Go and do your homework, and don't respond until and unless you do. If you want to be treated like an adult, act like one.There is not any error on my part (unless you want to point it out in a post that will be forward and not backward); and in calling me a fool you are in danger of hell fire (Matthew 5:22).
Most translations indicate that the context of the third statement (actually, second, in the text) is marriage. "The man is the head of the woman" or something similar.
"Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way opened for us through the curtain of His body, and since we have a great priest over the house of God..."
yeah...heard this one before but I do not agree with it. sounds pretty iffy
all sexes are resident in a man if you want to look at it that way, since the man determines the sex of the baby conceived
(sorry...not picking on you...even though with 2 threads wherein we are not quite agreeing, it might seem so)
I had to correct my post and say that it is concerning the New Testament.
There are in fact protocols for propriety in worship in the New Testament.
Start at post 77 and work forward. You will see that you did not make the claim that started the dialogue.There is not any error on my part (unless you want to point it out in a post that will be forward and not backward); and in calling me a fool you are in danger of hell fire (Matthew 5:22).
I don't go backward (Philippians 3:13). If you have a refutation, by all means give it.Go and do your homework, and don't respond until and unless you do. If you want to be treated like an adult, act like one.
yes there are
and women were not, as a general rule as opposed to the situation in the church in Corinth which had myriad problems. told to be seen and not heard. ever
women prophesied in church in the NT.
were they using sign language?
so any church, according to some, that allow women to even sing in church or say anything...including hello how are you...are in error
silent is silent
I did not respond to post #77.Start at post 77 and work forward. You will see that you did not make the claim that started the dialogue.
Yes, because Emily has not affirmed that the passages you cited are the ones that motivated her claim.But I see what happened.
I supported the claim that was made by @EmilyNats.
So, you think that the fact that the claim was supported by a different person means that the claim remains unsupported?
Yes, because Emily has not affirmed that the passages you cited are the ones that motivated her claim.
Actually, the admonition to be silent in in 1 Corinthians 14, while the 'teach or usurp authority' is in 1 Timothy. They are not the same context.In context, it is referring to a woman teaching or usurping authority over a man.
@EmilyNats.Yes, because Emily has not affirmed that the passages you cited are the ones that motivated her claim.
They are in the same topical context, according to the hermeneutic that we find in 1 Corinthians 2:13 (kjv).Actually, the admonition to be silent in in 1 Corinthians 14, while the 'teach or usurp authority' is in 1 Timothy. They are not the same context.
You just don't get it. Not only is your reasoning circular, but you are simply wrong. Only Emily herself can affirm that those verses substantiate her claim; nobody else can do so.I am saying that the passages that were cited substantiate her claim...and the passages themselves affirm this reality.
@EmilyNats.You just don't get it. Not only is your reasoning circular, but you are simply wrong. Only Emily herself can affirm that those verses substantiate her claim; nobody else can do so.
That's not how context is used. Paul wrote to Timothy with specific issues in mind. He wrote to the Corinthians with different specific issues in mind.They are in the same topical context, according to the hermeneutic that we find in 1 Corinthians 2:13 (kjv).
Even though I can indeed give verses that substantiate her claim; which is affirmed by the verses in question; because they do indeed substantiate her claim; as can be seen by anyone with a brain.