Search results

Wrong. A good deed is you doing something.

Good, because you're awfully close to employing a non sequitur in your reasoning. Perhaps you are unaware of the fossil evidence proving that the environment prior to the flood was quite different to the world today. That fact alone is enough to explain the decreased life spans. Consumption of...

Did these studies control for consumption of vegetable oils? Sugar? Highly processed foods? Other toxins? Exercise habits? If not, they prove nothing.

Wrong again. All these "least" are humans. And? None of this proves your point in the least. The problem was not that they wanted meat, and certainly not that they killed birds to eat them, but that they didn't trust the Lord. Ponder that deeply, so that your spiritual status isn't "Unsure"...

Awww... that picture really moooves me.

Repeating yourself is pointless when you were wrong the first time.

Baruch is not considered Scripture by most Christians. Don't bother quoting it in the same way folks quote the Bible. By the way, the word is "beginning"; only two 'g's, and three 'n's.

Let's be sure we distinguish "principles" from instructions given to specific peoples in specific times and places. Show us the science to support your rather exaggerated claim. Again, show us the science. That which I've seen says the polar opposite. Agreed; though wanton killing of animals...

Wrong. Adultery is only one of the "kinds" of sex that is forbidden; many others, including bestiality, are identified specifically in the Law, meaning your treatment of both adultery and murder is flawed. Again, wrong. Your first premise is false, so you have no basis for the second...

Can you quote even a single self-identified preterist who ignores your "biblical concept of 'generation'" rather than rejecting it? That doesn't even make sense. If you think it does, please provide evidence. In the KJV, "generation" appears 38 times. In the NASB, it appears 37 times; your...

I challenge you to examine "deep" (Gen. 1:2; Prov. 8:27-28) the same way. Let's see how far your approach takes you. If you think "circle" must use the dictionary definition, then it is only right that you use the same dictionary's definition for "deep" as well.

Here is the broader context of Proverbs 8:27 from the OP's selected NKJV: 22 “The Lord possessed me at the beginning of His way, Before His works of old. 23 I have been established from everlasting, From the beginning, before there was ever an earth. 24 When there were no depths I was brought...

I have never argued anything to the contrary. Wow, you are full of yourself. The equator is only one of an infinite number of lines of circumference. You have not demonstrated that you understand the simple fact that there can be circles on the surface of a sphere that are not circumferential...

Pssst... "solid" does not equal "opaque"; think 'glass'. ;) I agree with the rest of your post though.

Nice.

You just proved my point. Thanks.

Every "version" of the KJV I can find does not have that wording. Instead it has... When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth: Obviously you aren't using the KJV. Um... how about the context of Scripture? "Surface" must first be understood as...

Simple question: IS this your conclusion? If it is, then it would have been appropriate to put it first, but clearly presented as such, like the abstract of an academic paper. You would phrase it something like this: "Having done an analysis of the relevant text, I have concluded that...." By...

^^^THIS^^^ is "An Analysis"? Um, no. This is an a priori conclusion. Had you done your analysis and come to that conclusion, it would at least be valid (though not necessarily correct). As you have worded it, you determined your conclusion before you started any analysis.

Please provide chapter and verse for that. Bible Gateway can't find such a verse. As this context is not, strictly, geometry, one cannot assume that every term implies the strict geometric sense. "Face" can mean "surface" and nothing is lost... except your imposed flatness. As you haven't...