Is there a prophecy forum here? If there is, then where can it be found?
I suppose I experienced the opposite of the so-called "repressed memory" there. Sorry about that!
Is there a prophecy forum here? If there is, then where can it be found?
i didn't realize that was a thing ...i might be something close to that. i think we are in Chapter 19 of Rev and the false church is about to end for a thousand years.
the first horse of the four horseman is white ...for peace ...and he had a bow ...a rainbow ...and he conquered ...so who had peace and conquered at the same time?
constantine gave Roman peace to Christians ...and he started the byzantine empire. that means Rev didn't end in 70 A.D.
The entire Book of Rev is about The Churches. The Seven Churches of Rev are right by where the byzantine empire started ...Constantinople ...constantine's city named after him ...current day Istanbul, Turkey
i want your opinion on the first six posts of this ...i think you are one of the rare that might be able to handle it. if you don't like the first post, then just comment on that one? please
https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...eans-his-coming-was-a-different-event.208881/
Those are great observations. I see it more as a cycle that has occurred throughout history, much as we see exemplified in the book of Judges.
I also believe you can see the falling away from God, the subsequent chastisement and judgment, the repentance of God's people, and their eventual deliverance in varying ways throughout history.
I also found it interesting how predictable this is as is the nature and depth of sin as the falling away occurs.
This is incorrect. Jesus Himself told us what would precede His Second Coming (with His saints and angels) and there would be no mistaking this: Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall [1] the sun be darkened, and [2] the moon shall not give her light, and [3] the stars shall fall from heaven, and [4] the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of Heaven with power and great glory. (Mt 24:29,30)
So as a matter of fact all the inhabitants of the earth will have ample notice that the Second Coming of Christ is at hand. However, when Christ spoke of the Rapture, He made it clear that that event would be unannounced, unexpected, and imminent.
Yes, some in the distant past saw the end of the world in Matt. 24, but nothing like the modernists, dispensationalists teach it!
“It is to me a wonder,” says Bishop Newton, “how any man can refer part of the foregoing discourse to the destruction of Jerusalem, and part to the end of the world, or any other distant event, when it is said so positively here in the conclusion, All these things shall be fulfilled in this generation.
That is, heaven and earth shall sooner, or more easily pass away than my words; the frame of the universe shall sooner, or more easily pass away than my words shall not be fulfilled.
I can't really tell for sure by the way you've written this ^ , but I just want to make clear to the readers that dispensationalists do not teach that Matthew 24 is referring at all to "the end of the world"...
...rather, it refers to "the end [singular] of the age [singular]"... The disciples' question to Jesus in verse 3 was BASED ON what He had ALREADY spoken to them about in Matthew 13:24,30,39,40,49-50 regarding "the end [singular] of the age [singular]" (when the "angels" will REAP)...
(note: not "the ends [plural] of the ages [plural]" as in 1Cor10:11; nor "the end [singular] of the ages [plural]" as in Heb9:26; and others which are also similar-sounding phrases but which are also distinct from each of these and each other..., which I won't go all into here in this post.)
I can't really tell for sure by the way you've written this ^ , but I just want to make clear to the readers that dispensationalists do not teach that Matthew 24 is referring at all to "the end of the world"...
...rather, it refers to "the end [singular] of the age [singular]"... The disciples' question to Jesus in verse 3 was BASED ON what He had ALREADY spoken to them about in Matthew 13:24,30,39,40,49-50 regarding "the end [singular] of the age [singular]" (when the "angels" will REAP)...
(note: not "the ends [plural] of the ages [plural]" as in 1Cor10:11; nor "the end [singular] of the ages [plural]" as in Heb9:26; and others which are also similar-sounding phrases but which are also distinct from each of these and each other..., which I won't go all into here in this post.)
Historic premillenniaism did not turn the 1000 years into a renewed Old Covenant, a new Jewish state..
The Scriptures teaching the resurrection and the judgment occurring on "the last day", is the "end of the world" as we know it. But dispensationalists end up with multiple resurrections, not just two of the historic premillennialists or the one by post-mils and a-mils.
Not a problem.I suppose I experienced the opposite of the so-called "repressed memory" there. Sorry about that!![]()
Is it possible to have a conversation on a subject in this website without being so staunch, religious theological idealists?It's poor exegesis of scripture to view eschatology, or any other subject, by comparing scripture with current events. Scripture should be compared to scripture.
A better understanding of biblical events would come from studying scripture. In the past, when scripture was being fulfilled God gave revelation of this.
Simply stated, if you are determining an understanding of scripture from current events, you may well be considerably off base. This is in my opinion why every generation believed they were the last and why they were so wrong.
Did you object to the substance of the post or a perceived tone?Is it possible to have a conversation on a subject in this website without being so staunch, religious theological idealists?