Your objection is duly noted and I appreciate your response, but there is a choice option that doesn't agree with me.
Really, how'd I miss that?! I'm pretty good at disagreeing with people. Shoot I'm gettin' slow in my old age.
Your objection is duly noted and I appreciate your response, but there is a choice option that doesn't agree with me.
I agree. Speak the truth in love. I'm just not sure what passes for love here is actually love.
I appreciate that you have taken the time to respond. I purposefully designed the thread so what I believe isn't considered in anyone's answer so while I have no problem answering your questions in another thread, it would be counter to my goal here.I have questions and explanations though. Sorry!
Regarding Q1: When Adam actually sinned and ate of the fruit, didn't that show his heart and mind was already corrupted? Because sin starts in a person's heart or mind. The physical part of eating the forbidden fruit is usually the part you can see and is a result of what's already in the heart or mind.
Regarding Q3: This statement is incomplete to me and can't be answered at this point. It sounds like God chooses arbitrarily. Don't you ever wonder how God chooses people He wants to send to His Son?
John 6:37
All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.
But everyone so far just stops there. It sounds like the Father's choice have no rhyme or reason. But look further down the verses, it shows how God chooses the people He sends to His Son:
John 6:45
It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me.
So God's choice isn't arbitrary at all. The people the Father sends to Jesus are those who hear the Father and learn from Him.
So if you had included that verse, I would have answered "True".
Aren't we all.Really, how'd I miss that?! I'm pretty good at disagreeing with people. Shoot I'm gettin' slow in my old age.
I agree. Speak the truth in love. I'm just not sure what passes for love here is actually love.
their hate for calvinism has them blinded.
Just like the flip side.. the calvinist who can not see because of his fear of being attacked or hatred for armenian
your thinking to hard and seem to be stuck on calvinist viewNope. No vote change because in context John 3:16 God invites all. God wishes all to be saved 1 Timothy 2:4. God has opened the door to all and the one who comes, Jesus is faithful to fulfill His promise of salvation.
Jesus is faithful but not always the Christian as scripture also speaks of those who will fall away or apostate. Another reason why Jesus says to abide in the vine or be at risk of being cut off and thrown to the fire. Jesus leaves us no room for either believe this or that. Scripture doesn't contradict so it has to be this and this. They are to add to the interpretation.
If God wants all to be saved then why can't an all powerful God do that?
Why all the commands to believe, have faith, abide, remain, faithfulness, etc?
Why all the warnings to believers about being led astray?
Calvinism is just unBiblical but I don't believe it will lead someone to Hell. It is just the teachings of straw and hay versus silver and gold.
Gods grace is resistible.
Humanity is required to choose.
All are without excuse.
God's elect are those found in the Book of Life.
The Book of life is predestined by the foreknowledge of God knowing who will abide and who will not.
The no crowd is just as much Christian as you but interpret the Bible differently.
Oh well, this has been debated for centuries and a million times on Chistian chat.
I see and understand. I just try not to read a persons mind or intention.. If his intention is bad in the end it will show.. If not. and I accuse him, I have falsly accused..I'm more concerned about his bent toward antisemitism. He and Luther, and several other church fathers. But I won't derail a thread over it. Just a thought on this post.
But, but... God did make him that way. Adam was of the natural world... That does not mean thatHi Mem, this is just a thought, but wouldn't "the other way around" lay the blame for Adam's moral corruption, evil and sin (as well ours) directly at God's feet, since "the other way around" would have to mean that God made him that way
.
I see and understand. I just try not to read a persons mind or intention.. If his intention is bad in the end it will show.. If not. and I accuse him, I have falsly accused..
Also. I will not understand what he is asking and most likely my response will show a lack of understanding. and I make myself look foolish
I should take your advice.. May help me..lolYep, that's the reason I skip a lot of threads. Seems I'm not near as bright as I thought I was. Figure it's better to keep quiet and not show my lack of understanding.
Blessed are the peacemakers...
I would have mercy and not sacrifice...
He who would gain his life must lose it...
Deny yourself...
We've sharpened until we're nothing but points so that no matter what direction we turn
we cut. We've just gotten so used to the blood, the sight of it no longer evokes mercy.
But it certainly helps!!!
We are by nature children of wrath and deserving of God's wrath beforeNot true. Adam had a "normal human nature" before AND after he tossed God under
the bus, but he DID DIE SPIRITUALLY in the same way we all do the first time we SIN.
You had good intentions but division is good when it comes to truth.
Probably a good time to post the Words of Jesus Himself. And then maybe some of the NO number 3 guys will change their vote.
John 6:37
New King James Version
37" All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out."
So how is it possible for a Christian to vote no?
This particular Christian reads on to verse 38-40 which clarifies God's will.
37Everyone the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will never drive away.
38For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but to do the will of Him who sent Me.
39And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that I shall lose none of those He has given Me, but raise them up at the last day. 40For it is My Father’s will that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in Him shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.”
We are by nature children of wrath and deserving of God's wrath before
being saved. Was Adam by nature deserving of wrath before he sinned? -![]()
your thinking to hard and seem to be stuck on calvinist view
Yes, the context is all are invited.
Yet only those who believe will recieve
so question number three states, whoever is given (those who see and believe john 6) will come and be given eternal life (will by no means be cast out) is true
But it all depends on how you define these topics of depravity, election, and predestination.