Search results

Add "hijacker" (which is what you have done with this thread) and "pathetic whiner" for all your posts noting the criticisms you have received. Wait... add "immature" to the list... Grow up.

The Bible is not explicit in naming the serpent, but it is reasonably clear from context and from later texts that the serpent and the devil are, if not actually the same being, at least on the same side.

No, it is not.

His point is clear: thinking about having sex with a particular woman (who is not your wife) is sin.

No, that was not the point He was making.

Your point and example are valid, but I disagree with your summary. Adultery is the action; lust is entirely in the mind. Jesus equated the two because lust was considered acceptable as no action had taken place. He made it clear that relishing the thought of sex with a person other than your...

In real life, if people try to communicate directly with you, and your every response is spoken to the room in general, people will think you're weird and will abandon the effort to befriend you. The same will happen here. People might be kind (or at least tolerant), but won't bother with you...

Learn to use the REPLY function and you might get one.

Nobody but you knows to whom you are responding. Use the REPLY button. Lower right of each post.

There's something critical that you overlooked: Hebrew wasn't the language of the people by that period, and hadn't been since the Babylonian captivity.

Use the REPLY function. Your refusal to do so isn't helping your case.

It is certainly possible to think about sex without lusting; people who say otherwise are simply moralizing. That said, it is also common to think about sex in inappropriate ways, and Paul is making clear that is sinful. Sadly, many people are broken or immature regarding this issue, and fall...

Use the REPLY function. Treating this forum like your personal journal is inappropriate.

While that is possible, there have been too many cases where the guidance I receive leads to "divine encounters" that my conscience by itself could not foresee. :)

We all can determine that the man was actually 22 years old. The convoluted explanation does nothing to undo the fact that there is a clear contradiction (an error) in the KJV text.

I don't recall you ever providing any examples of these alleged "untruths"... without being blatantly hypocritical. Whatever errors you claim are in other versions must be completely absent from the KJV.

It would help if you would use the REPLY button so that everyone knows the post to which you are responding. :)

While I agree that a faithful witness cannot lie, there are untruths that are not lies. As you are well aware, the KJV Bible states that Azariah was both 22 years old and 42 years old when he began his reign (your convoluted explanation notwithstanding); one of these is not the truth. By your...

Here is your earlier assertion: Do you recant this claim? If not, your apology is empty.

He came to fulfill, and in doing so He rendered it powerless over those who believe in Him (per Hebrews 8).