Search results

”Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.“ ‭‭Acts‬ ‭2‬:‭38‬ ‭NIV‬‬

”But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus.“ ‭‭Luke‬ ‭1‬:‭30‬-‭31‬ ‭NIV‬‬

That’s a childish comment that doesn’t address the point.

Obscurity of a message is a completely different issue than obscurity of words. The reader has no hope of understanding even a clear passage if he can't understand the words used to convey it.

None of that explains away the archaic words in the KJV.

Your statement is completely at odds with your adherence to a 400-year-old translation with many archaic and redefined words.

In what sense? It needs to be applied?

It's yet another attempt by the enemy to undermine God's people. How should the Church respond? The same way it does to every other attempt: keep preaching the truth and keep making disciples.

There is no verse or passage in Scripture that says, "10 means a royal appointment"... or even implies it.

Not necessarily, and yes, but both issues are irrelevant here. Regarding Psalm 12. I did my own study and came to my own conclusions.

You’re making a circular argument.

Don’t ask stupid questions.

When the word ‘from’ follows the word ‘preserve’, it doesn’t mean the temporal ‘from’, which is what you are arguing. Rather, it means ‘away’ or ‘at a safe distance’. God promises to preserve the poor and needy at a safe distance from the vile and wicked. You don’t preserve food from the day it...

Is your god so small that he needs to do something special to preserve his words? Mine isn't. My God speaks and things happen. Yes, the poor and needy are preserved forever. That's the reward God has for those with faith in Him. I suspect you didn't consider that.

I don't give a flying flip what the "Textual Critic's perspective" is. I think for myself. Still another asinine assumption. You just don't learn. Wrong. I'm stating quite confidently that the KJV-only perspective on this verse is incorrect because its holders consistently IGNORE the words...

From that generation. You still don’t see those three words.

Sadly, this has the potential to turn into a border war… migrants vs truckers, but I can’t fault the truckers for doing what the feds refuse to do.

No it does not! 5 For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, saith the Lord; I will set him in safety from him that puffeth at him. 6 The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7 Thou shalt keep them...

Poor Pentecostals... having to apply euphemisms to their addictions....

Incorrect and irrelevant.