F
ForgiveMeGod
Guest
Well, he does hold to "King James version only". Some call that a cult.![]()
I wouldn’t say that is a cult but just kinda strange that they don’t give any other translations a chance…especially like NIV or ESV.
Well, he does hold to "King James version only". Some call that a cult.![]()
Well, since you haven't retracted this calamity of a claim, I'll quote a few of your unbiblical "sticking points"...
None of those things is in Scripture, so clearly you are NOT "sticking with exactly what we know from scripture." Your extrapolations from the words of Scripture are not themselves Scripture. If you clearly distinguish the two, there won't be a problem.
I have always believed this to be the case.
Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
However I have come to doubt this theory now as i've actually read the book of Enoch and it contradicts the Bible in some details, not to mention just doesn't "sound right" Doesn't sound like its from the spirit of God. I can discern that its not. You may disagree thats fine but that is where we must agree to disagree.
Jesus says: Matthew 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
How could angels coming down and fornicating with women work if this is the case?
Is there any credible alternative explanation? In the OT, "sons of God" most often means angels, doesn't it?
Help a brother out here.
I see no real reason to think the "sons of God" were angels of any kind. The text seems pretty self-explanatory: When men and women began to multiply on the earth, the men took wives for themselves.
Well, since you haven't retracted this calamity of a claim, I'll quote a few of your unbiblical "sticking points"...
None of those things is in Scripture, so clearly you are NOT "sticking with exactly what we know from scripture." Your extrapolations from the words of Scripture are not themselves Scripture. If you clearly distinguish the two, there won't be a problem.
Well, he does hold to "King James version only". Some call that a cult.![]()
Sounds like he attends a cult
All of it is in scripture except for how we will all be males, but that is a strong conclusion when comparing scripture with scripture. You should try it sometime.
They remain safe because God supplied them with an abundance of grace to be celibate.
Why did God create angels with the ability to procreate in the first place?
There is an answer for that.
A strong conclusion when Paul explicitly said there is neither male not female in Christ?
Can't wait to hear it!
A strong conclusion when Paul explicitly said there is neither male not female in Christ?
A strong conclusion when Paul explicitly said there is neither male not female in Christ?
Again, that is our spiritual state, in Christ. That's not a reference to our physical state. In the resurrection, we will have physical bodies of flesh and bone like Christ. We are a tri-part being, body, soul, and spirit. All parts of us will be made new and united together.
Still no reply on how or where the giants in the earth came from? In Noah's day and after that?
Well the logical conclusion is that those bodies will be asexual, ie neither male nor female, just as Paul said. I don't understand the resistance to this idea. It must be due to a carnal frame of reference that can't imagine another reality
I gave you the answer that all of the supposed half-breeds died in the flood, so the giants in Israel's time couldn't have descended from them. And that gigantism is a natural phenomenon based on genetic factors.
![]()
It is a denial that we will have physical bodies. God created the human body in the beginning to be male or female. You are comparing spiritual things to physical things.
wow, so if you believe angels would of procreated with humans then you would have to also believe that God Himself permitted that to happen which He would never allow. The angles who were casted out were casted out as the result of the Archangel Satan rebelling against God and leading to a war, not because of procreating. c'mon.