Search results

Then please tell me one Single denomination which is 100% correct in their teaching. This is not for to blame. Its simply an fact. Of course you can attacking me. But this changes nothing on this fact.

No I am not ignorant. I believe 2. TIM 3,16! BUT I also believe that it is not correct to create doctrines ore teachings simply in taken verses of the context and meaning. A good example are the JW, which are taken their false doctrine out of the word of God.

Well, i am not talking about speaking in tongues. I talk about the teaching about baptised with the Holy Spirit and as proof for that the gift of speaking in tongues. This is the different to that what you mentioned.

In concern of Jesus, of course

It seems so. It is to see that almost All Christian denominations grow together connectet with the charismatic und pentecistal movements, what is called oekomene. I know denominations which were 30 years ago against charismatic teachings ore woman pastorship became open for this teachings today.

But before 1901, is not reportet from any Christians that they become the baptism with the Holy Spirit and as sign for this the gift of speaking tongues. This began in Topeka first.

Thats correct., and they used it manly for jews, because the OT is about their history with God.

That people are missuesing and ignoring the word of God since it was written is not New. And you can find in any denomination. There is non which is 100% correct in teaching. Your view is wide agreed in christianity and World. But is still not what the bible says about woman pastorship.

You are right, all scriptures (66books) are from God. But if you believe all the scripture is for us Christians you are wrong. We can learn a lot from, thats also correct. But you cant take f.e. the OT law for the church. I mean, today you find many selfmade theologie which uses the verses how...

Well, I do not mean only the teaching that someone is saved what for example the non trinitarian Oneness movement teaches. I mean the teaching what is called the 2nd blessing ore the empowerment with the Holy Spirit, which is taught in various forms since Azusa.

The problem is not that cessationism deny that God is working still with miracles and healings for his gloryfication. The problem is that since Topeka and Azuza a New teaching arose among Christians which claims that the spiritual gifts (tongues, prophecie, healings) are today the same as in...

This is then a reason to ignore the Word of God?

Maby you read with a certain glass? If you ignore the scripure, like 1.Tim 3 ore Titus 1, ore 1.Tim 2, ore Genesis 2+ 3, then I could understand your view. But you neclecting clear scripture and prefer speculation and manwisedom. How then is to help you? F.e. when Genesis 3 and 1.Tim 2 is...

So, according your statement, you ignore 1 Tim. 3 and Titus 1 compleate. There Man should be married for to become eldest/ pastor. But in your view woman should be unmarried to become eldest/ pastor? Where are the bible verses for this statement?

Well Dino, I wrote my part. And I have a good consience. I take the word, as it is written. The arguments which you and others use to convince that Woman Pastors are biblical have their Fundament on time spirit, human wisedom and ignoring what is written. No good Fundament for teach Gods...

Well, for me it seems you puzzle your own theologie. Do so, but it is not what God teaches in his word. But be sure, you are not alone with that. The mayority would agree with you.

But invites your view then not a wide range of speculations, while the written word is clear and not to misundetstood. It is not only because of the verses which clear says why woman should not be teach and lead man. Beginning with the creation order first man then woman. Then genesis 3 where...

Yes, you are right , this is realy a foolish question! Of course she can not. So 1.Tim. 3 is for man not for an woman. The theme of this thread is not can a woman be in the ministrie for God. The theme is: are Woman Pastors biblical. So it is not biblical and you agree with this, right? That...

What please is rude? I know enough people who create their own teaching and neglecting the Holy Spirit has inspired the Word of God. So what please is rude? I even not getting an answer to this question. So what should i think?

What is different?