Search results

The dots between actual Scripture and your position? Correct, I can’t.

Exactly! It’s a statement of certain consequence.

It’s completely ridiculous to quote Scripture and add words which conveniently support your a priori interpretation.

Listening to your wife is, of course, a good thing. Listening and doing what she says when it contradicts what God has clearly said, as Adam did, is not a good thing. Adam was under no "pressure" at all from her; CYN's assertion remains completely without scriptural support.

Still you have provided no support for your claim of "pressure". One only "obeys" a superior authority, whereas Eve had equal authority.

Question: How does "heeded" relate to "pressure"? Answer: It doesn't.

That contradicts your earlier post.

That is speculation, as there is absolutely nothing in the text to support that conclusion.

That sounds like a catch-22. Adam did not sin until he ate of the fruit, but he also was not corrupted until he ate of the fruit. How could he sin before he sinned, or be corrupted before he was corrupted?

I might say this thread blows, but it 'snot a nice thing to say.

Was Jesus "human" before He was incarnate? A simple 'yes' or 'no' will do.

No surprise there. :)

To date, there have been many true Christians. Wait... ;)

Your study’s conclusion is wrong.

Shhh... if you expose his inconsistency, he might be forced to reconsider his position. ;)

I suspected you knew how to spell it. I had to copy-paste from another site, so I understand the difficulty. :)

Given that you invent unwarranted conclusions about Adam and Eve's biology, your claim to biblical literalism here is simply laughable.

Thanks for exposing your unbiblical position so plainly.

Psst... the word is "naïve"

I like your optimism, though I find it profoundly naive. What you propose is simply not going to happen.