Search results

Did I make ANY comment about your intellect? No. Once again, you misrepresent what I wrote. Your self-righteousness is showing. Obviously, yes. Does Scripture say that the floodgates of heaven "let the waters above heaven flood the earth"? Yes or No, please?

You claim that John was likely illiterate, and you think it is sustained by the Bible? Please, show us the evidence.

I’m glad you understand this.

I don't agree because your point is contrary to truth.

I fiercely refute bad arguments and thoughtlessly parroted errors.

Yawn. Your use of capitals suggests more than what the science supports. Dude... friction. smh... Fallacy: false dichotomy. Apparently you don't understand the nature of synonyms any better than you do that of winds. (Sigh)... I see little point in continuing this conversation. You are so...

So we have some substance to discuss, instead of your empty assertions. No; you misunderstand Scripture, believing that it describes heaven as a firm b/v/t. Do your homework on the etymology of the word "firmament". You make the assertions, but you provide no evidence. Nobody is obligated to...

You know next to nothing about me, so I'll tell you: I've done my homework. I'm not "entrenched" in anything except what Scripture actually says.

Hebrew was no longer the common people since their exile in Babylon; that's why it had to be translated by the priests as noted in Ezra. You aren't making a coherent point. John was likely literate, and could easily have learned both to speak and write Greek.

I certainly don’t defend your misunderstanding of Scripture.

It's not a deflection to point out the fallacy.When the "main point" of an argument depends upon a logical fallacy, there is no point. There is nothing remaining to be addressed or considered. Sometimes, along with the fallacious assertion, there is a valid point made, and dismissing that...

Who are "these people" whom you disparage so?

Um, no. Israel was not under God's wrath at the time of the Egyptian enslavement. Please read Genesis carefully.

Israel under Rome was a literate society, and Koine Greek was the common language spoken across the Eastern Mediterranean. Why would John not be literate in the language, especially after decades of being a missionary?

Today I learned that "Peppermint Bark" coffee has a significant dose of chocolate in its aroma. I'm not usually one for flavoured coffee, as I consistently find that the aroma does not translate to the taste, but this was tolerable, and smelled nice.

The movie was enjoyable though.

Again, you either don't understand, or you misrepresent, or both. Wind is a fairly constant reality; it is actually less common for there to be "no wind" than for there to be a perceptible wind, but it does occur, as I suspect you know. The wind does not always blow in a direction consistent...

Instead of asserting what "defenders of Scientism" believe, or would explain, how about you quote some people who you think are "defenders of Scientism".

Wrong. All the available manuscripts are considered in the preparation of the Nestle-Alland. Do I really need to quote the verse to you? Genetic fallacy, twice. The location does not dictate the belief. Athanasius, who debated Arius, was bishop of, oh, where was it... Alexandria. Another...

Moorman made the same mistake here, assuming that the TR is the correct one. Difference in word counts is evidence only of... difference. It does not establish or support either as being correct.