Search results

  1. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    A Not Often quoted part of scripture. But look at the gems. For those who say obedience is not a requirement under the NT. Romans 13 8 Owe no one anything except to love one another, for he who loves another has fulfilled the law. 9 For the commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You...
  2. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Continual belief is not required if you have already believed. E-G also said the same in a post. Discern is not on the same page though on this one.
  3. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Its not what she said.
  4. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Why Don't you ask him yourself?
  5. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    True belief = righteous living. Cannot be divorced from one another. Sanctification is part of the plan. 2 Thessalonians 2 13 But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God from the beginning chose you for salvation through sanctification by the...
  6. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    One where you believe in Jesus and never stop believing in Him. For if you stop then you are Apostate.
  7. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Yet by your own words you do not need to continue in belief.
  8. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Mystery of Lawlessness growing.
  9. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    EleventhHour doesnt believe that continual faith is necessary. So a major disconnect there.
  10. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    I believe Discern said that continual belief is necessary. So on that front we have unity.
  11. Chris1975

    Gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable???????????

    It is my experience here that when the scriptures can't be refuted, then the attacks become personal.
  12. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    If you don't read what I post, then don't reply to my posts concerning something you didn't read. Rather create an entirely new post. Because reading (post 120444 and 120445) again, you make a very strong implication in 120445 (1 minute after posting 120444). If you were honest about this it was...
  13. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Well, neither of us were wrong. We agreed on the general premise of Romans 11. Now read the rest of it. I can assure you that there is pearls there for you too. Maybe next time don't be so quick to shoot down something you never analysed properly (post 120444 and 120445)
  14. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    Was I?
  15. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    You actually did not read what was written in this post at all, did you?
  16. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    I already highlighted the red portions for you.;)
  17. Chris1975

    Apostasy 101

    This verse...... Romans 11v29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. Is being used in the wrong context to uphold certain doctrinal positions. It is being used as a promise of God that an INDIVDUAL cannot lose their gift of salvation once they believe (at some point in time) the...
  18. Chris1975

    Not By Works

    This verse...... Romans 11v29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. Is being used in the wrong context to uphold certain doctrinal positions. It is being used as a promise of God that an INDIVDUAL cannot lose their gift of salvation once they believe (at some point in time) the...