devil from the BEGINNING
b. Thief holding the bag
c. SON of PERDITION
Go study and then come flap!
No one is rejecting (IRREVOCABLE) just the false limited application of the verse posted. The context of the verse is more clearly understood by the content of the the rest which precedes it and follows. Context is important. For instance, if the word is- you shot someone and everyone based the verdict solely on that information, you are convicted. But if the full context is : While in a tree stand hunting, you fell out of the tree and shot another hunter near by when your gun went off as you hit the ground, then the full context of the story is known.AND.....IRREVOCABLE..........of course they reject this word....it does not fit their weak god and the loseable salvation that he peddles....<---RELIGION'S god that is
Thankyou so much for your comment,
Yes I read it and was worried what it means..
Ie, can I lose my salvation?”
It troubled me, I was raised in a believing home but due to my rebellion I turned away and lived such a sinful life. I was worried this might have meant me.
Please put the scriptural verse not just a, b or c. Say whatever you want scripture is clearly addressing the meaning of Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. I am only quoting scripture. So, your "HAHAHAHA" is not TOWARD ME but TOWARD THE WORD. It is clear the word is addressing a possible thing, or else Christ would not have said it. You act like I am saying this OP person has done such a thing. Again only giving the CORRECT meaning of the verses in question and have even done so with St. Peter.
It is very simple- does Christ say that blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is the ONLY sin which will not be forgiven? And does not Hebrews and St. Peter explain what that is? Not sure what your beef is with the WORD.
Amen! John 17:12 - While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled. John 18:9 - that the saying might be fulfilled which He spoke, "Of those whom You gave Me I have lost none." Jesus did not lose Judas. He was already lost. Judas was an unbelieving, unclean devil who betrayed Jesus (John 6:64-71; 13:10-11).
Syllogism
1. All given by the Father to Jesus are kept.
2. Judas was not kept.
3. Judas was not given to Jesus by the Father
Or, this way.
1. None of those given to Jesus by the Father will be lost by Jesus.
2. Judas is lost.
3. Judas was not given to Jesus by the Father.
So does this mean for example me as a child I was brought up in a believing home accepted Christ but in my teens I fell into rebellion and lived sinful, I still believed in Christ but was not walking with Him.
Does this still mean I cannot be saved?
Now I Feel I am truly trying to walk with Him, I read and try to understand the Bible. I do feel like I have changed, I am very regretful and repent and cry for all the sins of my past... I even felt called to be baptized.
Am I what the author of Hebrews is talking about?
No doubt, and one who will not believe there are consequences to rejecting their restoration is in disbelief. Scripture is still clear , it is impossible to restore someone AGAIN when they reject their restoration. That is the discussion. You state the OBVIOUS. This is about less obvious and more complicated matters of the faith. You stick with the easy and let the enlightened address the more complicated and don't hurt yourself. When in first grade how can you understand 12th. It's that simple. I am right because the scripture is.Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is to DENY the work of Christ as being from GOD...<---this is a state of UNBELIEF....one who WILL NOT BELIEVE cannot be forgiven........THAT is Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.....
No one is rejecting (IRREVOCABLE) just the false limited application of the verse posted. The context of the verse is more clearly understood by the content of the the rest which precedes it and follows. Context is important. For instance, if the word is- you shot someone and everyone based the verdict solely on that information, you are convicted. But if the full context is : While in a tree stand hunting, you fell out of the tree and shot another hunter near by when your gun went off as you hit the ground, then the full context of the story is known.
Say what you want, the full context of any story or in this case The Letter of Romans is important to making points and verdicts. Again the Word is clear concerning Hebrews, if one rejects his or her restoration, it is IMPOSSIBLE to be restored again. Pretty clear. The apostles do not speak in fairy tale like terms of impossibilities but in reality of real possibilities and concerns. If it is not possible to reject your Restoration then there would be no need to write and speak about it . There would be no need to warn Christians about the Mark of the Beast then either, for then it would not matter if you receive it. After all according to you there is no such thing as Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. Well, you can continue in your fairy tale, I'll put my faith in what the Word clearly says, and for sure, I will not reject my Restoration, for NO ONE or anything will separate me from the love within MY LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST (Yeshua Hamashiach), not even you with your false doctrine touted!
No doubt, and one who will not believe there are consequences to rejecting their restoration is in disbelief. Scripture is still clear , it is impossible to restore someone AGAIN when they reject their restoration. That is the discussion. You state the OBVIOUS. This is about less obvious and more complicated matters of the faith. You stick with the easy and let the enlightened address the more complicated and don't hurt yourself. When in first grade how can you understand 12th. It's that simple. I am right because the scripture is.
Do not buy what Firstlovedbyhim is selling.....Salvation is a one off event with present continuing results....Perfect TENSE GREEK verbs tied to salvation set for the following truth....
a. Was saved when we believed
b. Are saved right now
c. Continuing to be saved into the future
God's deals with us as children/sheep not goats....he whips us, chastens us, may take rewards from us, may even take our physical life and yet the SPIRIT remains born of INCORRUPTABLE SEED and the gift of life is IRREVOCABLE.....and eternal means exactly that....if salvation was temporal and could be lost the word ETERNAL and or EVERLASTING would not have been used.......
No offence, you can save the rhetoric..the bible does not teach a loseable salvation....I do not just whip beliefs out of the air and way too many scriptures, context, verb tense etc. must be rejected, denied, tossed out, embellished, changed and or twisted to teach or believe in a salvation that can be lost.......and the above is ridiculous the delusion is only sent to those who will not receive the love of the truth.....your logic is flawed and it is obvious that you, like many workers for and salvation losers, are not open to actual biblical truths and principles that prove your error.....so.....let us just cut to the chase....ignore me and I will ignore you......simple solution!
Wrong again.....those saved who wander are chastened, lose reward, possibly lose their physical life....NO where does it indicate they lose their salvation....and the bolded is ignorant and rather immature/mouthy/childish...how old are you 14?
You do not even know Greek, you can not even understand English. She does have to buy what I am saying, because I am quoting the Word. Her OP is the word and it is clear. My question to you is, why would you be deterring someone from being aware of the obvious concerning rejecting their restoration? Why would you be trying to blind her to the obvious in Hebrews and St. Peter? Have you rejected your restoration? And again scripture please not just your interpretation and stating "Perfect Tense Greek" and too- not show that . As I said , you do not even have a handle on English.
You do not even know Greek, you can not even understand English. She does have to buy what I am saying, because I am quoting the Word. Her OP is the word and it is clear. My question to you is, why would you be deterring someone from being aware of the obvious concerning rejecting their restoration? Why would you be trying to blind her to the obvious in Hebrews and St. Peter? Have you rejected your restoration? And again scripture please not just your interpretation and stating "Perfect Tense Greek" and too- not show that . As I said , you do not even have a handle on English.
You seem to like the word restoration which is fine, yet there is more to being a born again believer than being restored to a relationship with God if that is how you are using it.
We are also justified by God, no man or woman can undo the justification declared by God by their own volition.
NONE OF THIS THAT EITHER OF YOU PUT CHANGES THE MEANING OF HEBREWS.