Search results

for example Joseph and Benjamin were born to Rachel, who stole her father's idols. the most wicked, but most beloved of Jacob's wives. are therefore Joseph and Benjamin evil damnable people for whom the entire earth should be destroyed? simply because of who their mother is? no. instead they...

in my opinion, as astounding as the implications are, the only view that fits is angelic/human mixed. the other two views i can poke holes in big enough for an oil tanker to sail through, with my pinky finger

they were evil because they weren't descendents of Jacob? the Bible is clear on that. doesn't fit. they were evil because one of their parents believed and the other didn't? the Bible is also clear on that. doesn't fit either.

"race" as understood in our culture is a relatively modern excuse for snobbery and prejudgement. before the Renaissance era, people thought of others alien to them in terms of nationhood, not skin color or genetic inheritance. but what do you think Cain-ites and Seth-ites are, in terms of of...

study what the churches in the so-called Bible belt preached about Genesis 6-9 in the years leading up to the American Civil War. it is a direct implication of believing the flood was a judgement on mixed marriage between descendents of Cain and Seth.

that has no bearing on whether a Moabite or Canaanite marrying an Israelite is worth destroying all living souls on earth, including sinless animals. this situation is part of the line of Christ: don't forget Ruth and Rahab. if that view of Genesis 6 is correct, Christ is a damnable bastard...

and that He would instead do it by fire. mixed marriage between two nations or tribes simply cannot explain the data.

The Bible says that the children of one unbeliever and one believer are sanctified because of the belief of the one, not wicked. See 1 Cor. 7 posted above. That the entire world was completely destroyed because of interracial marriage? it does not fit, nope.

Which by the way, the Bible actually condones 1 Corinthians 7:13-14 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband...

well then why do you believe God has not destroyed the entire world again for Christians marrying non Christians, or Jews marrying non Jews, and that Christians/believers or even true Israel are a physically hereditary group? because that has continued to happen Every Day Of Every Year For...

yes!

Yay! i spy with my little eye... figs and raisins refreshing Egypt, after three days and three nights... :unsure:

Joshua 2:15 Then she let them down by a rope through the window, for her house [was] on the city wall; she dwelt on the wall.

i saw the original font last night, and it was a little harder to read. I do like this one! :)

nope. 'their' refers to 'many' and 'many' < 'all' you've been shown a dozen other scriptures confirming this but you reject and ignore them all. really no use talking to you anymore.

i like the font :)

this is really key. God did not lie when He sent His Son to be the Savior of the whole world. John 4:42, 1 John 4:14

nope. this hypercalvanism is in clear conflict with the word of God, which says "all" - - not all are saved, but to all salvation is legitimately offered.

the condemned have this Salvation offered to them, but refuse to receive it, exactly like all these scriptures have been offered to you, but you refuse to receive His Word.

you're not paying any attention. you have the Word given to you, but you do not receive it.