because that's the way you want to believe it or because that is what is actually written?And, it is talking about [the 'event' of] the Second Coming of Christ. (Not every verse in the chapter, but parts of it.)
because that's the way you want to believe it or because that is what is actually written?And, it is talking about [the 'event' of] the Second Coming of Christ. (Not every verse in the chapter, but parts of it.)
I have studied it extensively; that is my conclusion.because that's the way you want to believe it or because that is what is actually written?
I have studied it extensively; that is my conclusion.
Believe what you will...
At the moment - not sure. What do you think?Which nation is referred to here, if you don't mind my asking?
Joel 1:Wake up, you drunkards, and weep;
and wail, all you wine-drinkers,
over the sweet wine,
for it is cut off from your mouth.
6 For a nation has invaded my land,
powerful and innumerable;
its teeth are lions’ teeth,
and it has the fangs of a lioness.
7 It has laid waste my vines,
and splintered my fig trees;
it has stripped off their bark and thrown it down;
their branches have turned white.
Sorry - had a memory mixup...Really.
Do you know who the Medes are?
Do you realize that the city of Babylon - today - is the richest city on earth?
(Yes - the same city of Babylon - the old one which is also the new one.)
The city of Babylon has "come full circle" - did you know that?
Today, there are more riches in Babylon than anywhere else on earth - including the Vatican.
Happens to us all Gary.Sorry - had a memory mixup...
I was thinking about Dubai - which has been referred to as the New Babylon.
I just spelled it out for you why that's not the case with the "definite article", go find anywhere in the passage where it speaks of FAITH, anywhere in the whole chapter. I will wait, but you will not be able to reply brother. Paul was telling the Thessalonians not to worry, they would not be here for God's WRath, and the Departure AND the Anti-Christ both show up before God's Wrath. To me it's not complicated, it's again people not being able to let go of old think. The Pharisees did the same thing, that's why Jesus had to get babes, We are dealing with END TIME THINGS that God decided not to reveal until the very end times (God told Daniel that) yet we are bringing our understandings of PRE God opening that vault and God told me 5 years or so ago that us already "KNOWING EVERYTHING" was hindering Him from teaching us what we needed to know. A lot of things I learned came after that encounter. I didn't just continue to rely on my 30 years of knowledge, I of course kept what I knew that I knew as correct, but things that were just ACCEPTED, like the 144,000 Super Preachers which is NOWHERE in the bible or those seen in Rev. 7:9-17 as being out of the 70th-week tribulation, when they can't be, etc., etc., I stopped just accepting when men had passed down and starting reading and asking Gid, Hey, its the End Times, SHOW ME NEW THINGS NEVER BEFORE REVEALED.As I have pointed out so many times, the word 'apostasia' can be translated as 'defection, apostasy, departure (implying desertion), falling away, etc. If you use the word 'departure' then it must retain the original meaning of 'apostasia.' Therefore departure must mean to depart from faith and cannot mean departing up into the wild blue yonder. It can't be used that way! The only other place that the word 'apostasia' is used, is in Acts 21:21 which is referring to departing from the law of Moses. It can't be forced to mean to depart up into the air.
The Rapture is Pre trib and that's not even debatable. So, the rest of the point is just us OFFTRACKING.I've read similar arguments and they don't work. Here's why:
Because the alleged departure [of the church] in a hoped-for pre-trib rapture doesn't happen until the day of Christ's return and our being gathered to Him does not happen until Christ returns.
Skip a few verses down and it's evident Jesus doesn't return until after the man of sin (anti-Christ figure) is already in the temple claiming to be God. Jesus destroys this man with the brightness of His coming.
2 Thessalonians 2:8
8And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
This conclusively means that Jesus returns to end the great tribulation, marking it with the annihilation of the wicked man of sin known as the anti-Christ. The departure of the church in a rapture won't happen until after the great tribulation.
I don't know Greek, but the people who translated a great variety of translations and versions do. There's widespread consensus that the "departure" is actually a departure from a faith once held, not a departure from one geographical location to another. It means apostasy and it's what we would refer to as falling away, abandoning our faith, etc.
So, in my honest opinion, you gave it a good shot, but ultimately what you're suggesting just doesn't fit the context.
Also, I might add that the "restrainer" most likely is not the Holy Spirit. There's a few problems with that:
1. The two witnesses of the great tribulation perform miracles. Miracles are performed through the working of the Holy Spirit. No Holy Spirit of God - no miracles.
2. Those on Earth who make up the church will be present for the great tribulation, meaning that if the restrainer is the Holy Spirit and He is removed then the whole church just lost their Born Again status.
3. If you don't agree that all of those on Earth who make up the church will be present for the great tribulation then there's evidence in Revelation that says there will be some saints present in the mark of the beats period. No Holy Spirit - no saints.
Just doesn't work. I propose to you that the restrainer is Michael the Archangel. Read the later chapters in Daniel. It seems most likely.
And, it is talking about [the 'event' of] the Second Coming of Christ. (Not every verse in the chapter, but parts of it.)
