Search results

That's basically what I said, but ok. Either way, that definition has nothing to do with asking a question over and over again like the other user claimed.

And that's just your opinion for which you have provided NO biblical proof.

That verse refers to unbelievers, not disagreements between believers. Everyone claims they are the ones who have the true understanding of the word of God, but most contradict each other, so that's the point of this discussion, to find the truth.

Pharisees also made the word of God of no effect, but Jesus still told everyone to obey them (Mathew 23:3) Most of the world governments don't even recognize the word of God, and yet Romans 13:1 still commands us to be under their authority.

You're literally the one who brought this up from page 30:ROFL:

No, I provided Bible verses for my argument, you didn't. So unless you have something valuable to contribute, please stop spamming my post.

That fallacy has nothing to do with asking a question over and over again, you don't even know what you're talking about. It's about making an assumption when asking the question, sort of like a strawman argument.

No, you've addressed some of the verses I provided and I disputed it using biblical proof, you then gave up and stopped replying. Good night.

None of these are relevant to the discussion at hand and none of these proved your faulty opinions. Also, you are lying again when I already clarified that some people call themselves atheists, but really aren't, so that doesn't even apply.

RCC originated from Papal succession starting from Peter. Council of Nicea was in 325, Rome did not adopt Christianity until 380.

Good point, but it seems like Ignatius is one of the few Catholics if not the only one who held this belief.

Lets look closely at what happens after James and Peter stop talking. It does say (in verse 13) how Paul and Barnabas "fall silent," allowing James to respond, this does not take away from the entire assembly "falling silent" after Peter's teaching in verse 12. Why? Because we are dealing with 2...

Got you, you lying narcissist! You keep quoting me out of context because you don't actually read anything before replaying with blind ignorance! That's not what I said. I said... I haven't assumed anything about you unless you ignored questions multiple times or danced around it, then it's a...

No, that's from the Bible. You don't get to dismiss biblical proof without refuting it first.

I'm the one who actually quotes from and relies on the word of God here, not you. You haven't quoted a single Bible verse to back up any of your erroneous opinions. I haven't assumed anything about you unless you ignored questions multiple times or danced around it, then it's a safe bet to...

Catholicism didn't even become official in Rome until 380ad. Just because the word pope isn't mentioned doesn't mean anything. The words like trinity and rapture aren't mentioned either, but they are still a biblical concept. The many verses I provided are proof of Peter being the chief...

Yes, people lie to themselves, just like you're lying to yourself when you think you're not an ungodly rebel.

You have NO IDEA what you're talking about. Go back and re-read. I made it clear that some people call themselves atheist, but still have a tiny bit of faith. And nice try derailing from the argument to make your opinions look more valid. Good day!

More baseless opinions from you.

What does that have to do with anything?