Search results

Therefore, we should toss the KJV, because it was not the first complete English edition, and brought about confusion. Next time, think through your arguments before you post them.

Says the guy who parrots one bad argument after another.

Hi Danigirl... What you are doing, essentially, is practicing divination. You are dictating to God how and when He is to answer you. A much better way, which is consistent with scriptural teaching, is to ask the Lord to teach you how to hear (and trust) His voice, and let Him lead you...

Wow. What colour is the sky in your world?

That's called a non sequitur, which means "it does not follow". That God is unchanging does not require that the law given to ancient Israel is the same law written on our hearts. It is not written on the Christian's heart to stone adulterers.

God was selective of race, whether you like it or not. He specifically chose Israel for Himself. He had a purpose in selecting Israel and He fulfilled His purposes through them. He had a purpose for the law and He fulfilled His purposes in the law. You're making a category error.

You have heard: God did not "improve" the old covenant; He REPLACED it. You have heard it repeatedly, and still you reject it.

I didn't say anything of the sort. You are changing the subject. Read more carefully.

You just added to Jesus' words. Stephen, James, many others, and likely some of the 12 apostles died before the canon of Scripture was complete. Was the Holy Spirit unable to lead them into all truth? How then is the Holy Spirit not able to lead Christians into all truth even if they don't have...

I'll provide the information when I have some time to post it.

I smell a false dichotomy.

I am well aware that there are passages that appear in the KJV and not in some modern translations. That doesn't substantiate your assertion that the KJV is the standard. All it does is demonstrate that there are differences. I am confident that I won't be, for Jesus didn't say, "He will be...

That is simply inane. Any other ridiculous comments you want to make?

You have already demonstrated that you are either unwilling or unable to learn from me. You will learn if you are motivated to learn, and put in the effort to chase down the information. If you are sincere in your desire to learn, I recommend that you read Dr. James White's The King James Only...

That's the thing: it wasn't given to "us"; it was given to ancient Israel. How do you figure that?

In other words, you have opinions, but not facts. Please, for your own sake, do your homework.

So now there are eleven commandments? No. The ten commandments were part of the Law, and there is nothing in Scripture justifying a division of the commandments from the rest of the Law as given through Moses. It is one Law, delivered in hundreds of individual statutes. As both Paul and James...

Any claim that a modern text is incorrect simply on the basis that it is different from the KJV is simply groundless. The KJV is not the standard against which English renderings are to be judged. It is equally valid to say the KJV is incorrect because it does not match the NASB.

Lol... you really should think before you blast off your posts. Because you are so certain that you put it in bold-face type, I'm going to demonstrate your error--or ignorance--in all points. Exactly: He translated the KJV back into Greek. Whether he cobbled together the bits of Greek texts...

Scrivener’s work is a translation from the English KJV into Greek. There is no Greek manuscript that reads exactly the same way. The TR is an eclectic text no less than the modern Nestle-Alland.