Bernieeeeee

[Nuns_n_roses]

Sounds like you've already had some.

Just kidding! Just kidding! Don't be mad. I appreciate what you share here.

You're missing out LOL

 

[wisebeardman]

I'm saying I don't understand how you connected pedophilia and socialism... not those two sentences...

I don't see why anyone would defend a underdog just because it is an underdog. You said you will always defend the underdog in debate. thus by your own words, if this topic was about pedophilia by your own admission you would have to defend the for viewpoint.

see how bad it is just to blindly defend a view just because it is a underdog. it is not good.

 

[wisebeardman]

Remember folks, if you roll around in poop (side with evil) you will smell like poop.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

I don't see why anyone would defend a underdog just because it is an underdog. You said you will always defend the underdog in debate. thus by your own words, if this topic was about pedophilia by your own admission you would have to defend the for viewpoint.

see how bad it is just to blindly defend a view just because it is a underdog. it is not good.

I defend underdogs because they are who a group is picking on. For example, I dislike Trump, but I would talk about his positive points if someone was defaming him or saying untrue things.

People hate Joel Osteen, but I have defended him too, because he has never said anything mean to anyone that I've heard, and nobody is perfect.

If someone says, "Oh that pedophile has molested thousands!" when they had molested one, I wouldn't agree with it but I would correct them by saying it wasn't true. In some cases, people mistake pointing out untrue statements as defending or supporting something.

Please read my post on WHY I defended Sanders on this page. It's on page 7...

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

Remember folks, if you roll around in poop (side with evil) you will smell like poop.

I do not think that is very Christian of you sir, but I respect your right to freedom of speech.

 

[wisebeardman]

I do not think that is very Christian of you sir, but I respect your right to freedom of speech.

sorry, but if someone decides they are going to support evil actions/policy. they have sided with evil, thus they are evil

 

[wisebeardman]

I defend underdogs because they are who a group is picking on. For example, I dislike Trump, but I would talk about his positive points if someone was defaming him or saying untrue things.

People hate Joel Osteen, but I have defended him too, because he has never said anything mean to anyone that I've heard, and nobody is perfect.

If someone says, "Oh that pedophile has molested thousands!" when they had molested one, I wouldn't agree with it but I would correct them by saying it wasn't true. In some cases, people mistake pointing out untrue statements as defending or supporting something.

Please read my post on WHY I defended Sanders on this page. It's on page 7...

you are trying to backpeddle, you said you ALWAYS defend the underdog in debate, so thus by your own words what I have posted is true. ALWAYS means ALWAYS not sometimes.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

sorry, but if someone decides they are going to support evil actions/policy. they have sided with evil, thus they are evil

I am not evil actually. I know this because I have been baptized with the holy spirit, and Jesus is my Lord and Savior. I will follow Him and the defending of those without a voice. I will defend God and His desire of us to care for "the least of these." I will not live my life with guilt, but with victory knowing that I am a beautiful daughter of God.

Nothing you call me has any weight, because my Savior has forgiven me many times and will never stop. I will meet the One who has died for me, and he will say, "Well done, good and faithful servant."

You don't know me or what I have done in my life. Through the anonymity of the internet your true colors are shown.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

you are trying to backpeddle, you said you ALWAYS defend the underdog in debate, so thus by your own words what I have posted is true. ALWAYS means ALWAYS not sometimes.

Plus, I usually choose not to debate, especially in topics like that. This is really the first "debate" (if you can call it that) I've had in a very long time.

 

[wisebeardman]

I am not evil actually. I know this because I have been baptized with the holy spirit, and Jesus is my Lord and Savior. I will follow Him and the defending of those without a voice. I will defend God and His desire of us to care for "the least of these." I will not live my life with guilt, but with victory knowing that I am a beautiful daughter of God.

Nothing you call me has any weight, because my Savior has forgiven me many times and will never stop. I will meet the One who has died for me, and he will say, "Well done, good and faithful servant."

You don't know me or what I have done in my life. Through the anonymity of the internet your true colors are shown.

Plus, I usually choose not to debate, especially in topics like that. This is really the first "debate" (if you can call it that) I've had in a very long time.

heh, you still do not get it.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

heh, you still do not get it.

Enlighten me on my evil ways.

 

[wisebeardman]

sadly I think you are blind. you just don't get the true message.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

Plus I'd say 90% of the time, I am defending Christians because they are the minority in my generation anyway. I even had a gent take down an entire thread because I told him I was happy to be persecuted, since the bible says the righteous will be.

 

[wisebeardman]

Plus I'd say 90% of the time, I am defending Christians because they are the minority in my generation anyway. I even had a gent take down an entire thread because I told him I was happy to be persecuted, since the bible says the righteous will be.

you should be defending Christians 100% of the time.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

you should be defending Christians 100% of the time.

I was saying 90% of my debates have previously involved religion. Of which I do defend Christians.

However, not all Christians are godly my friend. Some hide behind religion to control and judge others.

 

[wisebeardman]

However, not all Christians are godly my friend. Some hide behind religion to control and judge others.

defending evil isn't any better you know. if someone defends evil they are just as guilty as the evil doer. So defending anti-christian views or anti-christian politics is just as bad.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

defending evil isn't any better you know. if someone defends evil they are just as guilty as the evil doer. So defending anti-christian views or anti-christian politics is just as bad.

Except that just because a political system is different, it doesn't make it evil. I still don't understand why everyone believes this. It is just a different view.

Plus we have religious freedom here, so nobody on here is supporting anything anti-Christian.

 

[kaylagrl]

I defend underdogs because they are who a group is picking on. For example, I dislike Trump, but I would talk about his positive points if someone was defaming him or saying untrue things.

People hate Joel Osteen, but I have defended him too, because he has never said anything mean to anyone that I've heard, and nobody is perfect.

If someone says, "Oh that pedophile has molested thousands!" when they had molested one, I wouldn't agree with it but I would correct them by saying it wasn't true. In some cases, people mistake pointing out untrue statements as defending or supporting something.

Please read my post on WHY I defended Sanders on this page. It's on page 7...

But you cant defend what doesn't line up with the Word of God. Osteen has said there is more than one way to get to God. Its not a matter of hating the man.He is in error.He has a huge church,the question is,do they know the truth of Gods Word? That is what we are to defend as Christians,the Word of God,not the underdog.

 

[wisebeardman]

Except that just because a political system is different, it doesn't make it evil. I still don't understand why everyone believes this. It is just a different view.

Plus we have religious freedom here, so nobody on here is supporting anything anti-Christian.

you still do not get it. sadly I don't think you ever will.

 

[Nuns_n_roses]

But you cant defend what doesn't line up with the Word of God. Osteen has said there is more than one way to get to God. Its not a matter of hating the man.He is in error.He has a huge church,the question is,do they know the truth of Gods Word? That is what we are to defend as Christians,the Word of God,not the underdog.

I do defend the truth... They were not talking about his docrtine... They were just judging him for silly and pointless things unrelated to his beliefs. THAT is why I defended him, not because I think he's the greatest pastor in the world.