Search results

Except it was Trump and his followers who radicalized these peopleby convincing them that the election had been stolen from them when they in fact legitimately lost Google made the decision parler due to their failure to moderate hate speech and threats of violence this is how the free market...

I agree with you on the lefts failure to condemn BLM violence However we can't ignore the fact that right-wingers have become dangerously radicalize due to Trump's demagoguery and rhetoric

You can't really compare a gay wedding cake to inciting insurrection imagine I went into Walmart and started encouraging customers to violently take over Walmart and then have the nerve to act persecuted when Walmart tells me I'm not allowed back on the property also I think this is the third...

Non sequitur.

Let me say this again. You don't have a civil right to someone's property or services Private owned media companies can filter content at their own discretion.You agree to their terms and conditions when you create your account just like you don't have a civil right to shop at Walmart if they...

No that's not what that means. Civil court is for issues that aren't criminal like if you hire me to mow your lawn and then refuse to pay me I can take you to civil court and sue you You don't have a civil right to anyone's property or services.

they can be sued in civil court but it's not a first amendment issue because you don't have first amendment rights on social media

nice try but it was trumper's who tried to stage a violent insurrection at the Capitol

If anything the Trump administration is showing us just how disconnected from reality a large portion of America is. These people are dangerous

Yeah the first amendment says the government can't put you in jail over words It doesn't say social media can't kick you off of their platform

You don't have first amendment rights on social media Also inciting violence isn't covered under the first amendment Neither is slander or defamation

Yeah except it's not really censorship Google made the decision to cut ties with parlersb because of parlersfailure to moderate inappropriate content like hate speech and threats of violence I'm pretty sure Google made this decision to protect themselves from liability

No he didn't

He's trying to overturn a legal election

There's nothing illegal about mail-in ballots

Yeah courts don't tend to take cases with no evidence

Yeah courts don't waste their time with things when you can't provide any evidence to even proceed with the hearing

Also Trump is literally trying to stage a coup and undermine our democracy. That's exactly what an inspiring dictator does

No laws have been broken by the media companies They can filter content at their own discretion Any company reserve the right to protect themselves from liability imagine I went into Walmart trying to encourage customers to take over Walmart and then have the audacity to ask shock when Walmart...

Trump is absolutely liable here and that's why he's been kicked off and literally every social media platform What do you think is going to happen when an aspiring dictator convinces his followers that the election was stolen from them he in fact legitimately lost