Search results

You don't read too well. That explains a lot.

Jesus is Messiah, God the Son, the Creator, Redeemer, Intercessor, High Priest, Alpha and Omega. No one comes to God the Father except through Jesus. There is no other name under heaven given to humans by which we can be saved.

Quote me where I have claimed to believe in OSAS. Until you do, you have no cause to assume I do and your attempt at dismissal is pathetically irrelevant.

Start by reading Genesis 1 in several different translations. BibleGateway.com can help you with this. You appear to start with the belief that the Earth is flat, then attempt to prove your case with Scripture, instead of starting by attempting to understand fully what Scripture is saying and...

If I listen to ‘secular music’ in the privacy of my own home (or with headphones while in public), how can it possibly be a stumbling block to someone else? The point of the passage is that if you know someone else has issues, don’t throw your freedom in their face, lest they sin because their...

What you have is not a model based on the word of God, but rather based on your interpretation of the word of God. In other words, you have circular reasoning.

And here I thought your "lesson learned" was about the moon's orbit. The tennis ball thing is also invalid though.

The missile itself doesn't need to "determine the curvature"; it only needs to follow the sea surface. The principles of its design incorporate the reality of the curved sea surface.

Close, but no cookie. Gideon was not basing the validity of his statement on the fact that it is held by a majority of people. He made separate assertions. Had he used the word "because" or something similar in between, your criticism would be valid. Of course, you'll just put an X on this...

Your point is irrelevant because you don’t understand what I wrote. I know perfectly well what I wrote, and there is no deception in it.

Learn how to read. In the first post you quoted, I used the word ‘force’; you misquoted it as ‘model’. The rest of your argument is baseless therefore.

Sit back and watch the minions argue, or something like that?

What's your motivation for resurrecting this zombie thread?

I hope you have seen your error, and understand the vast semantic gulf between "intentional" and "international".

Eric Dubay? No need to click the link... he's been soundly debunked.

And after all, idle hands are the devil's workshop. ;)

You don't ask "simple questions". You ask silly or poorly-worded questions that can be read many different ways and stubbornly refuse to explain what you are asking.

Your original post of the alleged conundrum provided the evidence. In other words, it was self-refuting. ;)

There is no need to drag your pet peeve into this thread, or any other.

I thought that was my specialty. Around here, at least.