Search results

Why?

If the women in your group choose to wear dresses, that's fine; it's their choice. However, dresses have nothing to do with modesty, necessarily. Shorts, likewise are not immodest. Scripture doesn't require women to wear dresses, nor does it forbid either gender from wearing shorts. What you...

I understand your model, but it has been refuted. Please, demonstrate your intelligence by abandoning it.

@Moses_Young : Your 'Disagree' tells me that you have not examined the evidence.

I would suggest you read my posts more carefully before responding next time. ;)

Many readers assume that the chapter divisions are original to Paul's writing; they aren't, but rather were added in the 16th century, in the published editions of Robert Estienne (aka Stephanus). While the divisions (and verse numbers) are not arbitrary, they also not to be given the same...

Again, your model has been refuted by photographic evidence.

Okay, but where and when did this happen, and who was preaching it? If we are going to call other persons "heretical", we need to make very sure that our condemnation is justified by facts, not rumours, reports, and innuendos. It is not reasonable to tar the entire movement with the words of a...

Sadly, the modern version of 'tolerance' is "You must tolerate me (or them) while I am (or they are) justified in refusing to tolerate you."

What is your source for the image, and what is its source for the summary statements about the "gospels" allegedly "seen"? Or to put it more bluntly, who is making these claims?

With respect, what does the content of your post have to do with the thread title?

Several of my colleagues wore masks at a recent staff event. I chose not to question their rationale. None suggested that anyone else should be wearing them. Shrug.

As your answer is irrelevant to my questions, I shall take it as a clear indication of the desired relevance of my answers to your questions, should I ever choose to provide such.

Perhaps one day you will realize that it is disrespectful to ask questions repeatedly of others without answering their questions of you. Until you answer my questions, I will not answer any of yours.

What does the Scripture tell you?

Your question is unclear. Were you asking... Does 1 Corinthians 11 mean a woman should have long hair for her husband or does it mean she should have long hair for God? Or... Does 1 Corinthians 11 mean [a woman should have long hair for her husband or God], or does it mean [something else]?

If that is your intention, you're wasting your time asking such specific questions... as Maxwel explained.

Your "flat Earth" has been thoroughly refuted by the Northward shadows in Sydney, Australia. They are impossible in that model.

It doesn't, as I have stated at least twice in this thread. Your refusal to learn is shameful. Your misunderstanding of physics is profound. There is no such law. You have badly misunderstood this Scripture.

Another meaningless question from under the bridge.