The Rapture is Pre trib and that's not even debatable. So, the rest of the point is just us OFFTRACKING.
You miss it but get it right. Mr. Covolution (LOL)
The Holy Spirit is indeed NOT taken off of the earth, but He is the POWER that Restrains, but just as God made Moses hold up the Staff to win the battle, we the Church use the POWER of the Holy Spirit to restrain the Best from coming forth. I mean Occam's Razor should tell us this is true, the Last Beast was Rome, there will never be another east union, the Church is Raptured !! Thus, when the Church DEPARTS the Holy Spirit loses his VEHICLE to thwart the Beast. One might say, Ohh Yea? God could thwart the Beast any time He wanted to? Well, He could, but before the Church got on death He didn't do it for nigh 1000 straight years, thus we forget, it's a part of God's plan of punishment for 70 weeks against Israel, a design to make them repent.
The Remnant Church will be here fr the trib, but they will all be killed. The Holy Spirit never leaves,, the Two-witnesses are on earth right up until the 7th Trump, they die 75 days before the Beast dies.
The RESTRAINER is the Holy Spirit working in tandem with the Church thus once we leave, the Holy Spirit allows the Anti-Christ to go forth conquering.
Either the restrainer is taken out of the way or not. You're trying to say the restrainer is taken out of the way while simultaneously present and active. That isn't how this works. In order to avoid contradictions the restrainer probably isn't the Holy Spirit. The restrainer is someone or something else.
The text states it like this, though:
"7b... the [one] restraining at present, will restrain, UNTIL out of the midst he be come [/come to be], 8 AND THEN [kai tote]..."
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/2_thessalonians/2-7.htm
... which is worded is very similar language to that of:
"[Lam2] 3b... he hath drawn back his right hand from before the enemy, and he burned against Jacob like a flaming fire, which devoureth round about."
The words "... drawn back his right hand from before the enemy" is the LIFTING OF THE RESTRAINT on the enemy, thereby releasing the enemy onto the scene of things, i.e. letting 'er rip!--It is not the total vanishing of the "right hand" that previously was RESTRAINING the enemy, but the removal of the RESTRAINING ROLE / EFFECT.
So in the case of "the Holy Spirit," it is NOT that the Holy Spirit Himself completely vanishes off the scene, but that His ROLE in "RESTRAINING AT PRESENT" is lifted... Kind of in the same way that PRIOR TO His [/the HS] "coming" to permanently INDWELL believers/the Church which is His body (see Jesus' reference to this in John 7:39 and John 16:7), in His role [now] as the Comforter / Advocate / Helper / Paraklétos (IN us), He still existed and was still omnipresent... His role simply differed prior to that point.
So here, in this text (context), I believe another "role-change" is being referenced... taking place to pave way for the "man of sin" to be released onto the scene, a "SCENE-CHANGE" to come into play, so to speak, and the set-up for "the LIE / the FALSE / the PSEUDEI" to be "believed" by certain ones (FOLLOWING this particular "change of scenes"). If certain things were "spelled out" the way some insist, this would defeat the purpose God has for that future time-period when "HE SHALL SEND TO THEM" great delusion "IN ORDER THAT THEY should believe THE LIE / THE FALSE / THE PSEUDEI" (IN / DURING the TRIB yrs, FOLLOWING this "scene-change"
... when "the man of sin" will be existing and will DO ALL that he is slated TO DO within those 7 yrs, after the "RESTRAINING [AT PRESENT]" is lifted, see...)
What's it all about?
It's not rocket science.
What holds back lawlessness?
Couldn't possibly be .....
the Law?
I really like you Ahwatukee, and I like yellow T-Shirts.
But you are so terribly wrong here my friend
See Isaiah 13
6 Howl ye; for the day of the Lord is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty.
I just spelled it out for you why that's not the case with the "definite article", go find anywhere in the passage where it speaks of FAITH, anywhere in the whole chapter. I will wait, but you will not be able to reply brother. Paul was telling the Thessalonians not to worry, they would not be here for God's WRath, and the Departure AND the Anti-Christ both show up before God's Wrath.
Also, I might add that the "restrainer" most likely is not the Holy Spirit. There's a few problems with that:
1. The two witnesses of the great tribulation perform miracles. Miracles are performed through the working of the Holy Spirit. No Holy Spirit of God - no miracles.
2. Those on Earth who make up the church will be present for the great tribulation, meaning that if the restrainer is the Holy Spirit and He is removed then the whole church just lost their Born Again status.
3. If you don't agree that all of those on Earth who make up the church will be present for the great tribulation then there's evidence in Revelation that says there will be some saints present in the mark of the beats period. No Holy Spirit - no saints.
Just doesn't work. I propose to you that the restrainer is Michael the Archangel. Read the later chapters in Daniel. It seems most likely.
I submit for your consideration that this "restrainer" isn't a Person/Being at all but the "circumstance" around the man of lawlessness appearing, that's preventing the coming of the Messiah.