Search results

Okay, you want to be flippant and disrespectful, I'm not interested in discussion with you.

Don't make asinine assumptions. I understand far more than you think.

I see no point in discussing Scripture with someone who won't admit it when Scripture proves him wrong.

Blah blah blah. How about admitting that you were wrong?

"The Bible doesn't say that. Simeon says specifically to Mary, "A sword will pierce your own soul." He does not say it to everyone. " That's because you don't know Scripture. Luke 2:34 Then Simeon blessed them and said to Mary, his mother: “This child is destined to cause the falling and...

When Scripture is needed, I'll add it. I don't need Scripture to tell you that what you claim is not scriptural. I made a clear reference to Scripture... and you ignored it.

Or, 88 syllables to say what could have been said in ten, and would still be irrelevant. Wrong. There are other passages that address God's preservation of His word through time. Not even a little. You can believe what you like, but that doesn't mean it's true. Modern scholarship is not...

Not exactly. I call it you trying to make doctrine out of thin air and me telling you you’re out to lunch.

So you admit it? Well, that's a start.

Um, no. There is nothing whatsoever in the text to suggest that God is emphasizing 'these particular words'. ALL of God's words are pure. Again, no. God is saying He will keep the poor and needy. He has no need to "preserve" His words, because His words stand unassailable. It's ridiculous that...

More asinine silliness. It's not the truth of God that is dividing here; it's your stubbornness in asserting what it does not say.

You think that just because someone doesn't always love their enemy or their neighbour (in your opinion) that they aren't Christian? How dumb can you be and still breathe?

Don't bother with your dismissive comments... especially when they don't relate to my post at all. The Bible doesn't say that. Simeon says specifically to Mary, "A sword will pierce your own soul." He does not say it to everyone. Given that most of the rest of your post is based on this...

"I have come to bring a sword" is not a covenant. If you would drop the concept (and word) 'covenant', we can have a conversation. Otherwise, you're off in left field.

C'mon... we haven't had a heretical troll in a couple of weeks! ;)

Miss the point much?

It’s simple: if a woman has preferences, they are ‘standards’, but if a man has preferences, it is ‘shallowness’. Or, in the case of ethnicity or other basis, if “I” think “you” are not attractive, then “I” have standards, but if “you” don’t think “I” am attractive, you’re shallow. I’d like...

Nice. Completely miss the point and instead make a snarky comment.

And most other places, sadly.

Rejecting the word of someone else’s senior pastor is nothing; who is he to you? Rejecting the word of your own senior pastor is quite appropriate if his word is contrary to Scripture.