Search results

Correction: zenith, not nadir.

You haven't answered my questions. Why should I answer yours?

More empty blather and still no testable model offered as an alternative to gravity. Step up, or shut up.

Yet you again offer nothing as an alternative. Most likely because you have nothing to offer.

A little understanding of grammar will go a long way in answering the question.

'Fundamental'? Or 'foundational'? Unless, of course, the founders were mental. ;)

Fodder and wheat are both food. Either tares or chaff would be appropriate instead of 'fodder'. Luke 12:51-53 NLT - "Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I have come to divide people against each other! From now on families will be split apart, three in favor of me, and...

Plain ignorance is excusable. Willful ignorance is foolish.

Gravity. It doesn't remain level; it changes with tides, caused by gravity. Displacement, related to gravity. Gravity. You deny gravity, but offer no alternate explanation. I am confident that you don't have an alternate explanation. Gravitational force is one of the physical laws given by...

It doesn't. Put a helium balloon in a vacuum and it will fall like a stone. Put it in regular atmosphere and it will float up. David, you need to propose an alternate testable theory in place of the gravity you deny. You have to explain the forces that cause change in momentum that happens when...

We can agree to disagree on that; the text isn't clear enough to make a categorical decision. O as in Opinion, not based on fact of the text... or any intimation thereof.

Are you trying to use the minimum number of keystrokes in your posts? Here is the post to which you posted the above response: "You either believe or you don't. No such distinction or differentiation in the bible. " Perhaps you are asking whether you believe correctly or incorrectly, or you...

Nothing is provable to the person whose mind is shut. Do you mean the laws that you are unable to articulate and clearly have not studied? Meaningless, ignorant blather. More of the same.

Yes, God gave the sign of the rainbow. The text does not say that He created it at that time, nor what the design signifies. Further, your quotation proves nothing regarding your incorrect assertion.

Believing is not the same thing as faith. Faith is believing something without being able to know by direct observation. I have faith that I will rise again to eternal life because Jesus has done so. However, I have not observed His resurrection or ascension. Believing that the Earth is flat...

Hogwash. You have never taken a course in physics, have you? Because of ... GRAVITY. smh... I have pondered them, when I studied physics! Gravity, mass, weight, and a spinning globe are all demonstrably consistent. With the modicum of respect I can muster, I must tell you, you are out of...

Peace to you to, but you're still incorrect. No it is not. It is the refraction of visible "white" light into its component colours and is caused by light wavelength variability.

As neither of these is an "irrevocable Law", you have given nothing. Um... "sequester" means to put aside for safekeeping or for a specific purpose.

You might want to review your grammar. Here is what your statement actually says: "When "churches" begin to teach Spiritual Circumcision, the only denomination is Spiritual Blindness."

This verse has nothing to do with your title question. Please explain WHY you are asking all these odd questions. Is this all for an assignment in a comparative religions class?