Search results

When you get around to reading Scripture for yourself, you will find the answers; they are all there. Asked and answered already. We aren't discussing murder.

God told the truth in Hebrew and Greek. That truth doesn't necessarily come through to English with the same clarity.

I wasn't suggesting that you couldn't. There's more to learning than reading though.

You have much more homework to do. The Hebrew word translated 'serpent' is not simple, and the context tells us this was not a member of the animal kingdom.

This is totally off topic. Satan is not and never was merely an animal.

(Regarding human need for 8 specific amino acids) Don't be ridiculous. The Bible has 66 books and letters in it, and Baruch is not one of them. I don't disagree that there have been printings and translations of the Bible that included the Apocrypha, but they are not considered Scripture by...

When it comes to the Bible's record of what Jesus did, one "witness" is enough... for that witness is God Himself. Your premise is simply wrong.

Also, given that He later forbade the Israelites from touching a carcass, it's rather unlikely. :)

There is, however, a human physical need for eight specific amino acids. It is difficult to obtain these in bioavailable form and in balance from plant sources only. Eat meat, get them all, in balance. It's an easy choice. No, it doesn't. It proved that for Daniel and his companions, eating...

Learn how to read. "That's a stupid question" is not "You're a stupid person."

I would encourage you to read up on the Inuit peoples. They traditionally eat meat exclusively, and, where their ways are preserved, are among the healthiest on the planet.

You just won the entire thread. Congratulations. :)

Wow. Do you feel better now?

Good; I agree with you.

Agreed. You could have stopped right there. Your argument is fallacious. The vegetarian diet was best in that environment. We don't live in that environment, so the best diet for there and then is not necessarily the "best" diet for here and now.

Completely irrelevant misapplication of Scripture. Here's the verse we were discussing: If anyone, then, knows the good they ought to do and doesn’t do it, it is sin for them. (NIV) If we take your verses at face value, James 4:17 is contradictory because it is impossible for us to do the...

Although if it is what I suspect, it's the udder gender. ;)

That's a stupid question. There is no other description for it. Why even bother taking the time to type it? Says the guy who just quoted Baruch as though it were Scripture.

Your application of it was wrong the first time, and it was wrong the second time, and it is wrong the third time. Don't bother trying to twist my words; I'll call you on it every time.