Search results

Right... This isn't North Korea as long as everyone involved are consenting adults, they are within their constitutional rights

just saying people need to learn their logical fallacies before they try to debate

Nah.,..

right of course Google is going to deplatform this nonsense to protect themselves from liability

I took the liberty of crossing out the f word but it's stuff like this that got parler deplatformed

In case you're wondering what got parler deplatformed, it was stuff like this I took the liberty of crossing out the f word

I think Google is just trying to protect themselves from liability

Or another example if I go into McDonald's, it's probably safe to assume I intend to order food That's not a false dichotomy to say if I don't like McDonald's that I'm probably vegan, that's the false dichotomy

Yeah again that's not the definition of false dichotomy If someone is doing A, it's safe to assume he probably intends to do B Example.. if someone is pointing a gun at me, it's safe to assume he probably intends to kill me That's not a false dichotomy the false dichotomy will be the say I...

also you might want to Google the definition of false dichotomy because that's not it If someone is doing A, they probably intended to do B.. that's not a false dichotomy False dichotomy is when it has to be either one or the other

Except not really when people storm a government building carrying zip ties, it's fairly safe to assume they intend to take hostages

social media sites like Facebook and Twitter are mostly paid for by advertisements and sponsors I'm not sure what that has to do with them having the right to enforce theirterms and conditions that you will agree to upon creating your account

yeah you still have your first amendment rights. Just do it on another platform as Google is under no obligation to give you a platform

yeah one of the rioters was carrying zip ties which meant he was planning on taking hostages Fortunately the politicians they intended to harm were not present that day

For the 55 millionth time there's no such thing as free speech on social media. You agree to their terms and conditions upon creating your account I say we let the free market decide what is or isn't acceptable Imagine I ran a restaurant and refuse service to black people. It wouldn't take long...

oh yeah stop discriminating against me. All I'm doing is going on social media calling for violence insurrection

Gay wedding cake versus inciting insurrection

You don't have a civil right to someone else's property or services

nope there is zero evidence to suggest that antifa had anything to do with this one of the first things they called does is convince you that everyone else is lying Everyone is lying except Trump...riiiiiggt